Navigating Traditional and Modern Institutions in City Governance: The Role of Chieftaincy in Spatial Planning in Tamale, Ghana

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES African Studies Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00020184.2021.1911623
I. Fuseini
{"title":"Navigating Traditional and Modern Institutions in City Governance: The Role of Chieftaincy in Spatial Planning in Tamale, Ghana","authors":"I. Fuseini","doi":"10.1080/00020184.2021.1911623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT At a time of intensifying urbanisation in Ghana, ineffective spatial planning is one of the symptomatic challenges of urban growth in the country. In the Ghanaian context, traditional authorities (chiefs) play a disproportionate role in urban land management due to the fact that a vast proportion of the country’s land is held in customary tenurial arrangements. The role of the traditional authorities in (urban) land management is given legal status by national constitutional provisions that recognise chiefs as fiduciaries of the land held under customary tenure. The state-supported customary land secretariats (CLSs) perform these responsibilities in conjunction with the local government structures. They are largely being operationalised through urban land-use planning. However, the complex factors and processes of rapid urban growth have had unintended consequences. These include increased urban land values, speculative and informal land markets, and overlapping governance/power structures. The outcome has been the reported commodification and administration of urban land by chiefs for personal gain. These complex processes evolve at the intersection of traditional and modern governance structures which are opportunistically interpreted and applied to achieve certain ends. This article demonstrates how these changes in customary land administration are evolving in Tamale, Ghana. Qualitative interviews were undertaken with participants from relevant statutory land sector institutions, local government officials and traditional authorities. Using the lens of urban governance and planning practices, the article explores the outcomes of chief-led spatial planning and customary land administration practices and associated land markets in Tamale. These are social, economic and spatial inequalities, as well as urban governance challenges.","PeriodicalId":51769,"journal":{"name":"African Studies","volume":"80 1","pages":"230 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00020184.2021.1911623","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2021.1911623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT At a time of intensifying urbanisation in Ghana, ineffective spatial planning is one of the symptomatic challenges of urban growth in the country. In the Ghanaian context, traditional authorities (chiefs) play a disproportionate role in urban land management due to the fact that a vast proportion of the country’s land is held in customary tenurial arrangements. The role of the traditional authorities in (urban) land management is given legal status by national constitutional provisions that recognise chiefs as fiduciaries of the land held under customary tenure. The state-supported customary land secretariats (CLSs) perform these responsibilities in conjunction with the local government structures. They are largely being operationalised through urban land-use planning. However, the complex factors and processes of rapid urban growth have had unintended consequences. These include increased urban land values, speculative and informal land markets, and overlapping governance/power structures. The outcome has been the reported commodification and administration of urban land by chiefs for personal gain. These complex processes evolve at the intersection of traditional and modern governance structures which are opportunistically interpreted and applied to achieve certain ends. This article demonstrates how these changes in customary land administration are evolving in Tamale, Ghana. Qualitative interviews were undertaken with participants from relevant statutory land sector institutions, local government officials and traditional authorities. Using the lens of urban governance and planning practices, the article explores the outcomes of chief-led spatial planning and customary land administration practices and associated land markets in Tamale. These are social, economic and spatial inequalities, as well as urban governance challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在城市治理中驾驭传统和现代制度:酋长在加纳塔马莱空间规划中的作用
摘要在加纳城市化进程加快之际,无效的空间规划是该国城市发展面临的症状性挑战之一。在加纳,传统当局(酋长)在城市土地管理中发挥着不成比例的作用,因为该国很大一部分土地是按照惯例的保有安排持有的。国家宪法规定,传统当局在(城市)土地管理中的作用具有法律地位,承认酋长是习惯保有权下持有的土地的受托人。国家支持的习惯土地秘书处(CLS)与地方政府机构一起履行这些职责。它们在很大程度上是通过城市土地利用规划来实施的。然而,城市快速增长的复杂因素和过程产生了意想不到的后果。其中包括城市土地价值的增加、投机和非正规土地市场以及重叠的治理/权力结构。据报道,其结果是酋长们为了个人利益而将城市土地商品化和管理。这些复杂的过程是在传统和现代治理结构的交叉点上发展起来的,这些治理结构被机会主义地解释和应用以实现某些目的。本文展示了加纳塔马莱传统土地管理的这些变化是如何演变的。对来自相关法定土地部门机构、地方政府官员和传统当局的参与者进行了定性访谈。本文从城市治理和规划实践的角度,探讨了首席领导的空间规划、传统土地管理实践和塔马勒相关土地市场的成果。这些是社会、经济和空间不平等,以及城市治理方面的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Studies
African Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sincere Intimacy, Genre and Heterotopology of a Confessional Public Communal Land and Belonging Among Foreign Former Farmworkers in Zimbabwe The High Court Ruling Against Ingonyama Trust: Implications for South Africa’s Land Governance Policy Neoliberal Leveraging of the Colonial Imagination: A Global South Reading of Tobacco Ads in Africa Entrenched Coloniality? Colonial-Born Black Women, Hair and Identity in Post-Apartheid South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1