Role of Zinc on Drought Tolerance in Some Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars under Reduced Soil Water

IF 0.5 Q4 AGRONOMY Egyptian Journal of Agronomy Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.21608/agro.2022.105221.1291
R. Mahdy, K. Farghali
{"title":"Role of Zinc on Drought Tolerance in Some Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars under Reduced Soil Water","authors":"R. Mahdy, K. Farghali","doi":"10.21608/agro.2022.105221.1291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Received 09/11/2021; Accepted 10/1/2022 DOI : 10.21608/agro.2022.105221.1291 ©2021 National Information and Documentation Center (NIDOC) involved in many biochemical pathways (Alloway, 2009; Cakmak et al., 2017). The presence of some micronutrients needed for plant growth may alleviate the effect of dehydration. Interestingly Zn, B, and Mn applications raise the resistance of plants to drought stress (Khan et al., 2004; Movahhedy-Dehnavy et al., 2009). Otherwise, drought stress has exerted a negative effect on relative water content of leaves (RWC), and durum wheat under water stress loses much more water than the bread wheat. Larbi et al. (2004), Akram (2011) and Keyvan (2010) indicated that increase in the intensity of drought stress decreased RWC, total chlorophyll and increased proline content. Also, Tale & Haddad (2011) stated that drought stress closes stomata, inhibits photosynthesis and damages the chlorophyll contents. Furthermore, Almeselmani et al. (2012) recorded reduction in all physiological traits, yield and yield component in D is a serious abiotic stress affects crop production in Egypt and worldwide. Two experiments were carried out under drought stress and normal irrigation during the seasons of 2018/19 and 2019/20 to study the effect of foliar application of Zn to alleviate drought stress. The soil texture is clay. The genetic materials were three Egyptian cultivars; Sakha 69, Giza 68 and Gemmieza 11. The levels of foliar spray of zinc oxide were 500ppm, 250 ppm, water and control (no treatment), sprayed two weeks before and at anthesis. Mean squares of the combined data was significant (P≤ 0.01) for Zn levels and for yield traits except for spike length. The differences among cultivars were significant (P≤ 0.01) except for yield under irrigation. This confirms the concept of “selection for yield under stress is better than under favorable environment”. The traits plant height (PH), number of spikes/plant (NS/P), biological yield/plant (BY/P), grain yield/plant (GY/P) and 100GW showed the best performance at the higher Zn level 500ppm. Water deficit exerted negative effects on RWC% and chlorophyll. The reduction % (the difference between irrigation and drought stress relative to irrigation performance) in all traits was the lowest at 500ppm of Zn and increased ascendingly by decreasing the Zn level. Sakha 69 significantly showed the best performance for PH, NS/P and BY/P under both, drought stress and normal irrigation. It could be concluded that Zn foliar application alleviated drought stress, and Sakha 69 was the most stable cultivar in GY/P and gave the best performance under drought stress.","PeriodicalId":42226,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Agronomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/agro.2022.105221.1291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Received 09/11/2021; Accepted 10/1/2022 DOI : 10.21608/agro.2022.105221.1291 ©2021 National Information and Documentation Center (NIDOC) involved in many biochemical pathways (Alloway, 2009; Cakmak et al., 2017). The presence of some micronutrients needed for plant growth may alleviate the effect of dehydration. Interestingly Zn, B, and Mn applications raise the resistance of plants to drought stress (Khan et al., 2004; Movahhedy-Dehnavy et al., 2009). Otherwise, drought stress has exerted a negative effect on relative water content of leaves (RWC), and durum wheat under water stress loses much more water than the bread wheat. Larbi et al. (2004), Akram (2011) and Keyvan (2010) indicated that increase in the intensity of drought stress decreased RWC, total chlorophyll and increased proline content. Also, Tale & Haddad (2011) stated that drought stress closes stomata, inhibits photosynthesis and damages the chlorophyll contents. Furthermore, Almeselmani et al. (2012) recorded reduction in all physiological traits, yield and yield component in D is a serious abiotic stress affects crop production in Egypt and worldwide. Two experiments were carried out under drought stress and normal irrigation during the seasons of 2018/19 and 2019/20 to study the effect of foliar application of Zn to alleviate drought stress. The soil texture is clay. The genetic materials were three Egyptian cultivars; Sakha 69, Giza 68 and Gemmieza 11. The levels of foliar spray of zinc oxide were 500ppm, 250 ppm, water and control (no treatment), sprayed two weeks before and at anthesis. Mean squares of the combined data was significant (P≤ 0.01) for Zn levels and for yield traits except for spike length. The differences among cultivars were significant (P≤ 0.01) except for yield under irrigation. This confirms the concept of “selection for yield under stress is better than under favorable environment”. The traits plant height (PH), number of spikes/plant (NS/P), biological yield/plant (BY/P), grain yield/plant (GY/P) and 100GW showed the best performance at the higher Zn level 500ppm. Water deficit exerted negative effects on RWC% and chlorophyll. The reduction % (the difference between irrigation and drought stress relative to irrigation performance) in all traits was the lowest at 500ppm of Zn and increased ascendingly by decreasing the Zn level. Sakha 69 significantly showed the best performance for PH, NS/P and BY/P under both, drought stress and normal irrigation. It could be concluded that Zn foliar application alleviated drought stress, and Sakha 69 was the most stable cultivar in GY/P and gave the best performance under drought stress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锌对部分小麦抗旱性的影响土壤水分减少下的栽培品种
收到09/11/2021;接受10/1/2022 DOI: 10.21608/agro.2022.105221.1291©2021国家信息文献中心(NIDOC)涉及许多生化途径(Alloway, 2009;Cakmak et al., 2017)。植物生长所需的一些微量元素的存在可以减轻脱水的影响。有趣的是,锌、B和锰的施用提高了植物对干旱胁迫的抗性(Khan等人,2004;Movahhedy-Dehnavy et al., 2009)。此外,干旱胁迫对叶片相对含水量(RWC)产生了负面影响,干旱胁迫下硬粒小麦的水分损失率明显高于面包小麦。Larbi et al.(2004)、Akram(2011)和Keyvan(2010)指出,干旱胁迫强度的增加降低了RWC、总叶绿素和脯氨酸含量。Tale & Haddad(2011)也指出,干旱胁迫关闭气孔,抑制光合作用,损害叶绿素含量。此外,Almeselmani等人(2012)记录了D的所有生理性状、产量和产量成分的减少,这是一种严重的非生物胁迫,影响埃及和全世界的作物生产。在2018/19和2019/20两季干旱胁迫和正常灌溉条件下,研究了叶面施锌缓解干旱胁迫的效果。土壤的质地是粘土。遗传物质为3个埃及栽培品种;萨哈69,吉萨68,吉米耶萨11。花前2周和花期喷施氧化锌,分别为500ppm、250ppm、水和对照(未处理)。除穗长外,锌水平和产量性状的均方差均极显著(P≤0.01)。除灌溉产量外,各品种间差异均极显著(P≤0.01)。这证实了“逆境条件下的产量选择优于有利环境”的概念。株高(PH)、穗数/株(NS/P)、生物产量/株(BY/P)、籽粒产量/株(GY/P)和100GW在高锌500ppm处理下表现最佳。水分亏缺对RWC%和叶绿素均有不利影响。各性状的降低率(灌溉和干旱胁迫相对于灌溉性能的差值)在500ppm Zn处理下最低,随Zn水平的降低而逐渐增大。在干旱胁迫和正常灌溉条件下,萨哈69在PH、NS/P和BY/P方面的表现均显著最佳。结果表明,叶面施锌缓解了干旱胁迫,萨哈69是干旱胁迫下土壤养分比最稳定、表现最好的品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Phyto-extraction Potential of Duranta erecta's Against Heavy Metal Assisting by EDTA and Citric Acid for Mitigating Industrial Polluted Soil Exploring genetic variation through line x tester analysis of sunflower genotypes for yield and oil traits under adverse environment Environmental stability and adaptation of several rice (Oryza Sativa L.) cultivars with different climate change . The possibility of using unmanned aerial vehicles in agricultural activities in Turkey Response of Growth, Productivity and Quality For Some Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Cultivars to Different Irrigation Regimes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1