Critical Conjunctures, Socialist Unity, Radical Prospects

Q1 Social Sciences Capitalism, Nature, Socialism Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10455752.2022.2032609
Salvatore Engel‐Di Mauro
{"title":"Critical Conjunctures, Socialist Unity, Radical Prospects","authors":"Salvatore Engel‐Di Mauro","doi":"10.1080/10455752.2022.2032609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current conjuncture is critical—socially and geo-ecologically (that is, environmentally and ecologically). Globally, decades of capitalist grand theft and destruction of workers’ gains in most countries overwhelm the major social achievements characterising countries like the People’s Republic of China, Vietnam, and Cuba (Baracca and Franconi 2016; Cereseto and Waitzkin 1986; Fitz 2020; Foster 2015; Ghodsee 2018; O’Connor 1998; Prashad 2019; Trinder 2020; Xu 2018). The militarily most powerful liberal democracies persist in wreaking havoc on much of the rest of the world through imperialist and neo-colonial interventions while veering increasingly rightwards. Environmentally, climate change has continued to intensify unabated, with extreme weather events becoming ever more commonplace. Ecologically, net biodiversity decline, deforestation, pathogen outbreaks, and soil destruction keeps rising alongside cases of shortand long-term contamination and pollution. Such a critical conjuncture beckons the unification of forces worldwide that share broadly defined socialist objectives and concerns over the state of ecosystems and environments. For the sake of brevity, I call such objectives and concerns ecosocialist, realising such a term encompasses a much wider political spectrum than the term ecosocialism currently covers. The point is to discuss, first, the tremendous overarching challenges and obstacles to ecosocialist prospects and, second, the sort of socialist responses that appear prevalent. By socialist, I mean anyone striving for the realisation of state-free, classless society. This is an admittedly (and purposefully) wide definition that can accommodate a variety of existing convictions or visions that are not necessarily ecologically mindful or supportive of decolonisation, but that can be transformed into perspectives aligned with ecosocialism. I conclude by identifying strategies conducive to unifying socialist forces and realising ecosocialist objectives. The overarching challenges are unprecedented and of two general kinds. One challenge is geo-ecological and the other social. They are intimately","PeriodicalId":39549,"journal":{"name":"Capitalism, Nature, Socialism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capitalism, Nature, Socialism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2022.2032609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The current conjuncture is critical—socially and geo-ecologically (that is, environmentally and ecologically). Globally, decades of capitalist grand theft and destruction of workers’ gains in most countries overwhelm the major social achievements characterising countries like the People’s Republic of China, Vietnam, and Cuba (Baracca and Franconi 2016; Cereseto and Waitzkin 1986; Fitz 2020; Foster 2015; Ghodsee 2018; O’Connor 1998; Prashad 2019; Trinder 2020; Xu 2018). The militarily most powerful liberal democracies persist in wreaking havoc on much of the rest of the world through imperialist and neo-colonial interventions while veering increasingly rightwards. Environmentally, climate change has continued to intensify unabated, with extreme weather events becoming ever more commonplace. Ecologically, net biodiversity decline, deforestation, pathogen outbreaks, and soil destruction keeps rising alongside cases of shortand long-term contamination and pollution. Such a critical conjuncture beckons the unification of forces worldwide that share broadly defined socialist objectives and concerns over the state of ecosystems and environments. For the sake of brevity, I call such objectives and concerns ecosocialist, realising such a term encompasses a much wider political spectrum than the term ecosocialism currently covers. The point is to discuss, first, the tremendous overarching challenges and obstacles to ecosocialist prospects and, second, the sort of socialist responses that appear prevalent. By socialist, I mean anyone striving for the realisation of state-free, classless society. This is an admittedly (and purposefully) wide definition that can accommodate a variety of existing convictions or visions that are not necessarily ecologically mindful or supportive of decolonisation, but that can be transformed into perspectives aligned with ecosocialism. I conclude by identifying strategies conducive to unifying socialist forces and realising ecosocialist objectives. The overarching challenges are unprecedented and of two general kinds. One challenge is geo-ecological and the other social. They are intimately
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关键时刻,社会主义团结,激进前景
当前的形势至关重要——社会和地理生态(即环境和生态)。在全球范围内,大多数国家几十年来资本主义对工人利益的大规模盗窃和破坏,压倒了中华人民共和国、越南和古巴等国家的主要社会成就(Baracca和Franconi 2016;Cereseto和Waitzkin 1986;Fitz 2020;Foster 2015;Ghodsee 2018;O’Connor 1998;Prashad 2019;Trinder 2020;Xu 2018)。军事上最强大的自由民主国家坚持通过帝国主义和新殖民主义干预对世界其他大部分地区造成严重破坏,同时越来越右倾。在环境方面,气候变化持续加剧,极端天气事件变得越来越普遍。从生态学角度来看,净生物多样性下降、森林砍伐、病原体爆发和土壤破坏,以及短期和长期污染和污染的案例不断增加。这样一个关键的时刻呼唤着全世界力量的统一,这些力量有着广泛定义的社会主义目标和对生态系统和环境状况的担忧。为了简洁起见,我将这些目标和关注点称为生态社会主义,意识到这样一个术语包含的政治范围比生态社会主义目前涵盖的范围要广得多。重点是讨论,首先,生态社会主义前景面临的巨大挑战和障碍,其次,似乎普遍存在的社会主义应对措施。所谓社会主义者,我指的是任何为实现国家自由、无阶级社会而奋斗的人。这是一个公认的(有目的的)广泛定义,可以容纳各种现有的信念或愿景,这些信念或愿景不一定具有生态意识或支持非殖民化,但可以转化为与生态社会主义相一致的观点。最后,我确定了有利于统一社会主义力量和实现生态社会主义目标的战略。总体挑战是前所未有的,分为两大类。一个挑战是地理生态,另一个是社会挑战。他们关系密切
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Capitalism, Nature, Socialism
Capitalism, Nature, Socialism Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: CNS is a journal of ecosocialism. We welcome submissions on red-green politics and the anti-globalization movement; environmental history; workplace labor struggles; land/community struggles; political economy of ecology; and other themes in political ecology. CNS especially wants to join (relate) discourses on labor, feminist, and environmental movements, and theories of political ecology and radical democracy. Works on ecology and socialism are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
The Political Implications of Unequal Exchange: Towards a Common Agenda for Global Social Movements State of Exception, Necropolitics, and Puerto Rico: Naturalizing Disaster and Naturalizing Difference The Quest for Revolutionary Love: John P. Clark Interviews Javier Sethness about Queer Tolstoy Beyond Trash and Garbage: Shifting Perspectives on Discard Discard studies: wasting, systems, and power , Max Liboiron and Josh Lepawsky, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2022, 212 pages, $30 (paperback), ISBN: 9780262543651 Rooted-South Feminisms: Disobedient Epistemologies and Transformative Politics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1