Adaptation and acceptability testing of the Expector® vibration vest in horses

Gabriela Novo de Oliveira, Sofia Cicolo da Silva, Miriam Zibordi, A. Barros, C. Belli
{"title":"Adaptation and acceptability testing of the Expector® vibration vest in horses","authors":"Gabriela Novo de Oliveira, Sofia Cicolo da Silva, Miriam Zibordi, A. Barros, C. Belli","doi":"10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2022.181942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The project is based on a test of a thoracic vibration vest prototype, adapted to equines by the Expector® vest’s company, on healthy animals. Ten (10) equines were used in the project, male or female, adults, healthy, belonging to FMVZUSP or private owners. Each animal went through two phases: A and B. Phase A consisted of the placement of the vest without turning on the vibrators, evaluating the animal’s acceptability, facility, adaptation to the animal’s body, and discomfort due to the vest’s use. Phase B included the placement of the vest and turning on the vibrators, evaluating the animal’s acceptability, reaction to the vibrators, and, if present, to which velocity/type of vibration, and the presence of adverse effects. Both phases were done three times on separate days. The behavioral parameters: “placement facility” and “adaptation to the animal’s body” were observed. In phase B, the response to the vibration was classified from 0 to 5. The answer was evaluated on low and high intensities for the four vibration types. The heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) were also evaluated at the beginning and end of each repetition. The animals’ HR was kept on normal, except for one animal on one day of the test. Concerning the RR, most animals presented moments of tachypnea. On the experiment’s first day, 100% of grade Great to “facility of placement” and “adaptation to the animal’s body” was obtained, but on days 2 and 3 this value dropped to 90% due to alterations in one animal’s responses. Regarding vibration’s responses, 77.3% were evaluated as no discomfort (grade 0), 17.1% little discomfort (grade 1), 3.3% medium discomfort (grade 2), 0.4% great discomfort (grade 3), 0.21% extreme discomfort (grade 4), and 1.6% non-acceptance of the vest (grade 5). Some possible changes on the prototype were also verified to be suggested to the manufacturer, such as the change of the buckle and the use of wireless control. Vest use appears promising for equine respiratory physiotherapy, considering the acceptability was good, and its efficiency on the expectoration of diseased animals must be tested.","PeriodicalId":9119,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2022.181942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The project is based on a test of a thoracic vibration vest prototype, adapted to equines by the Expector® vest’s company, on healthy animals. Ten (10) equines were used in the project, male or female, adults, healthy, belonging to FMVZUSP or private owners. Each animal went through two phases: A and B. Phase A consisted of the placement of the vest without turning on the vibrators, evaluating the animal’s acceptability, facility, adaptation to the animal’s body, and discomfort due to the vest’s use. Phase B included the placement of the vest and turning on the vibrators, evaluating the animal’s acceptability, reaction to the vibrators, and, if present, to which velocity/type of vibration, and the presence of adverse effects. Both phases were done three times on separate days. The behavioral parameters: “placement facility” and “adaptation to the animal’s body” were observed. In phase B, the response to the vibration was classified from 0 to 5. The answer was evaluated on low and high intensities for the four vibration types. The heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) were also evaluated at the beginning and end of each repetition. The animals’ HR was kept on normal, except for one animal on one day of the test. Concerning the RR, most animals presented moments of tachypnea. On the experiment’s first day, 100% of grade Great to “facility of placement” and “adaptation to the animal’s body” was obtained, but on days 2 and 3 this value dropped to 90% due to alterations in one animal’s responses. Regarding vibration’s responses, 77.3% were evaluated as no discomfort (grade 0), 17.1% little discomfort (grade 1), 3.3% medium discomfort (grade 2), 0.4% great discomfort (grade 3), 0.21% extreme discomfort (grade 4), and 1.6% non-acceptance of the vest (grade 5). Some possible changes on the prototype were also verified to be suggested to the manufacturer, such as the change of the buckle and the use of wireless control. Vest use appears promising for equine respiratory physiotherapy, considering the acceptability was good, and its efficiency on the expectoration of diseased animals must be tested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expector®振动背心在马身上的适应性和可接受性测试
该项目基于Expector®背心公司在健康动物身上对胸部振动背心原型进行的测试,该原型适用于马。项目中使用了十(10)只马,雄性或雌性,成年,健康,属于FMVZUSP或私人所有者。每只动物都经历了两个阶段:A和B。A阶段包括在不打开振动器的情况下放置背心,评估动物的可接受性、设施、对动物身体的适应程度以及背心使用引起的不适。阶段B包括放置背心和打开振动器,评估动物的可接受性、对振动器的反应,以及(如果存在)振动的速度/类型,以及是否存在不良影响。这两个阶段在不同的日子里进行了三次。观察行为参数:“安置设施”和“对动物身体的适应”。在阶段B中,对振动的响应从0分类到5。对四种振动类型的低强度和高强度进行了评估。在每次重复的开始和结束时还评估心率(HR)和呼吸频率(RR)。除了试验一天的一只动物外,动物的HR保持正常。关于RR,大多数动物出现呼吸急促的症状。在实验的第一天,获得了100%的“安置设施”和“对动物身体的适应”等级,但在第2天和第3天,由于一只动物的反应发生了变化,这一数值降至90%。关于振动反应,77.3%被评估为无不适(0级),17.1%为轻微不适(1级),3.3%为中度不适(2级),0.4%为严重不适(3级),0.21%为极度不适(4级),1.6%为不接受背心(5级)。原型上的一些可能的变化也被证实是向制造商建议的,例如皮带扣的变化和无线控制的使用。背心的使用似乎很有希望用于马的呼吸理疗,因为它的可接受性很好,而且必须测试它对患病动物咳痰的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to publish full articles, preliminary notes and review articles in the fields of veterinary medicine, animal science and allied sciences, prepared by national and / or foreign, provided that meet the editorial standards
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Ultrasonographic aspects of the gallbladder mucocele in 30 dogs: retrospective study A systematic review of tetracycline resistance genes in animals and derived products in Latin America and the Caribbean Anesthetic protocol using propofol and isoflurane in spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus) Co-infection of Cytauxzoon felis, Mycoplasma haemofelis, and the feline immunodeficiency virus in a domestic cat in Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil Seroprevalence anti-Leptospira spp. antibodies and the risk factors in cattle of the tropical savannah of eastern Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1