{"title":"Does Social Work Ignore Socio-economic Class? An Exploratory Analysis of Selected Literature","authors":"C. Hyde","doi":"10.1080/10428232.2021.1926883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Social work espouses a commitment to social justice, including advocating on behalf of economically disenfranchised populations. This article explores the question of whether this commitment is reflected in selected leading social work journals. A keyword search in Social Work abstracts, a content analysis of three core social work journals, and a secondary thematic analysis of articles in those journals were conducted. The keyword analysis focused on a comparison of class and non-class related article keywords in refereed articles (N = 17,725) from 2006–2015. The content analysis examined 713 referred articles that addressed class-specific content between 2011–2015 from Journal of Social Work Education, Social Work, and Research on Social Work Practice. These same articles were subject to a secondary thematic analysis. Keyword findings indicate that non-class content receives substantially more attention than class-specific content does. Among content that is class-specific, the focus is overwhelmingly on “professional” status. Other aspects of class identity, context, or practice interventions are minimally covered. Based on this study, it appears that at least three of the discipline’s leading journals neglect socio-economic class content to the detriment of practitioners, students, clients and constituents.","PeriodicalId":44255,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10428232.2021.1926883","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2021.1926883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Social work espouses a commitment to social justice, including advocating on behalf of economically disenfranchised populations. This article explores the question of whether this commitment is reflected in selected leading social work journals. A keyword search in Social Work abstracts, a content analysis of three core social work journals, and a secondary thematic analysis of articles in those journals were conducted. The keyword analysis focused on a comparison of class and non-class related article keywords in refereed articles (N = 17,725) from 2006–2015. The content analysis examined 713 referred articles that addressed class-specific content between 2011–2015 from Journal of Social Work Education, Social Work, and Research on Social Work Practice. These same articles were subject to a secondary thematic analysis. Keyword findings indicate that non-class content receives substantially more attention than class-specific content does. Among content that is class-specific, the focus is overwhelmingly on “professional” status. Other aspects of class identity, context, or practice interventions are minimally covered. Based on this study, it appears that at least three of the discipline’s leading journals neglect socio-economic class content to the detriment of practitioners, students, clients and constituents.
期刊介绍:
The only journal of its kind in the United States, the Journal of Progressive Human Services covers political, social, personal, and professional problems in human services from a progressive perspective. The journal stimulates debate about major social issues and contributes to the development of the analytical tools needed for building a caring society based on equality and justice. The journal"s contributors examine oppressed and vulnerable groups, struggles by workers and clients on the job and in the community, dilemmas of practice in conservative contexts, and strategies for ending racism, sexism, ageism, heterosexism, and discrimination of persons who are disabled and psychologically distressed.