A MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK FOR PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION: ADVANCING THE OSLO MANUAL FOR PUBLIC SECTOR

Sebastian Singler
{"title":"A MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK FOR PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION: ADVANCING THE OSLO MANUAL FOR PUBLIC SECTOR","authors":"Sebastian Singler","doi":"10.1142/s1363919623500056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public sector innovation has become a ubiquitous theme in legislature plans and political debates. Subsequently, academia has become increasingly interested in the topic, and research on public sector innovation has grown in recent decades. Yet, research lacks a clearly conceptualised definition of public sector innovation, and a measurement framework that allows for more representative research and a comparison of results both within the public sector and with other sectors. Based on semi-structured interviews and workshops with public sector practitioners complemented by existing literature on public sector innovation, we have refined the Oslo Manual’s measurement framework that originally addresses innovation in the business sector to capture public-sector-specific requirements. The refined measurement framework gives a comprehensive and comparable set of data that researchers might collect and analyse to understand public sector innovation, and to develop and test theories. Thus, it provides a common base for future representative research.","PeriodicalId":47711,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919623500056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public sector innovation has become a ubiquitous theme in legislature plans and political debates. Subsequently, academia has become increasingly interested in the topic, and research on public sector innovation has grown in recent decades. Yet, research lacks a clearly conceptualised definition of public sector innovation, and a measurement framework that allows for more representative research and a comparison of results both within the public sector and with other sectors. Based on semi-structured interviews and workshops with public sector practitioners complemented by existing literature on public sector innovation, we have refined the Oslo Manual’s measurement framework that originally addresses innovation in the business sector to capture public-sector-specific requirements. The refined measurement framework gives a comprehensive and comparable set of data that researchers might collect and analyse to understand public sector innovation, and to develop and test theories. Thus, it provides a common base for future representative research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共部门创新的度量框架&OSLO公共部门手册的推进
公共部门的创新已经成为立法计划和政治辩论中无处不在的主题。随后,学术界对这一话题越来越感兴趣,近几十年来,对公共部门创新的研究也越来越多。然而,研究缺乏对公共部门创新的明确概念化定义,也缺乏一个衡量框架,允许进行更具代表性的研究,并对公共部门内部和与其他部门的结果进行比较。基于与公共部门从业者的半结构化访谈和研讨会,并辅以现有的公共部门创新文献,我们改进了《奥斯陆手册》的衡量框架,该框架最初针对商业部门的创新,以捕捉公共部门的特定需求。完善的测量框架提供了一套全面和可比较的数据,研究人员可以收集和分析这些数据,以了解公共部门的创新,并开发和测试理论。从而为今后的代表性研究提供了共同的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Innovation (IJIM) is the official journal of the International Society of Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM). Both the IJIM and ISPIM adopt a multi-disciplinary approach to addressing the many challenges of managing innovation, rather than a narrow focus on a single aspect such as technology, R&D or new product development. Both are also international, inclusive & practical, and encourage active interaction between academics, managers and consultants.
期刊最新文献
CULTURAL TENSIONS AND VALUES-ACTION GAPS IN SUSTAINABILITY-ORIENTED INNOVATION: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC INQUIRY BIG DATA GOVERNANCE AND INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF BIG DATA ANALYTIC CAPABILITIES AND ORGANISATIONAL AGILITY MOTIVATING FOR INNOVATING: EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN REGULATORY FOCUS AND WORKPLACE INNOVATION HUMAN JUDGMENT IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR BUSINESS DECISION-MAKING: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY REPUTATION AND TRUST OF PRINCIPALS AND AGENTS IN INTERORGANISATIONAL RELATIONS — THE CASE OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH COOPERATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1