Study of aluminum/kevlar fiber composite laminate with and without TiC nanoparticle impregnation and aluminum/carbon fiber composite laminate for anti-ballistic materials

Benediktus Madika, Anne Z. Syahrial
{"title":"Study of aluminum/kevlar fiber composite laminate with and without TiC nanoparticle impregnation and aluminum/carbon fiber composite laminate for anti-ballistic materials","authors":"Benediktus Madika,&nbsp;Anne Z. Syahrial","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerous studies have investigated the advantages of using composite laminates made of both metals and fibers, which include being able to sustain heavier loads, having better resistance to impacts, and being more durable, while also being lightweight. In this particular study, we utilized the hand lay-up method to create composite laminates consisting of three layers of aluminum alloy and 60 layers of fiber. We tested three different types of aluminum alloy (Al-2024, Al-5052, and Al-7075) and two types of fiber (kevlar and carbon), which were divided into three categories: kevlar fibers, TiC nanoparticle-impregnated kevlar fibers and carbon fibers. We then combined each type of fiber with each type of aluminum alloy to make nine distinct composite laminates. To determine the mechanical properties of the laminates, we used a rule-of-mixture formula. Our research revealed that kevlar fibers had a more significant impact on increasing the yield strength and ultimate tensile strength of the composite laminates than carbon fibers. However, carbon fibers have a greater effect on the modulus of elasticity of the composite. Among all types of aluminum, Al-2024 provides the highest mechanical properties for composite laminates. However, impregnating kevlar fibers with TiC nanoparticles did not enhance the anti-ballistic performance of composite laminates. Consequently, composite laminate that consists of Al-2024 and carbon fibers exhibits the best mechanical properties and anti-ballistic performance, making them the ideal choice for anti-ballistic applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52306,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258884042300029X/pdfft?md5=a90a16157814933bf9c42f5cf7dfe132&pid=1-s2.0-S258884042300029X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258884042300029X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous studies have investigated the advantages of using composite laminates made of both metals and fibers, which include being able to sustain heavier loads, having better resistance to impacts, and being more durable, while also being lightweight. In this particular study, we utilized the hand lay-up method to create composite laminates consisting of three layers of aluminum alloy and 60 layers of fiber. We tested three different types of aluminum alloy (Al-2024, Al-5052, and Al-7075) and two types of fiber (kevlar and carbon), which were divided into three categories: kevlar fibers, TiC nanoparticle-impregnated kevlar fibers and carbon fibers. We then combined each type of fiber with each type of aluminum alloy to make nine distinct composite laminates. To determine the mechanical properties of the laminates, we used a rule-of-mixture formula. Our research revealed that kevlar fibers had a more significant impact on increasing the yield strength and ultimate tensile strength of the composite laminates than carbon fibers. However, carbon fibers have a greater effect on the modulus of elasticity of the composite. Among all types of aluminum, Al-2024 provides the highest mechanical properties for composite laminates. However, impregnating kevlar fibers with TiC nanoparticles did not enhance the anti-ballistic performance of composite laminates. Consequently, composite laminate that consists of Al-2024 and carbon fibers exhibits the best mechanical properties and anti-ballistic performance, making them the ideal choice for anti-ballistic applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纳米TiC浸渍和不浸渍铝/凯夫拉纤维复合层压板及铝/碳纤维复合层压板的研究
许多研究已经调查了使用由金属和纤维制成的复合层压板的优点,包括能够承受更重的负载,具有更好的抗冲击能力,更耐用,同时也很轻。在这个特殊的研究中,我们使用了手工铺层的方法来制造由三层铝合金和60层纤维组成的复合层压板。我们测试了三种不同类型的铝合金(Al-2024, Al-5052和Al-7075)和两种类型的纤维(凯夫拉纤维和碳),分为三类:凯夫拉纤维,TiC纳米颗粒浸渍凯夫拉纤维和碳纤维。然后,我们将每种类型的纤维与每种类型的铝合金结合起来,制成九种不同的复合层压板。为了确定层压板的力学性能,我们使用了混合规则公式。研究表明,在提高复合材料层合板的屈服强度和极限拉伸强度方面,芳纶纤维比碳纤维具有更显著的作用。而碳纤维对复合材料弹性模量的影响较大。在所有类型的铝中,Al-2024为复合层压板提供了最高的机械性能。然而,用TiC纳米粒子浸渍凯夫拉纤维并不能提高复合材料层合板的抗弹道性能。因此,由Al-2024和碳纤维组成的复合层压板具有最佳的机械性能和反弹道性能,使其成为反弹道应用的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture
International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Modeling and investigation of combined processes of casting, rolling, and extrusion to produce electrical wire from alloys Al–Zr system Characteristics of phases and processing techniques of high entropy alloys Editorial Board Microstructural, Electrochemical, and Hot Corrosion Analysis of CoCrFeCuTi High Entropy Alloy Reinforced Titanium Matrix Composites synthesized by Microwave Sintering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1