Transfusion of blood products during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a narrative review of rationale, indications, impact on immune function and outcome

Annals of blood Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.21037/aob-21-32
Antonio Siragusa, C. Forlini, Benedetta Fumagalli, S. Redaelli, Dario Winterton, G. Foti, M. Giani
{"title":"Transfusion of blood products during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a narrative review of rationale, indications, impact on immune function and outcome","authors":"Antonio Siragusa, C. Forlini, Benedetta Fumagalli, S. Redaelli, Dario Winterton, G. Foti, M. Giani","doi":"10.21037/aob-21-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support poses several risks, particularly thrombosis and bleeding. As a result, transfusion of blood components is frequent during extracorporeal support. In this review we aim to describe the rationale and indications of blood products transfusions, and their impact on the immune function and outcome. The red blood cells (RBC) transfusion threshold is very debated, because of awareness of transfusion-associated adverse events due to liberal strategies. To date, no specific recommendations exist but a comprehensive physiologic approach appears feasible to evaluate the need for RBC transfusion. For patients without bleeding, the guidelines of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) suggest fresh frozen plasma (FFP) administration if the prothrombin time (PT) ratio is higher than 1.5–2.0 and/or there is significant bleeding. Conversely, for bleeding patient indications often refer to trauma guidelines, where it is recommended to use a 1:1 ratio of RBC and FFP in massive transfusion situations. The indications for antithrombin supplementation are unknown and large inhomogeneity exists between different ECMO centers and between pediatric and adult patients. Supplementation of fibrinogen is considered only for bleeding patients and/or with fibrinogen level below 100 or 150 mg/dL. ELSO guidelines suggest 25–50 IU/kg of prothrombin complex concentrate as an alternative to FFP for patients with active bleeding and a prolonged PT. Recombinant activated factor VII might be a potential therapeutic option for intractable bleeding despite conventional treatment but may cause life-threatening thrombotic complications. Platelet transfusions might be limited to cases of severe thrombocytopenia accompanied by bleeding. ELSO guidelines recommend a target of at least 80×10/L platelets. Liberal platelets transfusion thresholds may be reasonable in case of intracranial hemorrhage. Albeit rare, multiple adverse events of blood products transfusion are described. There is no evidence of transfusion-related acute lung injury during ECMO support, likely because of the difficulty to distinguish the cause of clinical worsening in patients with severe respiratory failure. Infections represent a major contributor on morbidity and mortality in ECMO patients. However, as of today, no literature has explored the impact of transfusions on immune function of ECMO patients. Currently, there are no specific guidelines for transfusions in ECMO patients and the management is highly variable among centers. Further research is warranted on this topic.","PeriodicalId":72211,"journal":{"name":"Annals of blood","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of blood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aob-21-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support poses several risks, particularly thrombosis and bleeding. As a result, transfusion of blood components is frequent during extracorporeal support. In this review we aim to describe the rationale and indications of blood products transfusions, and their impact on the immune function and outcome. The red blood cells (RBC) transfusion threshold is very debated, because of awareness of transfusion-associated adverse events due to liberal strategies. To date, no specific recommendations exist but a comprehensive physiologic approach appears feasible to evaluate the need for RBC transfusion. For patients without bleeding, the guidelines of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) suggest fresh frozen plasma (FFP) administration if the prothrombin time (PT) ratio is higher than 1.5–2.0 and/or there is significant bleeding. Conversely, for bleeding patient indications often refer to trauma guidelines, where it is recommended to use a 1:1 ratio of RBC and FFP in massive transfusion situations. The indications for antithrombin supplementation are unknown and large inhomogeneity exists between different ECMO centers and between pediatric and adult patients. Supplementation of fibrinogen is considered only for bleeding patients and/or with fibrinogen level below 100 or 150 mg/dL. ELSO guidelines suggest 25–50 IU/kg of prothrombin complex concentrate as an alternative to FFP for patients with active bleeding and a prolonged PT. Recombinant activated factor VII might be a potential therapeutic option for intractable bleeding despite conventional treatment but may cause life-threatening thrombotic complications. Platelet transfusions might be limited to cases of severe thrombocytopenia accompanied by bleeding. ELSO guidelines recommend a target of at least 80×10/L platelets. Liberal platelets transfusion thresholds may be reasonable in case of intracranial hemorrhage. Albeit rare, multiple adverse events of blood products transfusion are described. There is no evidence of transfusion-related acute lung injury during ECMO support, likely because of the difficulty to distinguish the cause of clinical worsening in patients with severe respiratory failure. Infections represent a major contributor on morbidity and mortality in ECMO patients. However, as of today, no literature has explored the impact of transfusions on immune function of ECMO patients. Currently, there are no specific guidelines for transfusions in ECMO patients and the management is highly variable among centers. Further research is warranted on this topic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外膜肺氧合期间血液制品的输注:原理、适应症、对免疫功能的影响和结果的叙述性综述
使用体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)支持会带来一些风险,尤其是血栓形成和出血。因此,在体外支持期间,血液成分的输注是频繁的。在这篇综述中,我们旨在描述血液制品输血的原理和适应症,以及它们对免疫功能和结果的影响。红细胞(RBC)输注阈值是非常有争议的,因为由于自由策略,人们意识到与输注相关的不良事件。到目前为止,还没有具体的建议,但综合的生理学方法似乎是可行的,可以评估红细胞输注的必要性。对于没有出血的患者,体外生命支持组织(ELSO)的指南建议,如果凝血酶原时间(PT)比率高于1.5-2.0和/或有明显出血,则给予新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)。相反,对于出血患者,指征通常参考创伤指南,其中建议在大量输血的情况下使用1:1的红细胞和FFP。补充抗凝血酶的适应症尚不清楚,不同ECMO中心之间以及儿童和成人患者之间存在很大的不均匀性。只有出血患者和/或纤维蛋白原水平低于100或150 mg/dL的患者才考虑补充纤维蛋白原。ELSO指南建议,对于活动性出血和PT延长的患者,25–50 IU/kg的凝血酶原复合物浓缩物可作为FFP的替代品。尽管进行了常规治疗,但重组活化因子VII可能是顽固性出血的潜在治疗选择,但可能会导致危及生命的血栓并发症。血小板输注可能仅限于伴有出血的严重血小板减少症病例。ELSO指南建议靶点至少为80×10/L血小板。在颅内出血的情况下,自由血小板输注阈值可能是合理的。尽管血液制品输注的不良事件非常罕见,但仍有多种描述。在ECMO支持期间,没有证据表明与输血相关的急性肺损伤,可能是因为难以区分严重呼吸衰竭患者临床恶化的原因。感染是ECMO患者发病率和死亡率的主要因素。然而,到目前为止,还没有文献探讨输血对ECMO患者免疫功能的影响。目前,ECMO患者没有具体的输血指南,各中心的管理也存在很大差异。有必要对这一主题进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introductory comments about the special series of thrombotic microangiopathy. The history of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura research: a narrative review. Blinatumomab as frontline therapy for B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a critically ill young adult: a case report Intravenous immunoglobulin can induce antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and upregulate FCGR3A and FcγRIIIA expression in vitro Rh D-positive genotypes in Brazilian blood donors with D-negative phenotype
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1