Spaces of Transformative Practice: Co-producing, (Re)Making and Translating Fractional Urban Space in Gugulethu, Cape Town.

IF 1.2 Q3 URBAN STUDIES Urban Forum Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-31 DOI:10.1007/s12132-021-09436-6
Kathryn Ewing
{"title":"Spaces of Transformative Practice: Co-producing, (Re)Making and Translating Fractional Urban Space in Gugulethu, Cape Town.","authors":"Kathryn Ewing","doi":"10.1007/s12132-021-09436-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reimagining neglected urban space offers the potential for social cohesion, integration, and connectivity. The intimate, interstitial or fractional spaces of a city represent a key component of social infrastructure in a neighbourhood. The smallest of interventions in urban space adds value and complexity to urban life. However, fractional, yet deeply transformative, urban space is often unrecognised and undocumented. Transformative practice seeks to accommodate, anticipate and represent inclusive public life but requires discovering new content and definitions on <i>public space</i> to decode emerging processes of incremental place-making in an African context. The narrative focuses on a network of place-making intervention projects as part of an urban upgrading programme in Lotus Park informal settlement, located in Gugulethu, Cape Town. A set of tracings, integrated with theoretical frames, reveal the impact of upgraded urban space through firstly, emerging centres and the (re)making of place on the periphery; secondly, disrupting edges and the co-production process involved in the negotiation of space; and lastly, crafting shadows and interpreting traces of micro-interventions. The purpose is to explore urban space as continually adapting to the intrusions in the city grid to translate (1) innovative modes of spatial production; (2) dynamic forms of local agency; (3) marginal ways of operating; and (4) interconnected and multi-scalar urban processes of everyday place-making. The practice of co-producing and (re)making urban space in Gugulethu uncovers alternate mechanisms for governance, partnerships and operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":35221,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forum","volume":"32 1","pages":"395-413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-021-09436-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reimagining neglected urban space offers the potential for social cohesion, integration, and connectivity. The intimate, interstitial or fractional spaces of a city represent a key component of social infrastructure in a neighbourhood. The smallest of interventions in urban space adds value and complexity to urban life. However, fractional, yet deeply transformative, urban space is often unrecognised and undocumented. Transformative practice seeks to accommodate, anticipate and represent inclusive public life but requires discovering new content and definitions on public space to decode emerging processes of incremental place-making in an African context. The narrative focuses on a network of place-making intervention projects as part of an urban upgrading programme in Lotus Park informal settlement, located in Gugulethu, Cape Town. A set of tracings, integrated with theoretical frames, reveal the impact of upgraded urban space through firstly, emerging centres and the (re)making of place on the periphery; secondly, disrupting edges and the co-production process involved in the negotiation of space; and lastly, crafting shadows and interpreting traces of micro-interventions. The purpose is to explore urban space as continually adapting to the intrusions in the city grid to translate (1) innovative modes of spatial production; (2) dynamic forms of local agency; (3) marginal ways of operating; and (4) interconnected and multi-scalar urban processes of everyday place-making. The practice of co-producing and (re)making urban space in Gugulethu uncovers alternate mechanisms for governance, partnerships and operations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转型实践空间:开普敦古古勒图部分城市空间的共建(再)造与转化
重新构想被忽视的城市空间为社会凝聚力、一体化和连通性提供了潜力。城市的私密空间、间隙空间或分数空间是社区社会基础设施的关键组成部分。城市空间中最小的干预增加了城市生活的价值和复杂性。然而,城市空间虽小,但却具有深刻的变革意义,往往未被认可和记录。变革实践寻求适应、预测和代表包容性的公共生活,但需要在公共空间上发现新的内容和定义,以解读非洲背景下增量场所制造的新兴过程。故事的重点是作为位于开普敦Gugulethu的莲花公园非正式定居点城市升级计划的一部分的场所制作干预项目网络。一套与理论框架相结合的追踪图揭示了城市空间升级的影响,首先是新兴中心和周边地区的(重新)制造;二是空间谈判中所涉及的边缘破坏和合作生产过程;最后,制造阴影并解释微观干预的痕迹。其目的是探索城市空间如何不断适应城市网格的入侵,从而转化为:(1)创新的空间生产模式;(2)地方代理的动态形式;(3)边际经营方式;(4)日常场所制造的相互关联和多尺度的城市过程。Gugulethu共同生产和(重新)制造城市空间的实践揭示了治理、伙伴关系和运营的替代机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Forum
Urban Forum Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: This journal publishes papers, which engage broadly with urban processes, developments, challenges, politics and people, providing a distinctive African focus on these themes.  Topics covered variously engage with the dynamics of governance, everyday urban life, economies and environments. The journal uses empirical data to reinforce and refine theoretical developments in urban studies, draws on the specificities of the African context, and opens up geographically diverse conversations on African cities. Urban Forum welcomes papers that provide rich evidence from African cities and, in doing so, builds debate and theory that often remains peripheral to urban scholarship.  The journal is open to research based on a range of methodologies, but prioritizes qualitative analysis and interpretation. With this mix, research in Urban Forum demonstrates the ordinary and the exceptional nature of urbanization in African cities.
期刊最新文献
Alter-nation? Factions, Coalitions and Environmental Governance in the Context of Contested Post-apartheid Local State Democratisation Armed Conflict and Urbanization in Cabo Delgado, Mozambique: A Methodology for a Critical Inquiry Social Housing and Upward Mobility in South Africa: an Assessment of Household Outcomes The Past in Present African Urban Mobility Systems: Towards a Mobilities Longue Durée “Nimble Sociality and Belonging”: an Ethnography of Migrants’ Responses to Bans on Associational Life During the COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1