Impact of promoters’ ownership and competition on firm’s value: a study of listed SMEs

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Indian Business Research Pub Date : 2022-09-20 DOI:10.1108/jibr-02-2022-0030
Kuldeep Singh, Shailesh Rastogi
{"title":"Impact of promoters’ ownership and competition on firm’s value: a study of listed SMEs","authors":"Kuldeep Singh, Shailesh Rastogi","doi":"10.1108/jibr-02-2022-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe public listing of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) is a recent phenomenon in India, started in 2012. Such a paradigm shift for SMEs has altered the ownership structure of these firms. In addition, the listing has provided a notable status to SMEs, leading to a shift in exposure to market competition. Literature signifies that these changing dynamics are likely to impact the firm value. This study aims to examine the effects of promoters’ ownership and market competition on the firm value of listed SMEs in India. Ownership concentration (promoters’ ownership) is investigated as the primary proxy for internal governance mechanism, while market competition is investigated as an external form of firm regulation.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThree years of panel data from 2018 to 2020 of 80 listed Indian SMEs are used to conduct the analysis. The fixed effects model and cluster robust standard errors captured the detected fixed effects while adjusting for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation. Besides, moderation analysis is conducted to test if competition regulates the relation between promoters’ ownership and firm value.\n\n\nFindings\nPromoters’ ownership does not impact the firm value significantly. However, market competition is significant and negatively drives the firm’s value. So, the market competition provides external regulation and coerces the firms to behave well to conserve the firm value. Finally, competition does not regulate the relationship between ownership effects and firm value. Therefore, the study contrasts the belief that the benefits of internal governance (especially promoters’ ownership) for firms in competitive economies are subject to market competition.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study establishes the possibility of an integrated approach where internal and external governance mechanisms coexist to drive the firm value and endorses the same. The study is relevant to shareholders, practitioners, lawmakers and academics.\n","PeriodicalId":45364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-02-2022-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The public listing of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) is a recent phenomenon in India, started in 2012. Such a paradigm shift for SMEs has altered the ownership structure of these firms. In addition, the listing has provided a notable status to SMEs, leading to a shift in exposure to market competition. Literature signifies that these changing dynamics are likely to impact the firm value. This study aims to examine the effects of promoters’ ownership and market competition on the firm value of listed SMEs in India. Ownership concentration (promoters’ ownership) is investigated as the primary proxy for internal governance mechanism, while market competition is investigated as an external form of firm regulation. Design/methodology/approach Three years of panel data from 2018 to 2020 of 80 listed Indian SMEs are used to conduct the analysis. The fixed effects model and cluster robust standard errors captured the detected fixed effects while adjusting for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation. Besides, moderation analysis is conducted to test if competition regulates the relation between promoters’ ownership and firm value. Findings Promoters’ ownership does not impact the firm value significantly. However, market competition is significant and negatively drives the firm’s value. So, the market competition provides external regulation and coerces the firms to behave well to conserve the firm value. Finally, competition does not regulate the relationship between ownership effects and firm value. Therefore, the study contrasts the belief that the benefits of internal governance (especially promoters’ ownership) for firms in competitive economies are subject to market competition. Originality/value The study establishes the possibility of an integrated approach where internal and external governance mechanisms coexist to drive the firm value and endorses the same. The study is relevant to shareholders, practitioners, lawmakers and academics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发起人所有权和竞争对企业价值的影响——基于上市中小企业的研究
目的中小企业公开上市是印度最近出现的一种现象,始于2012年。中小企业的这种模式转变改变了这些公司的所有权结构。此外,上市为中小企业提供了显著的地位,导致市场竞争风险的转移。文献表明,这些变化的动态可能会影响企业价值。本研究旨在检验发起人所有权和市场竞争对印度上市中小企业价值的影响。股权集中(发起人所有权)被视为内部治理机制的主要代表,而市场竞争被视为企业监管的外部形式。设计/方法/方法使用2018年至2020年80家印度上市中小企业的三年面板数据进行分析。固定效应模型和聚类鲁棒标准误差在调整异方差和自相关的同时捕获了检测到的固定效应。此外,还进行了适度性分析,以检验竞争是否调节了发起人所有权与企业价值之间的关系。FindingsPromoters的所有权不会对公司价值产生重大影响。然而,市场竞争是重要的,并对公司的价值产生负面影响。因此,市场竞争提供了外部监管,并迫使企业表现良好以保护企业价值。最后,竞争并没有调节所有权效应与企业价值之间的关系。因此,本研究对比了竞争经济中企业内部治理(尤其是发起人所有权)的利益受制于市场竞争的观点。独创性/价值该研究确立了一种综合方法的可能性,即内部和外部治理机制共存,以推动企业价值,并认可这一点。这项研究涉及股东、从业者、立法者和学者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Examining the relationship between organizational capabilities and business sustainability among start-ups: a dynamic capability view Empowering sustainability: understanding the users’ perceptions on the adoption of renewable energy technologies (RETs) through a systematic literature review Navigating GST revenue efficiency challenges: a solution to dilemma of policy makers for enhancing revenue efficiency Work-related boredom, felt deprivation and employee dissatisfaction: is being closer to the leader a bane? Financial literacy and its impact on life satisfaction in rural households: a mediated approach via financial self-efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1