«Something else too abominable to be nam'd». David Hume and Greek Love

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.3280/sf2022-001004
E. Mazza
{"title":"«Something else too abominable to be nam'd». David Hume and Greek Love","authors":"E. Mazza","doi":"10.3280/sf2022-001004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"«Greek Love is a modern invention», asserts the classical scholar. David Hume can claim the title of inventor. In his 1751 Dialogue on morals he used the phrase to account for the relationship between a university boy and a man of merit. How did Hume come to this expression? Pederasty was a traditional sceptical topic against a universal standard for morals. What did Hume think of this practice and its origin? When he accounts for pederasty and homosocial arrangements by negative epithets, is Hume seriously condemning them or he is «only» and prudentially following the common use? The Article tries to give a first answer to these questions by examining Hume's writings and their sources (Plato, Plutarch, Cornelius Nepos and Cicero), and the views of the modern authors (Hobbes, Mandeville, Montesquieu, Charlemont, Smollet and Voltaire). The Article delineates the eighteenth-century debate, without projecting on it our views, and maintains that, like some ancient philosophers according to Sextus Empricus, and possibly like Smith, Hume would have declared practice in itself «indifferent».","PeriodicalId":42923,"journal":{"name":"RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/sf2022-001004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

«Greek Love is a modern invention», asserts the classical scholar. David Hume can claim the title of inventor. In his 1751 Dialogue on morals he used the phrase to account for the relationship between a university boy and a man of merit. How did Hume come to this expression? Pederasty was a traditional sceptical topic against a universal standard for morals. What did Hume think of this practice and its origin? When he accounts for pederasty and homosocial arrangements by negative epithets, is Hume seriously condemning them or he is «only» and prudentially following the common use? The Article tries to give a first answer to these questions by examining Hume's writings and their sources (Plato, Plutarch, Cornelius Nepos and Cicero), and the views of the modern authors (Hobbes, Mandeville, Montesquieu, Charlemont, Smollet and Voltaire). The Article delineates the eighteenth-century debate, without projecting on it our views, and maintains that, like some ancient philosophers according to Sextus Empricus, and possibly like Smith, Hume would have declared practice in itself «indifferent».
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“还有一件难以启齿的事。”大卫·休谟与希腊爱情
“希腊的爱情是现代的发明”,古典学者断言。大卫·休谟可以称得上是发明家。在他1751年关于道德的对话中,他用这个短语来描述一个大学生和一个有价值的人之间的关系。休谟是如何得出这个表达的?鸡奸是一个传统的质疑话题,反对普遍的道德标准。休谟如何看待这种实践及其起源?当他用负面的形容词来解释鸡奸和同性恋社会安排时,休谟是在严肃地谴责它们,还是他“只是”谨慎地遵循这些常用的用法?本文试图通过考察休谟的作品及其来源(柏拉图、普鲁塔克、尼波斯和西塞罗),以及现代作者(霍布斯、曼德维尔、孟德斯鸠、查理蒙、斯摩列和伏尔泰)的观点,来初步回答这些问题。这篇文章描述了18世纪的辩论,没有投射我们的观点,并坚持认为,就像塞克斯图斯·恩普里乌斯(Sextus Empricus)的一些古代哲学家一样,可能也像史密斯一样,休谟会宣称实践本身是“无关紧要的”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Fondata nel 1946 da Mario Dal Pra, La rivista di storia della filosofia si è presto distinta, in Italia e all’estero, per aver affrontato con novità di ipotesi e con rigoroso riscontro filologico, temi e problemi dell’intera tradizione storica del pensiero occidentale. Ha dedicato fascicoli monografici al pensiero di Dewey, Russel, Carnap, Vailati, Hobbes , Hume, Aristotele, Epicuro, Abelardo, Husserl, Kant e Hegel; ha pubblicato e pubblica studi sui problemi di maggiore interesse della storia del pensiero; rende noti testi inediti e documenti; affronta l’esame degli aspetti più significativi del dibattito filosofico contemporaneo.
期刊最新文献
Libri ricevuti Recensioni Spinoza e la temporalità plurale. Dalla teoria del tempo alla teoria della storia Spinoza nel XXI secolo: la nuova edizione critica dell'Ethica e l'orizzonte delle ricerche spinoziane tra Francia e Italia Tra sociniani e impostori: Spinoza e l'Islam. Alcuni appunti
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1