“And yet it moves!” An institutional analysis of the Immobili’s motion towards hybridity

IF 0.9 Q4 MANAGEMENT Journal of Management History Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1108/jmh-07-2022-0024
M. Giorgino
{"title":"“And yet it moves!” An institutional analysis of the Immobili’s motion towards hybridity","authors":"M. Giorgino","doi":"10.1108/jmh-07-2022-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to inform the discussion on why and how non-profit organizations can experience a hybridization process to address the criticism that would assume hybridity as an intrinsic characteristic of all organizations. Specifically, by referring to the academies of intellectuals as the non-profit setting in which investigating the emergence of hybridity takes place, this paper aims at exploring, first, to what extent this emergence could be induced by institutional conditions, and, second, which structural innovations could sustain the academies’ “motion” towards hybridity.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper relies on the institutional logics perspective and adopts the case study method applied to a historical context. The case under analysis is the Academy of “the Immobili”, which, in spite of its name, experienced a hybridization process in 1720 because of the decision to involve an impresario in the management of its theatre.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings highlight the significant role played by institutional conditions in inducing the emergence of hybridity, even in presence of internal resistance to any “motion” from the non-profit setting. Moreover, the analysis of the innovations associated with this emergence detects the intertwined action of the different decision makers involved in the hybridization process, in spite of their formal separation. These findings strengthen the conceptualization of hybridity within non-profit organizations.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBesides referring to a historical period that is still little explored in terms of hybridity within organizations, the paper focuses on an original context, i.e. academies, representing an ancient typology of cultural organizations. Therefore, the paper also provides the first insights into the hybridization process of cultural organizations from a historical perspective.\n","PeriodicalId":45819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-07-2022-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to inform the discussion on why and how non-profit organizations can experience a hybridization process to address the criticism that would assume hybridity as an intrinsic characteristic of all organizations. Specifically, by referring to the academies of intellectuals as the non-profit setting in which investigating the emergence of hybridity takes place, this paper aims at exploring, first, to what extent this emergence could be induced by institutional conditions, and, second, which structural innovations could sustain the academies’ “motion” towards hybridity. Design/methodology/approach This paper relies on the institutional logics perspective and adopts the case study method applied to a historical context. The case under analysis is the Academy of “the Immobili”, which, in spite of its name, experienced a hybridization process in 1720 because of the decision to involve an impresario in the management of its theatre. Findings The findings highlight the significant role played by institutional conditions in inducing the emergence of hybridity, even in presence of internal resistance to any “motion” from the non-profit setting. Moreover, the analysis of the innovations associated with this emergence detects the intertwined action of the different decision makers involved in the hybridization process, in spite of their formal separation. These findings strengthen the conceptualization of hybridity within non-profit organizations. Originality/value Besides referring to a historical period that is still little explored in terms of hybridity within organizations, the paper focuses on an original context, i.e. academies, representing an ancient typology of cultural organizations. Therefore, the paper also provides the first insights into the hybridization process of cultural organizations from a historical perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“可是它还在动!”“不动者”走向混杂的制度分析
目的本文旨在探讨非营利组织为什么以及如何经历杂交过程,以解决将杂交性视为所有组织固有特征的批评。具体而言,本文将知识分子学院称为调查混合性出现的非营利环境,旨在探索,首先,这种出现在多大程度上是由制度条件引起的,其次,哪些结构创新可以维持学院向混合性的“运动”。设计/方法论/途径本文以制度逻辑为视角,采用个案研究的方法,将其应用于历史语境中。正在分析的案例是“Immobili”学院,尽管其名称如此,但由于决定让一名经理人参与其剧院的管理,该学院在1720年经历了一个混合过程。发现这些发现强调了制度条件在诱导混合性出现方面发挥的重要作用,即使在对非营利环境中的任何“运动”存在内部阻力的情况下也是如此。此外,对与这种出现相关的创新的分析发现了参与杂交过程的不同决策者的相互交织的行为,尽管他们在形式上是分离的。这些发现强化了非营利组织内部混合性的概念。原创性/价值除了提到一个在组织内部的混合性方面仍然很少被探索的历史时期外,本文还关注一个原始的背景,即学院,代表着一种古老的文化组织类型。因此,本文也从历史的角度对文化组织的杂交过程提供了第一次见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the intellectual nexus between Peirce’s synechism and Goldratt’s theory of constraints: insights for management and organization studies Back to roots! The singular introduction of statutory auditing in France, Germany and Great Britain (1844–1935) Rooting firm responsibility in social-ecological systems through ancient Nahua thought: rethinking the logic model in the global reporting initiative The troubled establishment of the Tourist Hotel Corporation of New Zealand Boundary spanning activities and resource orchestration as microfoundations of dynamic capability: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1