Updating Ravenstein: Internal Migration as a Driver of Regional Population Change in the Wider South East of England

IF 1.5 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Comparative Population Studies Pub Date : 2020-03-23 DOI:10.12765/CPOS-2020-05EN
T. Champion
{"title":"Updating Ravenstein: Internal Migration as a Driver of Regional Population Change in the Wider South East of England","authors":"T. Champion","doi":"10.12765/CPOS-2020-05EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Key among Ravenstein’s “laws”, derived from extensive analysis of mid-19th century migration patterns in the British Isles, are that the majority of migrants go only a short distance and that migration proceeds stepwise as a sequence of localised population shifts towards the principal centres of commerce and industry. This paper tests these two laws in the 21st century context of counterurbanisation by reference to migration taking place within the Wider South East (WSE) of England, being the region dominated by deconcentration pressures emanating from London. It comprises two sets of empirical analyses using migration data for the period 2001-2016. Firstly, these data are aggregated to a set of broadly concentric rings around this core and analysed to reveal how much of the net outward shifts of population produced by this migration arises from net movement taking place between adjacent rings as a type of cascade as opposed to leapfrogging directly from the core into a non-adjacent ring. Cascading is found to predominate at this scale, confirming the continued importance of shorter-distance moving. Secondly, the migration data are rendered into a Travel to Work Area (TTWA) framework to examine the extent to which these subdivisions of the WSE perform a type of entrepôt role in helping to shift population outwards from London. Drawing on Ravenstein’s concepts of counties of “transfer” and “absorption”, two measures are developed for revealing how the net inflow to a particular TTWA from rings closer to the core compares numerically with the net outflow from that TTWA to the rings further away from it. The derived transfer and absorption rates are then used to classify the TTWAs into four groups according to whether their scores on each are above or below average. It is found that a TTWA’s role varies according to two main dimensions: the concentric zone to which it belongs and the radial sector out of London in which it is located, notably whether the sector has a coastal or landward border. \n* This article belongs to a special issue on “Internal Migration as a Driver of Regional Population Change in Europe: Updating Ravenstein”.","PeriodicalId":44592,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Population Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Population Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12765/CPOS-2020-05EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Key among Ravenstein’s “laws”, derived from extensive analysis of mid-19th century migration patterns in the British Isles, are that the majority of migrants go only a short distance and that migration proceeds stepwise as a sequence of localised population shifts towards the principal centres of commerce and industry. This paper tests these two laws in the 21st century context of counterurbanisation by reference to migration taking place within the Wider South East (WSE) of England, being the region dominated by deconcentration pressures emanating from London. It comprises two sets of empirical analyses using migration data for the period 2001-2016. Firstly, these data are aggregated to a set of broadly concentric rings around this core and analysed to reveal how much of the net outward shifts of population produced by this migration arises from net movement taking place between adjacent rings as a type of cascade as opposed to leapfrogging directly from the core into a non-adjacent ring. Cascading is found to predominate at this scale, confirming the continued importance of shorter-distance moving. Secondly, the migration data are rendered into a Travel to Work Area (TTWA) framework to examine the extent to which these subdivisions of the WSE perform a type of entrepôt role in helping to shift population outwards from London. Drawing on Ravenstein’s concepts of counties of “transfer” and “absorption”, two measures are developed for revealing how the net inflow to a particular TTWA from rings closer to the core compares numerically with the net outflow from that TTWA to the rings further away from it. The derived transfer and absorption rates are then used to classify the TTWAs into four groups according to whether their scores on each are above or below average. It is found that a TTWA’s role varies according to two main dimensions: the concentric zone to which it belongs and the radial sector out of London in which it is located, notably whether the sector has a coastal or landward border. * This article belongs to a special issue on “Internal Migration as a Driver of Regional Population Change in Europe: Updating Ravenstein”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更新Ravenstein:内部移民是英格兰东南部地区人口变化的驱动因素
拉文斯坦的“法律”来源于对19世纪中期不列颠群岛移民模式的广泛分析,其中的关键是,大多数移民只走很短的路,而且随着一系列本地化人口向主要的商业和工业中心转移,移民会逐步进行。本文在21世纪反城市化的背景下,通过参考英格兰大东南部(WSE)内发生的移民来检验这两条法律,该地区受到来自伦敦的分散压力的主导。它包括两组使用2001-2016年期间移民数据的实证分析。首先,将这些数据汇总到围绕该核心的一组大致同心的环中,并进行分析,以揭示这种迁移产生的人口净向外转移在多大程度上是由相邻环之间发生的净流动引起的,这是一种级联,而不是直接从核心跳到非相邻环中。级联在这个尺度上占主导地位,证实了短距离移动的持续重要性。其次,移民数据被提供到工作区旅行(TTWA)框架中,以检查WSE的这些细分部门在多大程度上发挥了一种中心作用,帮助人口从伦敦向外转移。根据Ravenstein关于“转移”和“吸收”县的概念,制定了两种衡量标准,以揭示从更靠近核心的环到特定TTWA的净流入与从该TTWA到离它更远的环的净流出在数字上的比较。然后,根据TTWAs的得分是高于还是低于平均水平,使用导出的转移率和吸收率将其分为四组。研究发现,TTWA的作用根据两个主要维度而变化:它所属的同心区和它所处的伦敦以外的辐射区,特别是该区是否有沿海或陆地边界。*这篇文章属于“内部移民作为欧洲区域人口变化的驱动因素:更新拉文斯坦”的特刊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Did smallpox cause stillbirths? Maternal smallpox infection, vaccination, and stillbirths in Sweden, 1780-1839. Social Resources are Associated With Higher Fertility Intentions in Contemporary Finland Healthy Lifespan Statistics Derived From Cross-Sectional Prevalence Data Using the Sullivan Method are Informative Summary Measures of Population Health A Quarter Century of Change in Family and Gender-Role Attitudes in Hungary Scarred for Life? Early-Life Experience of the Post-Reunification Economic Crisis in East Germany and Physical and Mental Health Outcomes in Early Adulthood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1