Height, Size, and/or Gap Width Variation in Jumping Stone Configurations: Which Form of Variation Attracts Children the Most?

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI:10.1080/10407413.2022.2086460
A. M. Jeschke, S. Caljouw, F. Zaal, R. Withagen
{"title":"Height, Size, and/or Gap Width Variation in Jumping Stone Configurations: Which Form of Variation Attracts Children the Most?","authors":"A. M. Jeschke, S. Caljouw, F. Zaal, R. Withagen","doi":"10.1080/10407413.2022.2086460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Earlier studies revealed that children prefer nonstandardized jumping stone configurations to standardized ones. In the present study, we examined whether children playing on jumping stones prefer variation in stone height, stone size, and/or gap width. In Experiment 1, children could play freely on one standardized configuration and three configurations in which one of the aforementioned factors was varied. It was found that children judged the variation in height as most fun. Yet, the configuration with gap width variation appeared to be most challenging for the children—most overground steps were made in this configuration. In Experiment 2, we examined whether the attractiveness of the configurations increased when height variation was combined with the other forms of variation. Adding size and/or gap width variation to the variation in height did not contribute to the attractiveness of the configuration. In line with experiment 1, it was found that the configurations with gap width variation were judged as the most challenging for children. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of the literature on play.","PeriodicalId":47279,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2022.2086460","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Earlier studies revealed that children prefer nonstandardized jumping stone configurations to standardized ones. In the present study, we examined whether children playing on jumping stones prefer variation in stone height, stone size, and/or gap width. In Experiment 1, children could play freely on one standardized configuration and three configurations in which one of the aforementioned factors was varied. It was found that children judged the variation in height as most fun. Yet, the configuration with gap width variation appeared to be most challenging for the children—most overground steps were made in this configuration. In Experiment 2, we examined whether the attractiveness of the configurations increased when height variation was combined with the other forms of variation. Adding size and/or gap width variation to the variation in height did not contribute to the attractiveness of the configuration. In line with experiment 1, it was found that the configurations with gap width variation were judged as the most challenging for children. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of the literature on play.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
飞石形态中的高度、大小和/或间隙宽度变化:哪种形式的变化最吸引孩子?
摘要早期的研究表明,儿童更喜欢非标准化的跳石配置,而不是标准化的。在本研究中,我们调查了在跳石上玩耍的儿童是否喜欢石头高度、石头大小和/或间隙宽度的变化。在实验1中,孩子们可以在一个标准配置和三个配置上自由玩耍,其中上述因素之一是不同的。研究发现,孩子们认为身高的变化最有趣。然而,间隙宽度变化的配置似乎对孩子们来说是最具挑战性的——大多数地上台阶都是在这种配置中制作的。在实验2中,我们检验了当高度变化与其他形式的变化相结合时,这些配置的吸引力是否增加。在高度变化的基础上增加尺寸和/或间隙宽度变化并没有增加配置的吸引力。与实验1一致,发现具有间隙宽度变化的配置被判断为对儿童最具挑战性。这些结果的含义将在戏剧文学的背景下进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Psychology
Ecological Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: This unique journal publishes original articles that contribute to the understanding of psychological and behavioral processes as they occur within the ecological constraints of animal-environment systems. It focuses on problems of perception, action, cognition, communication, learning, development, and evolution in all species, to the extent that those problems derive from a consideration of whole animal-environment systems, rather than animals or their environments in isolation from each other. Significant contributions may come from such diverse fields as human experimental psychology, developmental/social psychology, animal behavior, human factors, fine arts, communication, computer science, philosophy, physical education and therapy, speech and hearing, and vision research.
期刊最新文献
Intergroup Relations as Dynamical Systems: Advancements and Recommendations for Research on Intergroup Friendship and Prejudice Confrontations Remembering Reuben Baron: Creating a Better Social and Ecological Psychology Socializing Ecological Psychology, Ecologizing Social Psychology: How Reuben Baron Shaped the Ecological Approach to Social Knowing, Cooperation, and Values Extending Affordances with Evolutionary Psychology and Connectionist Models: An Essay in Honor of Reuben Baron Conceptualizing the Environment in a Time of Ecological Collapse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1