Epistemic Injustice in Propertius 1.3

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS ARETHUSA Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/are.2022.0006
Nick Ollivère
{"title":"Epistemic Injustice in Propertius 1.3","authors":"Nick Ollivère","doi":"10.1353/are.2022.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In Propertius 1.3 we hear Cynthia speak for the first time, in direct speech, accusing Propertius of infidelity. It is a striking moment in elegy, barely to be repeated. In this paper I want to explore what the framework of epistemic injustice, part of the field of epistemology, could mean for a reading of this dramatic encounter. As elaborated by the philosopher Miranda Fricker, the theory provides radical new insights into how we conceive of the relationship between knowers, how we acquire and share our knowledge, and the prejudices and assumptions behind these interactions.","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":"55 1","pages":"121 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2022.0006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In Propertius 1.3 we hear Cynthia speak for the first time, in direct speech, accusing Propertius of infidelity. It is a striking moment in elegy, barely to be repeated. In this paper I want to explore what the framework of epistemic injustice, part of the field of epistemology, could mean for a reading of this dramatic encounter. As elaborated by the philosopher Miranda Fricker, the theory provides radical new insights into how we conceive of the relationship between knowers, how we acquire and share our knowledge, and the prejudices and assumptions behind these interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Propertius 1.3中的认识论不公正
摘要:在《Propertius》1.3中,我们第一次听到辛西娅用直接引语指责Propertius不忠。这是一首悲歌中令人震惊的时刻,几乎无法重复。在本文中,我想探讨认识论不公正的框架,认识论领域的一部分,对于阅读这一戏剧性的遭遇可能意味着什么。正如哲学家米兰达·弗里克(Miranda Fricker)所阐述的那样,该理论为我们如何理解知者之间的关系、我们如何获取和分享知识以及这些互动背后的偏见和假设提供了全新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ARETHUSA
ARETHUSA CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.
期刊最新文献
A New Musical Helen Musical Structure in Greek Tragedy: Introduction Performing Aeschylus's Persians Musical Structure and the Interpretability of Agamemnon 1513–20 From the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1