R400: A novel gene signature for dose prediction in radiation exposure studies in humans

Frederick St. Peter, Srinivas Mukund Vadrev, O. Soufan
{"title":"R400: A novel gene signature for dose prediction in radiation exposure studies in humans","authors":"Frederick St. Peter, Srinivas Mukund Vadrev, O. Soufan","doi":"10.3389/fsysb.2022.1022486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radiation’s harmful effects on biological organisms have long been studied through mainly evaluating pathological changes in cells, tissues, or organs. Recently, there have been more accessible gene expression datasets relating to radiation exposure studies. This provides an opportunity to analyze responses at the molecular level toward revealing phenotypic differences. Biomarkers in toxicogenomics have been suggested as indicators of radiation exposure and seem to react differently to various dosages of radiation. This study proposes a predictive gene signature specific to radiation exposure and can be used in automatically diagnosing the exposure dose. In searching for a reliable gene set that will correctly identify the exposure dose, consideration needs to be given to the size of the set. For this reason, we experimented with the number of genes used for training and testing. Gene set sizes of 28, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 and 1,000 were tested to find the size that provided the best accuracy across three datasets. Models were then trained and tested using multiple datasets in various ways, including an external validation. The dissimilarities between these datasets provide an analogy to real-world conditions where data from multiple sources are likely to have variances in format, settings, time parameters, participants, processes, and machine tolerances, so a robust training dataset from many heterogeneous samples should provide better predictability. All three datasets showed positive results with the correct classification of the radiation exposure dose. The average accuracy of all three models was 88% for gene sets of both 400 and 1,000 genes. R400 provided the best results when testing the three datasets used in this study. A literature validation of top selected genes shows high relevance of perturbations to adverse effects reported during cancer radiotherapy.","PeriodicalId":73109,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in systems biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in systems biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsysb.2022.1022486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiation’s harmful effects on biological organisms have long been studied through mainly evaluating pathological changes in cells, tissues, or organs. Recently, there have been more accessible gene expression datasets relating to radiation exposure studies. This provides an opportunity to analyze responses at the molecular level toward revealing phenotypic differences. Biomarkers in toxicogenomics have been suggested as indicators of radiation exposure and seem to react differently to various dosages of radiation. This study proposes a predictive gene signature specific to radiation exposure and can be used in automatically diagnosing the exposure dose. In searching for a reliable gene set that will correctly identify the exposure dose, consideration needs to be given to the size of the set. For this reason, we experimented with the number of genes used for training and testing. Gene set sizes of 28, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 and 1,000 were tested to find the size that provided the best accuracy across three datasets. Models were then trained and tested using multiple datasets in various ways, including an external validation. The dissimilarities between these datasets provide an analogy to real-world conditions where data from multiple sources are likely to have variances in format, settings, time parameters, participants, processes, and machine tolerances, so a robust training dataset from many heterogeneous samples should provide better predictability. All three datasets showed positive results with the correct classification of the radiation exposure dose. The average accuracy of all three models was 88% for gene sets of both 400 and 1,000 genes. R400 provided the best results when testing the three datasets used in this study. A literature validation of top selected genes shows high relevance of perturbations to adverse effects reported during cancer radiotherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
R400:人类辐射照射研究中剂量预测的新基因标记
长期以来,人们主要通过评价细胞、组织或器官的病理变化来研究辐射对生物有机体的有害影响。最近,与辐射暴露研究有关的基因表达数据集更加容易获取。这为在分子水平上分析反应以揭示表型差异提供了机会。毒物基因组学中的生物标志物已被认为是辐射暴露的指标,并且似乎对不同剂量的辐射有不同的反应。本研究提出了辐射暴露特异性的预测基因标记,可用于辐射剂量的自动诊断。在寻找能够正确识别暴露剂量的可靠基因集时,需要考虑到该基因集的大小。出于这个原因,我们对用于训练和测试的基因数量进行了实验。测试了28、100、200、300、400、500、600、700、800、900和1000个基因集的大小,以找到在三个数据集中提供最佳准确性的大小。然后使用多个数据集以各种方式训练和测试模型,包括外部验证。这些数据集之间的差异与现实世界的情况类似,其中来自多个来源的数据可能在格式、设置、时间参数、参与者、过程和机器公差方面存在差异,因此来自许多异构样本的健壮训练数据集应该提供更好的可预测性。所有三个数据集都显示了正确的辐射照射剂量分类的积极结果。对于包含400个和1000个基因的基因集,这三种模型的平均准确率为88%。在测试本研究中使用的三个数据集时,R400提供了最好的结果。文献验证的首选基因显示高度相关的扰动与癌症放疗期间报道的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transporter annotations are holding up progress in metabolic modeling Life’s building blocks: the modular path to multiscale complexity Coupling quantitative systems pharmacology modelling to machine learning and artificial intelligence for drug development: its pAIns and gAIns Predicting chronic responses to calcium channel blockade with a virtual population of African Americans with hypertensive chronic kidney disease Building an Adverse Outcome Pathway network for COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1