Why Do Teachers Connect Better With Some Students Than Others? Exploring the Influence of Teachers’ Creative-Thinking Preferences

Q3 Social Sciences Gifted and Talented International Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/15332276.2019.1684221
Serap Gurak-Ozdemir, Selcuk Acar, G. Puccio, Cory Wright
{"title":"Why Do Teachers Connect Better With Some Students Than Others? Exploring the Influence of Teachers’ Creative-Thinking Preferences","authors":"Serap Gurak-Ozdemir, Selcuk Acar, G. Puccio, Cory Wright","doi":"10.1080/15332276.2019.1684221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Teacher–student connection is influenced by several factors and one possible factor is teachers’ creative - thinking preferences (CTP). The present study investigated the extent to which teachers’ CTP predicts their view of favorable student characteristics. Teachers’ CTP was measured by FourSight that featured four preferences: clarifying, ideating, developing, and implementing. Two hundred seventy-five teachers in the United States completed the FourSight measure and the Torrance Ideal Child Checklist. This checklist of 66 adjectives asks the respondent to identify qualities that should be encouraged or discouraged in their students. Results showed that teachers have a tendency to support characteristics associated with their own preference. Specifically, teachers with a stronger Ideator preference showed a clear tendency to encourage ideating qualities among students over Developer and Implementer characteristics. In sharp contrast, teachers with higher Clarifier preferences did not favor ideating qualities. The results reveal an implicit bias on the part of teachers to promote qualities that align most with their own creative-thinking preferences. These findings underscore the importance of teacher training that promotes awareness of this creative thinking preference.","PeriodicalId":52310,"journal":{"name":"Gifted and Talented International","volume":"34 1","pages":"102 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15332276.2019.1684221","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted and Talented International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2019.1684221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Teacher–student connection is influenced by several factors and one possible factor is teachers’ creative - thinking preferences (CTP). The present study investigated the extent to which teachers’ CTP predicts their view of favorable student characteristics. Teachers’ CTP was measured by FourSight that featured four preferences: clarifying, ideating, developing, and implementing. Two hundred seventy-five teachers in the United States completed the FourSight measure and the Torrance Ideal Child Checklist. This checklist of 66 adjectives asks the respondent to identify qualities that should be encouraged or discouraged in their students. Results showed that teachers have a tendency to support characteristics associated with their own preference. Specifically, teachers with a stronger Ideator preference showed a clear tendency to encourage ideating qualities among students over Developer and Implementer characteristics. In sharp contrast, teachers with higher Clarifier preferences did not favor ideating qualities. The results reveal an implicit bias on the part of teachers to promote qualities that align most with their own creative-thinking preferences. These findings underscore the importance of teacher training that promotes awareness of this creative thinking preference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么老师与一些学生的关系比其他学生好?探究教师创造性思维偏好的影响
师生关系受多种因素的影响,其中一个可能的因素是教师的创造性思维偏好。本研究探讨了教师的CTP在多大程度上预测其对学生有利特征的看法。教师的CTP是由FourSight测量的,有四种偏好:澄清、构思、发展和实施。美国有275名教师完成了FourSight量表和Torrance理想儿童检查表。这份由66个形容词组成的清单要求被调查者确定学生身上应该鼓励或不鼓励的品质。结果显示,教师倾向于支持与自己偏好相关的特征。具体而言,具有更强的概念者偏好的教师明显倾向于鼓励学生的概念品质,而不是开发者和实施者的特征。与之形成鲜明对比的是,具有较高澄清偏好的教师不喜欢理想化的品质。研究结果揭示了教师的一种隐性偏见,即提倡与他们自己的创造性思维偏好最一致的品质。这些发现强调了教师培训的重要性,以促进对这种创造性思维偏好的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gifted and Talented International
Gifted and Talented International Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
The identification of primary school students who are gifted in science Voices of twice exceptional students in their first year of higher education Strategies that parents of gifted children use in tense situations with teachers in mixed-ability classes University-based Mentoring Program for School Going Gifted Students Evaluation of the dimensions of the Mawhiba-IAU summer enrichment program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1