Transitioning from child to adult mental health services: what role for social services? Insights from a European survey

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Childrens Services Pub Date : 2020-09-17 DOI:10.1108/JCS-05-2020-0014
G. Signorini, N. Davidović, G. Dieleman, T. Franić, J. Madan, A. Maras, Fiona Mc Nicholas, L. O'Hara, M. Paul, D. Purper-Ouakil, P. Santosh, U. Schulze, S. Singh, C. Street, S. Tremmery, H. Tuomainen, F. Verhulst, J. Warwick, D. Wolke, G. Girolamo
{"title":"Transitioning from child to adult mental health services: what role for social services? Insights from a European survey","authors":"G. Signorini, N. Davidović, G. Dieleman, T. Franić, J. Madan, A. Maras, Fiona Mc Nicholas, L. O'Hara, M. Paul, D. Purper-Ouakil, P. Santosh, U. Schulze, S. Singh, C. Street, S. Tremmery, H. Tuomainen, F. Verhulst, J. Warwick, D. Wolke, G. Girolamo","doi":"10.1108/JCS-05-2020-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nYoung people transitioning from child to adult mental health services are frequently also known to social services, but the role of such services in this study and their interplay with mental healthcare system lacks evidence in the European panorama. This study aims to gather information on the characteristics and the involvement of social services supporting young people approaching transition.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA survey of 16 European Union countries was conducted. Country respondents, representing social services’ point of view, completed an ad hoc questionnaire. Information sought included details on social service availability and the characteristics of their interplay with mental health services.\n\n\nFindings\nService availability ranges from a low of 3/100,000 social workers working with young people of transition age in Spain to a high 500/100,000 social workers in Poland, with heterogeneous involvement in youth health care. Community-based residential facilities and services for youth under custodial measures were the most commonly type of social service involved. In 80% of the surveyed countries, youth protection from abuse/neglect is overall regulated by national protocols or written agreements between mental health and social services, with the exception of Czech Republic and Greece, where poor or no protocols apply. Lack of connection between child and adult mental health services has been identified as the major obstacles to transition (93.8%), together with insufficient involvement of stakeholders throughout the process.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nMarked heterogeneity across countries may suggest weaknesses in youth mental health policy-making at the European level. Greater inclusion of relevant stakeholders is needed to inform the development and implementation of person-centered health-care models. Disconnection between child and adult mental health services is widely recognized in the social services arena as the major barrier faced by young service users in transition; this “outside” perspective provides further support for an urgent re-configuration of services and the need to address unaligned working practices and service cultures.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is the first survey gathering information on social service provision at the time of mental health services transition at a European level; its findings may help to inform services to offer a better coordinated social health care for young people with mental health disorders.\n","PeriodicalId":45244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Childrens Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JCS-05-2020-0014","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Childrens Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-05-2020-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose Young people transitioning from child to adult mental health services are frequently also known to social services, but the role of such services in this study and their interplay with mental healthcare system lacks evidence in the European panorama. This study aims to gather information on the characteristics and the involvement of social services supporting young people approaching transition. Design/methodology/approach A survey of 16 European Union countries was conducted. Country respondents, representing social services’ point of view, completed an ad hoc questionnaire. Information sought included details on social service availability and the characteristics of their interplay with mental health services. Findings Service availability ranges from a low of 3/100,000 social workers working with young people of transition age in Spain to a high 500/100,000 social workers in Poland, with heterogeneous involvement in youth health care. Community-based residential facilities and services for youth under custodial measures were the most commonly type of social service involved. In 80% of the surveyed countries, youth protection from abuse/neglect is overall regulated by national protocols or written agreements between mental health and social services, with the exception of Czech Republic and Greece, where poor or no protocols apply. Lack of connection between child and adult mental health services has been identified as the major obstacles to transition (93.8%), together with insufficient involvement of stakeholders throughout the process. Research limitations/implications Marked heterogeneity across countries may suggest weaknesses in youth mental health policy-making at the European level. Greater inclusion of relevant stakeholders is needed to inform the development and implementation of person-centered health-care models. Disconnection between child and adult mental health services is widely recognized in the social services arena as the major barrier faced by young service users in transition; this “outside” perspective provides further support for an urgent re-configuration of services and the need to address unaligned working practices and service cultures. Originality/value This is the first survey gathering information on social service provision at the time of mental health services transition at a European level; its findings may help to inform services to offer a better coordinated social health care for young people with mental health disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从儿童心理健康服务向成人心理健康服务过渡:社会服务的作用是什么?来自欧洲调查的见解
目的年轻人从儿童过渡到成人心理健康服务往往也知道社会服务,但这种服务在本研究中的作用及其与精神卫生保健系统的相互作用缺乏证据在欧洲全景。本研究旨在收集关于支持即将过渡的青年人的社会服务的特点和参与的资料。设计/方法/方法对16个欧洲联盟国家进行了调查。代表社会服务机构观点的答复国填写了一份特设调查表。所寻求的资料包括提供社会服务的详细情况及其与精神卫生服务相互作用的特点。研究发现,服务的可用性范围从西班牙的低至10万分之三的过渡年龄青年社会工作者到波兰的高至500/10万的社会工作者,参与青年保健的情况各不相同。以社区为基础的住宅设施和为被拘留的青年提供的服务是所涉及的最常见的社会服务类型。在80%的被调查国家中,保护青少年免受虐待/忽视总体上是由国家议定书或精神卫生和社会服务部门之间的书面协议来规定的,但捷克共和国和希腊除外,这两个国家适用的议定书很少或根本没有。儿童和成人心理健康服务之间缺乏联系已被确定为过渡的主要障碍(93.8%),以及整个过程中利益攸关方的参与不足。研究局限性/意义各国之间明显的异质性可能表明欧洲一级青年心理健康政策制定的弱点。需要更多地纳入相关利益攸关方,以便为制定和实施以人为本的保健模式提供信息。在社会服务领域,儿童和成人心理健康服务之间的脱节被广泛认为是转型期青年服务使用者面临的主要障碍;这种“外部”视角为服务的紧急重新配置以及解决不一致的工作实践和服务文化的需求提供了进一步的支持。独创性/价值这是第一次在欧洲一级收集关于精神卫生服务过渡时期社会服务提供情况的调查;其研究结果可能有助于为服务部门提供更好的协调社会卫生保健,为患有精神健康障碍的年轻人提供服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
“Friendly, local and welcoming” – evaluation of a community mental health early intervention service From “intimate-insider” to “relative-outsider”: an autoethnographic account of undertaking social work research in one’s own “backyard” Effective child well-being practices, barriers and priority actions: survey findings from service providers and policymakers in 22 countries during COVID-19 Child First and the end of ‘bifurcation’ in youth justice? Why are there higher rates of children looked after in Wales?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1