A qualitative research on co-creating care pathways for Sarcoma and GIST by stimulating reflection

V. Petit-Steeghs, T. Schuitmaker-Warnaar, Ciska A Pruijssers, Gerard van Oortmerssen, J. Broerse
{"title":"A qualitative research on co-creating care pathways for Sarcoma and GIST by stimulating reflection","authors":"V. Petit-Steeghs, T. Schuitmaker-Warnaar, Ciska A Pruijssers, Gerard van Oortmerssen, J. Broerse","doi":"10.1177/2053434520907743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Care Pathway Management intends to enhance the quality of care by restructuring care services. As recipients of care, patients have relevant experiential knowledge on the provision of care, but they are rarely involved in Care Pathway Management due to various barriers. This study aims to acquire insights into how patients can be meaningfully involved in Care Pathway Management. Methods A case study was conducted to assess the implementation of patient involvement in the co-creation of the care pathways of Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (the Netherlands), using the Interactive Learning and Action methodology. Within the pathways, seven patients and eight health professionals were involved. To overcome expected and encountered barriers to involving patients, reflection was stimulated on the care pathways and the development process. Qualitative data were collected via interviews, participatory observations and informal conversations. For analysis, a patient involvement evaluation framework and criteria for knowledge co-creation were used. Results Patients indicated specific improvements for current pathways regarding communication, the assistance of a nurse and integrated care. However, the co-creation process encountered several barriers, including limited opportunities to overcome patients’ knowledge gap on medical care services, limited time and uncertainties about responsibilities. Moreover, participatory reflection to enhance the co-creation process was constrained by power imbalances between patients and health professionals and health professionals’ restricted perceptions of their role. Discussion To enhance the meaningful involvement of patients in Care Pathway Management, constraints in joint reflection on the co-creation process must be overcome.","PeriodicalId":43751,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Coordination","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2053434520907743","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2053434520907743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction Care Pathway Management intends to enhance the quality of care by restructuring care services. As recipients of care, patients have relevant experiential knowledge on the provision of care, but they are rarely involved in Care Pathway Management due to various barriers. This study aims to acquire insights into how patients can be meaningfully involved in Care Pathway Management. Methods A case study was conducted to assess the implementation of patient involvement in the co-creation of the care pathways of Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (the Netherlands), using the Interactive Learning and Action methodology. Within the pathways, seven patients and eight health professionals were involved. To overcome expected and encountered barriers to involving patients, reflection was stimulated on the care pathways and the development process. Qualitative data were collected via interviews, participatory observations and informal conversations. For analysis, a patient involvement evaluation framework and criteria for knowledge co-creation were used. Results Patients indicated specific improvements for current pathways regarding communication, the assistance of a nurse and integrated care. However, the co-creation process encountered several barriers, including limited opportunities to overcome patients’ knowledge gap on medical care services, limited time and uncertainties about responsibilities. Moreover, participatory reflection to enhance the co-creation process was constrained by power imbalances between patients and health professionals and health professionals’ restricted perceptions of their role. Discussion To enhance the meaningful involvement of patients in Care Pathway Management, constraints in joint reflection on the co-creation process must be overcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刺激反思共创肉瘤与GIST护理通路的定性研究
护理路径管理旨在通过重组护理服务来提高护理质量。作为护理的接受者,患者对护理的提供有相关的经验知识,但由于各种障碍,他们很少参与护理路径管理。本研究旨在了解患者如何能够有意义地参与护理路径管理。方法采用交互式学习和行动方法,对荷兰伊拉斯谟MC癌症研究所(Erasmus MC Cancer Institute)患者参与共同创建软组织肉瘤和胃肠道间质瘤护理途径的实施情况进行了案例研究。在这些途径中,有7名病人和8名保健专业人员参与。为了克服预期和遇到的障碍,使患者参与进来,对护理途径和发展过程进行了反思。定性数据通过访谈、参与性观察和非正式谈话收集。为了进行分析,使用了患者参与评估框架和知识共同创造的标准。结果患者在沟通、护士协助和综合护理方面有明显改善。然而,共同创造过程遇到了一些障碍,包括克服患者在医疗保健服务方面的知识差距的机会有限、时间有限以及责任不确定。此外,促进共同创造过程的参与性反思受到患者和卫生专业人员之间权力不平衡以及卫生专业人员对其角色的有限认识的制约。为了加强患者对护理路径管理的有意义的参与,必须克服共同创造过程中共同反思的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Care Coordination (formerly published as the International Journal of Care Pathways) provides an international forum for the latest scientific research in care coordination. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles which describe basic research to a multidisciplinary field as well as other broader approaches and strategies hypothesized to improve care coordination. The Journal offers insightful overviews and reflections on innovation, underlying issues, and thought provoking opinion pieces in related fields. Articles from multidisciplinary fields are welcomed from leading health care academics and policy-makers. Published articles types include original research, reviews, guidelines papers, book reviews, and news items.
期刊最新文献
Primary care follow-up among children born with neonatal abstinence syndrome in a rural region in the United States Effectiveness of early care information transfer among home-dwelling frail elderly patients in Japan: A cluster randomized trial Nurses’ roles, views and knowledge regarding vaccines and vaccination: A pan-European survey Without unpaid carers the system would collapse Supporting rural health services through regional networks: Observations of a formalized model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1