下载PDF
{"title":"Editor's Introduction: New Religious Movements: Cosmic Buddhism in Kalmykia and Ak-Jang in Altai","authors":"M. Balzer","doi":"10.1080/10611959.2018.1484011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human groups are notoriously fractioning, particularly religions in times of trouble. New religious movements have been widely studied as a wellknown social phenomenon, with some scholars arguing that Christianity and Buddhism are themselves variations on new religious movements established by charismatic and self-sacrificing leaders. Japanese scholars consider some spiritual revitalization movements to be spinoffs of relatively recent others, to the point where they discuss “new, new religious movements.” It is logical that the spiritual experimentation and political-economic instability of the post-Soviet period have provided substantial contexts for local variations on new religious movements in various parts of Eurasia. Fearful or conservative outsiders often derogatorily name such movements “sects” or “cults.” However, they manifest a range of group “insider” dynamics and a potential feast for open-minded searchers for processes behind cultural change. Focus in this issue is on two movements in traditionally Buddhist regions within the Russian Federation: the republics of Kalmykia and Altai. The kernel of this project began with a delightful, unsolicited email from Valeria Gazizova, a talented Tatar–Russian woman with a doctorate in anthropology from the University of Oslo. She has been working since 2011 with a group of nativist Kalmyk proselytizers of a religious movement that advocates returning to Kalmyk roots, specifically Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, vol. 57, no. 1, 2018, pp. 1–4. © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1061-1959 (print)/ISSN 1558-092X (online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2018.1484011","PeriodicalId":35495,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611959.2018.1484011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2018.1484011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
编者简介:新宗教运动:卡尔梅克的宇宙佛教和阿尔泰的Ak-Jang
人类群体是出了名的脾气暴躁,尤其是在困难时期的宗教。新宗教运动作为一种众所周知的社会现象被广泛研究,一些学者认为,基督教和佛教本身就是魅力超凡、自我牺牲的领导人建立的新宗教运动的变体。日本学者认为,一些精神复兴运动是相对较新的其他运动的衍生,以至于他们讨论“新的、新的宗教运动”。“合乎逻辑的是,后苏联时期的精神实验和政治经济不稳定为欧亚大陆各地新宗教运动的地方变化提供了实质性的背景。恐惧或保守的局外人经常贬义地将此类运动称为“教派”或“邪教”。然而,它们表现出一系列群体“内部”动态,并可能为那些对文化变革背后的过程持开放态度的探索者带来盛宴。这个问题的焦点是俄罗斯联邦内传统佛教地区的两个运动:卡尔梅基亚共和国和阿尔泰共和国。这个项目的核心始于瓦莱丽娅·加齐佐娃(Valeria Gazizova)的一封令人愉快的、不请自来的电子邮件,她是一位才华横溢的鞑靼-俄罗斯女性,拥有奥斯陆大学人类学博士学位。自2011年以来,她一直与一个宗教运动的本土主义卡尔梅克传教士团体合作,该运动主张回归卡尔梅克根源,特别是《欧亚人类学与考古学》,第57卷,2018年第1期,第1-4页。©2018 Taylor&Francis Group,LLC ISSN:1061-1959(印刷版)/ISN 1558-092X(在线版)DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2018.1484011
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。