Scarcity tactics in marketing: A meta-analysis of product scarcity effects on consumer purchase intentions

IF 8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jretai.2022.06.003
Belinda Barton , Natalina Zlatevska , Harmen Oppewal
{"title":"Scarcity tactics in marketing: A meta-analysis of product scarcity effects on consumer purchase intentions","authors":"Belinda Barton ,&nbsp;Natalina Zlatevska ,&nbsp;Harmen Oppewal","doi":"10.1016/j.jretai.2022.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scarcity tactics are an essential tool for marketers. Cues that signal the current or potential unavailability of a product generally enhance its value and desirability and in turn increase purchase intentions. While there have been earlier reviews, the fragmented nature of the research to date means there is no cohesion across findings. Given that retailers employ a variety of scarcity cues in a diversity of settings, it is important to identify the magnitude of the effect of scarcity cues and how the effect on consumers’ purchase intentions changes across conditions. This research presents a meta-analysis of 416 effect sizes from 131 studies. Results show that demand-based scarcity is most effective for utilitarian products, supply-based scarcity for experiences, and time-based scarcity for high involvement products. The results show that managers need to consider the above factors to maximize the success of scarcity tactics in their marketing campaigns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing","volume":"98 4","pages":"Pages 741-758"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435922000434/pdfft?md5=da46a5ad2c3b534d098f069d87c224d5&pid=1-s2.0-S0022435922000434-main.pdf","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435922000434","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Scarcity tactics are an essential tool for marketers. Cues that signal the current or potential unavailability of a product generally enhance its value and desirability and in turn increase purchase intentions. While there have been earlier reviews, the fragmented nature of the research to date means there is no cohesion across findings. Given that retailers employ a variety of scarcity cues in a diversity of settings, it is important to identify the magnitude of the effect of scarcity cues and how the effect on consumers’ purchase intentions changes across conditions. This research presents a meta-analysis of 416 effect sizes from 131 studies. Results show that demand-based scarcity is most effective for utilitarian products, supply-based scarcity for experiences, and time-based scarcity for high involvement products. The results show that managers need to consider the above factors to maximize the success of scarcity tactics in their marketing campaigns.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
营销中的稀缺策略:产品稀缺性对消费者购买意愿影响的荟萃分析
稀缺性策略是营销人员必不可少的工具。暗示产品当前或潜在不可获得性的线索通常会提高其价值和可取性,从而增加购买意愿。虽然早前有过评论,但迄今为止研究的碎片性意味着研究结果之间没有连贯性。考虑到零售商在不同的环境中使用各种稀缺线索,确定稀缺线索的影响程度以及对消费者购买意愿的影响如何在不同条件下变化是很重要的。本研究对131项研究的416个效应量进行了荟萃分析。结果表明,基于需求的稀缺性对功利性产品最为有效,基于供给的稀缺性对体验最为有效,基于时间的稀缺性对高介入产品最为有效。研究结果表明,管理者需要考虑上述因素,才能使稀缺策略在营销活动中取得最大的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The focus of The Journal of Retailing is to advance knowledge and its practical application in the field of retailing. This includes various aspects such as retail management, evolution, and current theories. The journal covers both products and services in retail, supply chains and distribution channels that serve retailers, relationships between retailers and supply chain members, and direct marketing as well as emerging electronic markets for households. Articles published in the journal may take an economic or behavioral approach, but all are based on rigorous analysis and a deep understanding of relevant theories and existing literature. Empirical research follows the scientific method, employing modern sampling procedures and statistical analysis.
期刊最新文献
Bargaining with algorithms: How consumers respond to offers proposed by algorithms versus humans Quiet sellers: When introversion drives salesperson performance Understanding shoppers’ attention to price information at the point of consideration using in-store ambulatory eye-tracking FM ii: Copyright/ ID Statement Navigating the complexities of retail mergers in a changing landscape: A call for deeper insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1