The Risk Factors of Unplanned Hospital Readmission Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM Pub Date : 2021-04-30 DOI:10.4274/JAREM.GALENOS.2021.3915
Y. O. Danacıoğlu, D. N. Özlü, F. Akkaş, Mustafa Gürkan Yenice, A. Taşçi
{"title":"The Risk Factors of Unplanned Hospital Readmission Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy","authors":"Y. O. Danacıoğlu, D. N. Özlü, F. Akkaş, Mustafa Gürkan Yenice, A. Taşçi","doi":"10.4274/JAREM.GALENOS.2021.3915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is currently recommended as the first treatment option for complex kidney stones larger than 2 cm. Although it is a safe and effective treatment, emergency room admissions and hospitalisations occur because of PNL complications. This study aimed to examine patient-related independent risk factors that may cause unplanned hospital readmission after PNL. Methods: Data of patients who were admitted to our clinic due to upper urinary system calculi and underwent conventional PNL operation between January 2015 and December 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Hospital readmission was defined as unscheduled rehospitalisation within 30 days after discharge. The study cohort was divided into two groups: the readmission (group A) and non-readmission groups (group B). Post-operative complication scoring was performed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate independent prognostic risk factors on readmission after PNL. Results: A total of 390 patients were included in our study. Of patients, 24 (6.1%) were readmitted to our clinic in the post-operative period. Gender, age, body mass index and stone volume were statistically similar between the groups. Based on multivariate analysis, the presence of Clavien 3a and 3b complications, post-operative blood transfusion, presence of preoperative hydronephrosis, American Society of Anaesthesiologist score and low stone density (<859 Hounsfield units) were determined as significant independent risk factors for readmission. Conclusion: Determination of preoperative risk factors will reduce hospital readmissions rates, thus reducing the potential burden on the health system and increasing patient comfort.","PeriodicalId":56162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM","volume":"11 1","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/JAREM.GALENOS.2021.3915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is currently recommended as the first treatment option for complex kidney stones larger than 2 cm. Although it is a safe and effective treatment, emergency room admissions and hospitalisations occur because of PNL complications. This study aimed to examine patient-related independent risk factors that may cause unplanned hospital readmission after PNL. Methods: Data of patients who were admitted to our clinic due to upper urinary system calculi and underwent conventional PNL operation between January 2015 and December 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Hospital readmission was defined as unscheduled rehospitalisation within 30 days after discharge. The study cohort was divided into two groups: the readmission (group A) and non-readmission groups (group B). Post-operative complication scoring was performed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate independent prognostic risk factors on readmission after PNL. Results: A total of 390 patients were included in our study. Of patients, 24 (6.1%) were readmitted to our clinic in the post-operative period. Gender, age, body mass index and stone volume were statistically similar between the groups. Based on multivariate analysis, the presence of Clavien 3a and 3b complications, post-operative blood transfusion, presence of preoperative hydronephrosis, American Society of Anaesthesiologist score and low stone density (<859 Hounsfield units) were determined as significant independent risk factors for readmission. Conclusion: Determination of preoperative risk factors will reduce hospital readmissions rates, thus reducing the potential burden on the health system and increasing patient comfort.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮肾镜取石术后意外再入院的危险因素
目的:经皮肾取石术(PNL)目前被推荐为2厘米以上复杂肾结石的首选治疗方法。尽管它是一种安全有效的治疗方法,但由于PNL并发症,急诊室和住院都会发生。本研究旨在检查PNL后可能导致计划外再次入院的患者相关独立风险因素。方法:回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年12月因上尿路结石入院并接受常规PNL手术的患者资料。再次入院被定义为出院后30天内的计划外再住院。研究队列分为两组:再次入院组(A组)和非再次入院组。根据Clavien-Dindo分类进行术后并发症评分。多变量逻辑回归分析用于评估PNL后再次入院的独立预后危险因素。结果:本研究共纳入390例患者。在患者中,24例(6.1%)在术后再次入院。两组之间的性别、年龄、体重指数和结石体积在统计学上相似。基于多变量分析,Clavien 3a和3b并发症的存在、术后输血、术前肾积水的存在、美国麻醉师协会评分和低结石密度(<859 Hounsfield单位)被确定为再次入院的重要独立危险因素。结论:术前危险因素的确定将降低住院率,从而减轻卫生系统的潜在负担,增加患者的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM
Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Relationship Between the Protrusion of the Optic Nerve and Internal Carotid Artery and Sphenoid Sinus Volume Would Women Who Have Been Informed About Automated Breast Ultrasound Prefer This Method to Manuel Ultrasound? Cyberchondria’s Possible Relationship with Problematic Internet Use and eHealth Literacy Prediction of Difficulty Level of Laparoscopic Cholecistectomy According to Preoperative Findings Synthesis of Graphene Oxide and Evaluation of Its Cytotoxic Effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1