{"title":"Use of Research Organizations Registry (ROR) identifiers in author academic profiles: the case of Google Scholar Profiles","authors":"E. Orduña-Malea, N. Bautista-Puig","doi":"10.31009/hipertext.net.2022.i25.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research organizations' persistent identifiers allow for reducing affiliation ambiguities, enable accurate institutional analyses and favor the design of modern online scholarly databases suited for research discovery and research evaluation. However, few studies have attempted to quantify their degree of use. Precisely, the purpose of this work is to determine the use of Research Organizations Registry (ROR) IDs in author academic profiles, specifically in Google Scholar Profiles (GSP). To do this, all the Google Scholar profiles including the term ROR in any of the public descriptive fields were collected and analyzed. The results evidence a low use of ROR IDs (1,033 profiles), mainly from a few institutions (e.g. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Colombia, and Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral in Ecuador hold 55.7% of all profiles), from low citation-based impact authors (45.1% of profiles attain less than 100 citations each), belonging mainly to Social Sciences (26.3%), Engineering fields (25.3%), and Natural Sciences (22.2%). Although Google Scholar does not facilitate the inclusion of identifiers, it seems that the world's leading research institutions are not recommending their researchers include these identifiers in their profiles yet.","PeriodicalId":53242,"journal":{"name":"Hipertextnet","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hipertextnet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2022.i25.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research organizations' persistent identifiers allow for reducing affiliation ambiguities, enable accurate institutional analyses and favor the design of modern online scholarly databases suited for research discovery and research evaluation. However, few studies have attempted to quantify their degree of use. Precisely, the purpose of this work is to determine the use of Research Organizations Registry (ROR) IDs in author academic profiles, specifically in Google Scholar Profiles (GSP). To do this, all the Google Scholar profiles including the term ROR in any of the public descriptive fields were collected and analyzed. The results evidence a low use of ROR IDs (1,033 profiles), mainly from a few institutions (e.g. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Colombia, and Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral in Ecuador hold 55.7% of all profiles), from low citation-based impact authors (45.1% of profiles attain less than 100 citations each), belonging mainly to Social Sciences (26.3%), Engineering fields (25.3%), and Natural Sciences (22.2%). Although Google Scholar does not facilitate the inclusion of identifiers, it seems that the world's leading research institutions are not recommending their researchers include these identifiers in their profiles yet.
研究机构的持久标识符允许减少隶属关系的模糊性,实现准确的机构分析,并有利于设计适合研究发现和研究评估的现代在线学术数据库。然而,很少有研究试图量化它们的使用程度。准确地说,这项工作的目的是确定研究组织注册(ROR) id在作者学术档案中的使用,特别是在谷歌学者档案(GSP)中。为此,收集并分析了所有谷歌Scholar配置文件,其中包括任何公共描述字段中的术语ROR。结果表明,ROR id的使用率较低(1033篇),主要来自少数机构(例如哥伦比亚的Pontificia Universidad Javeriana,厄瓜多尔的Escuela Superior politcnica del Litoral占所有档案的55.7%),来自低引用影响作者(45.1%的档案每个引用少于100次),主要属于社会科学(26.3%),工程领域(25.3%)和自然科学(22.2%)。虽然谷歌Scholar没有促进标识符的包含,但似乎世界领先的研究机构还没有建议他们的研究人员在他们的个人资料中包含这些标识符。