Use of Research Organizations Registry (ROR) identifiers in author academic profiles: the case of Google Scholar Profiles

E. Orduña-Malea, N. Bautista-Puig
{"title":"Use of Research Organizations Registry (ROR) identifiers in author academic profiles: the case of Google Scholar Profiles","authors":"E. Orduña-Malea, N. Bautista-Puig","doi":"10.31009/hipertext.net.2022.i25.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research organizations' persistent identifiers allow for reducing affiliation ambiguities, enable accurate institutional analyses and favor the design of modern online scholarly databases suited for research discovery and research evaluation. However, few studies have attempted to quantify their degree of use. Precisely, the purpose of this work is to determine the use of Research Organizations Registry (ROR) IDs in author academic profiles, specifically in Google Scholar Profiles (GSP). To do this, all the Google Scholar profiles including the term ROR in any of the public descriptive fields were collected and analyzed. The results evidence a low use of ROR IDs (1,033 profiles), mainly from a few institutions (e.g. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Colombia, and Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral in Ecuador hold 55.7% of all profiles), from low citation-based impact authors (45.1% of profiles attain less than 100 citations each), belonging mainly to Social Sciences (26.3%), Engineering fields (25.3%), and Natural Sciences (22.2%). Although Google Scholar does not facilitate the inclusion of identifiers, it seems that the world's leading research institutions are not recommending their researchers include these identifiers in their profiles yet.","PeriodicalId":53242,"journal":{"name":"Hipertextnet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hipertextnet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2022.i25.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research organizations' persistent identifiers allow for reducing affiliation ambiguities, enable accurate institutional analyses and favor the design of modern online scholarly databases suited for research discovery and research evaluation. However, few studies have attempted to quantify their degree of use. Precisely, the purpose of this work is to determine the use of Research Organizations Registry (ROR) IDs in author academic profiles, specifically in Google Scholar Profiles (GSP). To do this, all the Google Scholar profiles including the term ROR in any of the public descriptive fields were collected and analyzed. The results evidence a low use of ROR IDs (1,033 profiles), mainly from a few institutions (e.g. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Colombia, and Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral in Ecuador hold 55.7% of all profiles), from low citation-based impact authors (45.1% of profiles attain less than 100 citations each), belonging mainly to Social Sciences (26.3%), Engineering fields (25.3%), and Natural Sciences (22.2%). Although Google Scholar does not facilitate the inclusion of identifiers, it seems that the world's leading research institutions are not recommending their researchers include these identifiers in their profiles yet.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在作者学术档案中使用研究组织注册(ROR)标识符:以谷歌学者档案为例
研究机构的持久标识符允许减少隶属关系的模糊性,实现准确的机构分析,并有利于设计适合研究发现和研究评估的现代在线学术数据库。然而,很少有研究试图量化它们的使用程度。准确地说,这项工作的目的是确定研究组织注册(ROR) id在作者学术档案中的使用,特别是在谷歌学者档案(GSP)中。为此,收集并分析了所有谷歌Scholar配置文件,其中包括任何公共描述字段中的术语ROR。结果表明,ROR id的使用率较低(1033篇),主要来自少数机构(例如哥伦比亚的Pontificia Universidad Javeriana,厄瓜多尔的Escuela Superior politcnica del Litoral占所有档案的55.7%),来自低引用影响作者(45.1%的档案每个引用少于100次),主要属于社会科学(26.3%),工程领域(25.3%)和自然科学(22.2%)。虽然谷歌Scholar没有促进标识符的包含,但似乎世界领先的研究机构还没有建议他们的研究人员在他们的个人资料中包含这些标识符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interface design and transmedia ideals, logics, and values in pandemic Breve panorama de investigaciones y estudios sobre las redes sociales digitales para el encuentro socioafectivo y su aproximación teórica- metodológica con los estudios feministas y de género. El futuro de la alfabetización visual: Evaluación de la detección de imágenes generadas por inteligencia artificial Un vínculo paradójico: narrativas audiovisuales generadas por inteligencia artificial, entre el pastiche y la cancelación del futuro El impacto de los influencers en el periodismo: estudio de caso y caracterización
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1