From a willing partner to close political and economic partner: analysing EU political elites’ images of Georgia from 1991 to 2020

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES European Security Pub Date : 2021-10-14 DOI:10.1080/09662839.2021.1987892
N. Gamkrelidze
{"title":"From a willing partner to close political and economic partner: analysing EU political elites’ images of Georgia from 1991 to 2020","authors":"N. Gamkrelidze","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2021.1987892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores EU political elites' images of Georgia and its evolution from 1991 to 2020. The analysis relies on the author’s 25 original interviews with EU political elites, including presidents, prime ministers and ministers of EU member states and EU commissioners, alongside primary documents. By triangulating between novel interview data, document analysis and statements by EU officials, this article unpacks EU perceptions of Georgia’s intentions, capabilities, threats and cultural status over a 30-year historical period. The study shows that three main images of Georgia have emerged over time in the eyes of EU and EU member states leaders: first, Georgia as a willing partner to the EU; second, Georgia as a political partner to the EU and third, Georgia as a close political and economic partner to the EU. This article, by studying the EU political elites’ images of Georgia, adds knowledge to the EU’s perceptions of external actors, which is an under-researched topic in the scholarship of images and perceptions in EU external relations. Moreover, it extends the literature on EU–Georgia relations, and helps to understand some of their peculiarities.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"31 1","pages":"200 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Security","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1987892","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores EU political elites' images of Georgia and its evolution from 1991 to 2020. The analysis relies on the author’s 25 original interviews with EU political elites, including presidents, prime ministers and ministers of EU member states and EU commissioners, alongside primary documents. By triangulating between novel interview data, document analysis and statements by EU officials, this article unpacks EU perceptions of Georgia’s intentions, capabilities, threats and cultural status over a 30-year historical period. The study shows that three main images of Georgia have emerged over time in the eyes of EU and EU member states leaders: first, Georgia as a willing partner to the EU; second, Georgia as a political partner to the EU and third, Georgia as a close political and economic partner to the EU. This article, by studying the EU political elites’ images of Georgia, adds knowledge to the EU’s perceptions of external actors, which is an under-researched topic in the scholarship of images and perceptions in EU external relations. Moreover, it extends the literature on EU–Georgia relations, and helps to understand some of their peculiarities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从自愿合作伙伴到密切的政治和经济合作伙伴:分析1991年至2020年欧盟政治精英对格鲁吉亚的印象
本文探讨了欧盟政治精英对格鲁吉亚的印象及其从1991年到2020年的演变。该分析依赖于作者对欧盟政治精英的25次原始采访,包括欧盟成员国的总统、总理、部长和欧盟委员,以及主要文件。通过对新颖的访谈数据、文件分析和欧盟官员的陈述进行三角分析,本文揭示了欧盟在30年历史时期对格鲁吉亚意图、能力、威胁和文化地位的看法。研究表明,随着时间的推移,格鲁吉亚在欧盟和欧盟成员国领导人眼中出现了三种主要形象:首先,格鲁吉亚是欧盟的自愿合作伙伴;第二,格鲁吉亚是欧盟的政治伙伴;第三,格鲁吉亚是欧盟密切的政治和经济伙伴。本文通过研究欧盟政治精英对格鲁吉亚的形象,增加了欧盟对外部行为者的看法的知识,这是欧盟对外关系中形象和看法的学术研究中一个缺乏研究的话题。此外,它扩展了关于欧盟-格鲁吉亚关系的文献,并有助于理解他们的一些特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Security
European Security Multiple-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Upon entering NATO: explaining defence willingness among Swedes Instrumentalisation of fear and securitisation of “Eastern Borders Route”: the case of Poland-Belarus “border crisis” Serbia between East and West: ontological security, vicarious identity and the problem of sanctions against Russia External, non-governmental resistance in relation to interstate war: an analytical framework Improved conceptualising of hybrid interference below the threshold of armed conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1