Associations of plant-based dietary patterns with cardiovascular risk factors in women

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research Pub Date : 2022-02-26 DOI:10.34172/jcvtr.2022.01
Zahra Shirzadi, E. Daneshzad, Ahmad-Raza Dorosty, P. Surkan, L. Azadbakht
{"title":"Associations of plant-based dietary patterns with cardiovascular risk factors in women","authors":"Zahra Shirzadi, E. Daneshzad, Ahmad-Raza Dorosty, P. Surkan, L. Azadbakht","doi":"10.34172/jcvtr.2022.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Given that some plant-based foods, such as potatoes, adversely affect cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, this study was performed to assess the association between plant dietary patterns and these risk factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 371 healthy 18 to 50 year-old Iranian women. Participant dietary intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire. Nineteen food groups were ranked in deciles and received scores from 1 to 10. An overall plant-based dietary index (PDI), a healthy plant-based dietary index (hPDI), and an unhealthy plant-based dietary index (uPDI) were calculated. Results: Participants who scored in the top tertile of the PDI or uPDI consumed less fat and protein and more carbohydrates, compared to women in the lowest tertile (P < 0.05). There was no significant variation in macronutrient consumption between the highest and lowest tertiles of hPDI. Participants who scored in the highest tertile of PDI had lower low density cholesterol level (LDL) (79.61 ± 14.36 mg dL−1 vs. 83.01 ± 14.96 mg/dL−1, P = 0.021). In addition, higher adherence to uPDI was associated with higher triglyceride (TG) levels compared to participants with lower adherence (101.5 ± 56.55 mg/dL−1 vs. 97.70 ± 56.46 mg dL−1, P < 0.0001). Here was no significant association between PDI, hPDI and uPDI and CVD risk factors in regression model. Conclusion: We found no significant association between plant-based dietary indices and CVD risk factors in women, except for LDL-C and TG. Future cohort studies are needed to confirm these findings.","PeriodicalId":15207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"1 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.2022.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Given that some plant-based foods, such as potatoes, adversely affect cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, this study was performed to assess the association between plant dietary patterns and these risk factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 371 healthy 18 to 50 year-old Iranian women. Participant dietary intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire. Nineteen food groups were ranked in deciles and received scores from 1 to 10. An overall plant-based dietary index (PDI), a healthy plant-based dietary index (hPDI), and an unhealthy plant-based dietary index (uPDI) were calculated. Results: Participants who scored in the top tertile of the PDI or uPDI consumed less fat and protein and more carbohydrates, compared to women in the lowest tertile (P < 0.05). There was no significant variation in macronutrient consumption between the highest and lowest tertiles of hPDI. Participants who scored in the highest tertile of PDI had lower low density cholesterol level (LDL) (79.61 ± 14.36 mg dL−1 vs. 83.01 ± 14.96 mg/dL−1, P = 0.021). In addition, higher adherence to uPDI was associated with higher triglyceride (TG) levels compared to participants with lower adherence (101.5 ± 56.55 mg/dL−1 vs. 97.70 ± 56.46 mg dL−1, P < 0.0001). Here was no significant association between PDI, hPDI and uPDI and CVD risk factors in regression model. Conclusion: We found no significant association between plant-based dietary indices and CVD risk factors in women, except for LDL-C and TG. Future cohort studies are needed to confirm these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物性饮食模式与女性心血管危险因素的关系
引言:鉴于一些植物性食物,如土豆,会对心血管疾病(CVD)的风险因素产生不利影响,本研究旨在评估植物性饮食模式与这些风险因素之间的关系。方法:这项横断面研究在371名18至50岁的健康伊朗妇女中进行。使用经验证的食物频率问卷对参与者的饮食摄入量进行评估。19个食物组按十分位数排列,得分从1到10。计算了总体植物性膳食指数(PDI)、健康植物性膳食指标(hPDI)和不健康植物性饮食指数(uPDI)。结果:与最低三分位数的女性相比,PDI或uPDI得分最高的三分位数参与者消耗的脂肪、蛋白质和碳水化合物更少(P<0.05)。hPDI最高和最低三分位之间的常量营养素消耗没有显著差异。PDI得分最高的参与者低密度胆固醇水平较低(79.61±14.36 mg dL−1 vs.83.01±14.96 mg/dL−1,P=0.021)。此外,与依从性较低的参与者相比,对uPDI的依从性较高与甘油三酯(TG)水平较高相关(101.5±56.55 mg/dL−1 vs.97.70±56.46 mg/dL–1,P<0.0001)。在回归模型中,PDI、hPDI和uPDI与CVD危险因素之间没有显着关联。结论:除了LDL-C和TG外,我们没有发现植物性饮食指数与女性心血管疾病风险因素之间存在显著关联。需要未来的队列研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the relationship between lactate levels during coronary artery bypass graft surgery and postoperative renal dysfunction. Genetic association of FTO gene polymorphisms with obesity and its related phenotypes: A case-control study. Risk estimation of cardiovascular diseases using the World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension risk prediction charts in the Azar cohort population: Cross-sectional study. The role of probiotics on microvascular complications of type-2 diabetes: Nephropathy and retinopathy. Walking or breathing: comparing the 6-minute walking distance test to the pulmonary function test for lung resection candidates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1