A study of the therapeutic effects of progesterone in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.3 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Trauma Research Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.4103/atr.atr_106_19
Rezvan Bazgir, A. Siahposht-Khachaki, E. Akbari, D. Farzin
{"title":"A study of the therapeutic effects of progesterone in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Rezvan Bazgir, A. Siahposht-Khachaki, E. Akbari, D. Farzin","doi":"10.4103/atr.atr_106_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the main causes of death and disability in affected people. Progesterone, an endogenous steroid hormone, is known to have a function in the central nervous system. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effects of progesterone in patients with severe TBIs through systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines for systematic reviews. A systematic search was conducted at PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus. The keywords, including “progesterone,” “progestin,” “traumatic brain damage,” “TBI,” “head injury,” and “stroke” were searched. There was no time or language limit . Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) study type: randomized controlled trial; (b) participants: patients with acute TBI; (c) intervention: progesterone; and (d) outcomes: favorable outcome based on mortality rate. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) study types: case reports, case reviews, retrospective study, and cohort studies and (b) control: positive control. The data were then collected and analyzed using randomized pooled analysis of risk ratio (RR) for mortality. Results: In the study, 721 articles were selected. Finally, 11 studies were analyzed and entered into meta-analysis. All studies are classified as high quality (with a score of more than 7) and therefore no studies were evaluated based on quality assessment. The result of the fixed pooled analysis of RR for mortality was 0.95 with a P value of 0.495. Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that progesterone does not decrease the mortality rate despite the various data, suggesting the positive effects of progesterone on the treatment of TBIs.","PeriodicalId":45486,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Trauma Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Trauma Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atr.atr_106_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the main causes of death and disability in affected people. Progesterone, an endogenous steroid hormone, is known to have a function in the central nervous system. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effects of progesterone in patients with severe TBIs through systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines for systematic reviews. A systematic search was conducted at PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus. The keywords, including “progesterone,” “progestin,” “traumatic brain damage,” “TBI,” “head injury,” and “stroke” were searched. There was no time or language limit . Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) study type: randomized controlled trial; (b) participants: patients with acute TBI; (c) intervention: progesterone; and (d) outcomes: favorable outcome based on mortality rate. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) study types: case reports, case reviews, retrospective study, and cohort studies and (b) control: positive control. The data were then collected and analyzed using randomized pooled analysis of risk ratio (RR) for mortality. Results: In the study, 721 articles were selected. Finally, 11 studies were analyzed and entered into meta-analysis. All studies are classified as high quality (with a score of more than 7) and therefore no studies were evaluated based on quality assessment. The result of the fixed pooled analysis of RR for mortality was 0.95 with a P value of 0.495. Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that progesterone does not decrease the mortality rate despite the various data, suggesting the positive effects of progesterone on the treatment of TBIs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黄体酮治疗创伤性脑损伤疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析
背景与目的:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是影响患者死亡和致残的主要原因之一。黄体酮是一种内源性类固醇激素,已知在中枢神经系统中具有功能。本研究的目的是通过随机临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析,研究黄体酮对严重TBIs患者的治疗效果。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析基于系统综述的首选报告项目和系统综述的荟萃分析指南进行。在PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Scopus上进行了系统搜索。搜索关键词,包括“黄体酮”、“孕激素”、“创伤性脑损伤”、“TBI”、“头部损伤”和“中风”。没有时间或语言限制。纳入标准如下:(a)研究类型:随机对照试验;(b) 参与者:急性TBI患者;(c) 干预:黄体酮;(d)结果:基于死亡率的有利结果。排除标准如下:(a)研究类型:病例报告、病例回顾、回顾性研究和队列研究;(b)对照:阳性对照。然后收集数据,并使用死亡率风险比(RR)的随机汇总分析进行分析。结果:本研究共选取721篇文章。最后,对11项研究进行了分析并进入荟萃分析。所有研究都被归类为高质量(得分超过7分),因此没有基于质量评估对研究进行评估。死亡率RR的固定汇总分析结果为0.95,P值为0.495。结论:尽管有各种数据,但本研究的结果表明,黄体酮并没有降低死亡率,这表明黄体酮对TBIs的治疗具有积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in all fields related to trauma or injury. Archives of Trauma Research is an authentic clinical journal, which is devoted to the particular compilation of the latest worldwide and interdisciplinary approach and findings, including original manuscripts, meta-analyses and reviews, health economic papers, debates, and consensus statements of clinical relevant to the trauma and injury field. Readers are generally specialists in the fields of general surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, or any other related fields of basic and clinical sciences..
期刊最新文献
An epidemiologic study of traumatic brain injury in children, middle-aged patients, and elderly presenting to the emergency department Nonoperative treatment of talonavicular joint dislocation associated with jones fracture Risk assessment of reheating furnace by failure modes and effect analysis method in steel complexes A nonsurgical trauma causing bilateral adductor palsy of the vocal folds following total thyroidectomy Forearm longitudinal discrepancy after forearm fractures' fixation in pediatric: A case series study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1