Functional and radiological characteristics of asthma combined chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap

IF 1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Egyptian Journal of Bronchology Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.4103/ejb.ejb_14_19
Hamada Fayed, Yasen Abd-Elkareem, Wassem Samaha, Maher Abdalshakour
{"title":"Functional and radiological characteristics of asthma combined chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap","authors":"Hamada Fayed, Yasen Abd-Elkareem, Wassem Samaha, Maher Abdalshakour","doi":"10.4103/ejb.ejb_14_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Persons with asthma–chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) are a crucial but poorly characterized group. In spite of the numbers of patients with ACO have increased, there is minimal confirmed evidence regarding diagnostic features and choices of treatment. So, the aim of this study was to identify the physiological and radiological characteristics of patients with ACO. Patients and methods This study was performed on 200 patients classified into 38 patients diagnosed as having asthma, 132 patients diagnosed as having COPD, and 30 patients diagnosed as having ACO, who were chosen based on clinical features. All patients underwent pulmonary function tests, and multislice computed tomography imaging. Results The mean age of our study population was 61 years. The mean age in COPD group was higher compared with asthma and ACO groups (63.9±7.8 vs. 44.84±12.2 and 56.7±8, respectively), with a predominance of males in COPD and females in asthma, with a higher smoking index in patients with COPD than those with ACO and asthma (47.05±37.7, 13.53±2.2, and 2.47±1.46, respectively). Measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) by liters before bronchodilator therapy is greater in patients with asthma than ACO and COPD groups (1.89±0.42, 1.52±0.39, and 1.35±0.4, respectively), with highly significant difference (P<0.001). With airway reversibility, it is also greater in patients with asthma than ACO and COPD groups (2.85±0.49, 1.99±0.47, and 1.41±0.39, respectively), with a highly significant difference (P<0.001). Airway internal diameter of patients with COPD is greater than ACO and asthma groups (4.03±0.3, 3.92±0.17, and 2.82±0.31, respectively), with a highly significant difference (P<0.001). On the contrary, airway external diameter of patients with COPD is greater than asthma and ACO groups, with a highly significant difference (P<0.001). Airway wall thickness of patients with asthma is greater than ACO and COPD groups, with a highly statistical difference (P<0.001). There is no relation between thickness of airway wall and airway obstruction, expressed as FEV1 %predicted, in patients with asthma and COPD. This study results confirmed the correlation between the thickness of airway wall and airway obstruction, expressed as FEV1 %predicted, in patients with ACO. Conclusion Bronchial wall thickness measured by chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is increased in patients with asthma than those with ACO and COPD, with a high statistical significance.","PeriodicalId":34128,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_14_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background Persons with asthma–chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) are a crucial but poorly characterized group. In spite of the numbers of patients with ACO have increased, there is minimal confirmed evidence regarding diagnostic features and choices of treatment. So, the aim of this study was to identify the physiological and radiological characteristics of patients with ACO. Patients and methods This study was performed on 200 patients classified into 38 patients diagnosed as having asthma, 132 patients diagnosed as having COPD, and 30 patients diagnosed as having ACO, who were chosen based on clinical features. All patients underwent pulmonary function tests, and multislice computed tomography imaging. Results The mean age of our study population was 61 years. The mean age in COPD group was higher compared with asthma and ACO groups (63.9±7.8 vs. 44.84±12.2 and 56.7±8, respectively), with a predominance of males in COPD and females in asthma, with a higher smoking index in patients with COPD than those with ACO and asthma (47.05±37.7, 13.53±2.2, and 2.47±1.46, respectively). Measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) by liters before bronchodilator therapy is greater in patients with asthma than ACO and COPD groups (1.89±0.42, 1.52±0.39, and 1.35±0.4, respectively), with highly significant difference (P<0.001). With airway reversibility, it is also greater in patients with asthma than ACO and COPD groups (2.85±0.49, 1.99±0.47, and 1.41±0.39, respectively), with a highly significant difference (P<0.001). Airway internal diameter of patients with COPD is greater than ACO and asthma groups (4.03±0.3, 3.92±0.17, and 2.82±0.31, respectively), with a highly significant difference (P<0.001). On the contrary, airway external diameter of patients with COPD is greater than asthma and ACO groups, with a highly significant difference (P<0.001). Airway wall thickness of patients with asthma is greater than ACO and COPD groups, with a highly statistical difference (P<0.001). There is no relation between thickness of airway wall and airway obstruction, expressed as FEV1 %predicted, in patients with asthma and COPD. This study results confirmed the correlation between the thickness of airway wall and airway obstruction, expressed as FEV1 %predicted, in patients with ACO. Conclusion Bronchial wall thickness measured by chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is increased in patients with asthma than those with ACO and COPD, with a high statistical significance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哮喘合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病的功能和影像学特征重叠
哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)重叠(ACO)患者是一个重要但特征不明确的群体。尽管ACO患者的数量有所增加,但关于诊断特征和治疗选择的确凿证据很少。因此,本研究的目的是确定ACO患者的生理和放射学特征。患者与方法本研究共纳入200例患者,根据临床特征选择哮喘患者38例,COPD患者132例,ACO患者30例。所有患者都进行了肺功能检查和多层计算机断层扫描成像。结果研究人群的平均年龄为61岁。COPD组的平均年龄高于哮喘组和ACO组(分别为63.9±7.8比44.84±12.2和56.7±8),COPD组以男性为主,哮喘组以女性为主,COPD患者的吸烟指数高于ACO组和哮喘组(分别为47.05±37.7、13.53±2.2和2.47±1.46)。支气管扩张剂治疗前1 s用力呼气量(FEV1)(升)哮喘组高于ACO组和COPD组(分别为1.89±0.42、1.52±0.39、1.35±0.4),差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.001)。在气道可逆性方面,哮喘组也高于ACO组和COPD组(分别为2.85±0.49、1.99±0.47、1.41±0.39),差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.001)。COPD患者气道内径大于ACO组和哮喘组(分别为4.03±0.3、3.92±0.17、2.82±0.31),差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.001)。相反,COPD患者气道外径大于哮喘组和ACO组,差异极显著(P<0.001)。哮喘组气道壁厚大于ACO组和COPD组,差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.001)。在哮喘和COPD患者中,气道壁厚度与气道阻塞(以预测FEV1 %表示)没有关系。本研究结果证实了ACO患者气道壁厚度与气道阻塞之间的相关性,以预测FEV1 %表示。结论哮喘患者胸部高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)支气管壁厚较慢性阻塞性肺疾病(ACO)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者增高,差异有高度统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology
Egyptian Journal of Bronchology RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
7.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of atypical pneumonia by chest ultrasonography Safety and efficacy of high flow nasal canula in patients with mild hypercapnia Impact of comorbid pulmonary disease on COVID-19 disease severity and outcome: a retrospective cohort study Imaging changes of oil aspiration over time in children: a case series Diagnostic yield of combined ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy versus either technique alone in peripheral lung and pleural lesions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1