The Image of Muhammad in Riccoldo da Monte di Croce’s "Contra legem Sarracenorum"

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Studia Ceranea Pub Date : 2019-12-30 DOI:10.18778/2084-140x.09.21
Maciej Dawczyk
{"title":"The Image of Muhammad in Riccoldo da Monte di Croce’s \"Contra legem Sarracenorum\"","authors":"Maciej Dawczyk","doi":"10.18778/2084-140x.09.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contra legem Sarracenorum written by the Dominican Riccoldo da Monte di Croce was considered one of the most influential medieval Christian anti-Islamic polemics. The treatise was devoted to criticism of the Quran, which was also reflected in the way Muhammad was presented there. It offers an image of the prophet that is rather blurry considering that the author’s focus is on the contents and the form of the book. Despite that, at least three distinct categories regarding the image of Muhammad can be distinguished in Contra legem Sarracenorum. He was portrayed, first and foremost, as a heresiarch, as a false prophet (most of the information about the prophet included in this work is used to support that view), and simply as an evil man. The image of Muhammad outlined by Riccoldo is largely dependent on the contents of the Mozarabic polemic treatise Liber denudationis, which the author used profusely. Muhammad is present in Contra legem Sarracenorum mainly in an indirect way as the creator of the teachings contained in the Quran. Generally speaking, in this specific aspect, one cannot speak of constructing an image of the prophet because in these fragments, the polemic conducted by Riccodlo focuses not so much on the person of Muhammad as on the contents of the book ascribed to him, in isolation from the creator.","PeriodicalId":40873,"journal":{"name":"Studia Ceranea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Ceranea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140x.09.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Contra legem Sarracenorum written by the Dominican Riccoldo da Monte di Croce was considered one of the most influential medieval Christian anti-Islamic polemics. The treatise was devoted to criticism of the Quran, which was also reflected in the way Muhammad was presented there. It offers an image of the prophet that is rather blurry considering that the author’s focus is on the contents and the form of the book. Despite that, at least three distinct categories regarding the image of Muhammad can be distinguished in Contra legem Sarracenorum. He was portrayed, first and foremost, as a heresiarch, as a false prophet (most of the information about the prophet included in this work is used to support that view), and simply as an evil man. The image of Muhammad outlined by Riccoldo is largely dependent on the contents of the Mozarabic polemic treatise Liber denudationis, which the author used profusely. Muhammad is present in Contra legem Sarracenorum mainly in an indirect way as the creator of the teachings contained in the Quran. Generally speaking, in this specific aspect, one cannot speak of constructing an image of the prophet because in these fragments, the polemic conducted by Riccodlo focuses not so much on the person of Muhammad as on the contents of the book ascribed to him, in isolation from the creator.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Riccoldo da Monte di Croce的《Sarracenorum的反法》中的穆罕默德形象
多明尼加的Riccoldo da Monte di Croce所写的《反宗教法》被认为是中世纪最具影响力的基督教反伊斯兰论战之一。这篇论文专门批评《古兰经》,穆罕默德在那里的表现也反映了这一点。考虑到作者的重点是书的内容和形式,它提供了一个相当模糊的先知形象。尽管如此,关于穆罕默德的形象,至少有三个不同的类别可以在Sarracenorum法中区分出来。首先,他被描绘成一个异端,一个虚假的先知(这部作品中包含的关于先知的大部分信息都被用来支持这一观点),而仅仅是一个邪恶的人。Riccoldo描绘的穆罕默德形象在很大程度上取决于作者大量使用的莫兹阿拉伯论战论文《自由的剥蚀》的内容。穆罕默德主要以间接的方式出现在《古兰经》中,他是古兰经教义的创造者。一般来说,在这个特定的方面,人们不能谈论构建先知的形象,因为在这些片段中,Riccodlo进行的论战与其说是关注穆罕默德的个人,不如说是关注书中赋予他的内容,与创作者隔绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Ceranea
Studia Ceranea HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Hymnography in Honour of Saints Constantine and Helena and its Connection with Imperial Ideology The Jewish Theme in Theophanes the Confessor’s Testimony on the Prophet Muḥammad Justinian, Pilgrimages and the Theotokos: Imperial Propaganda in De Aedificiis V Basil I’s Path to Power according to the Vita Basilii as a Heroic Myth Representing the Phlegm: the Portrait of the Phlegmatic in Cesare Ripa’s Iconology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1