Understanding the online relationship between politicians and citizens. A study on the user engagement of politicians’ Facebook posts in election and routine periods

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Information Technology & Politics Pub Date : 2022-02-17 DOI:10.1080/19331681.2022.2029791
J. Peeters, M. Opgenhaffen, Tim Kreutz, Peter van Aelst
{"title":"Understanding the online relationship between politicians and citizens. A study on the user engagement of politicians’ Facebook posts in election and routine periods","authors":"J. Peeters, M. Opgenhaffen, Tim Kreutz, Peter van Aelst","doi":"10.1080/19331681.2022.2029791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Social media have offered politicians a way to reach a broader audience and citizens a dynamic way to respond and interact with politicians’ communication. In this study we focus on how two important dimensions of the social media messages of politicians impact different types of user engagement: the distinction between political and private posts and the degree of emotionality of the post. Additionally, we compare the amount and types of interaction between routine periods and election periods. Supported by automatic data gathering and coding we analyze all Facebook posts of 124 Belgian politicians for a period of more than two years (N = 34,408). Our results indicate that different types of Facebook posts lead to different types of user engagement. Private posts generate more reactions, while political posts are more often shared and commented on. Additionally, Facebook posts with positive, and, negative emotional language garner more interaction than those with less emotionality. Finally, during election campaigns both politicians and citizens are more active. There is a proliferation of the amount of Facebook messages that politicians post, and these messages also score higher on engagement.","PeriodicalId":47047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","volume":"20 1","pages":"44 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2029791","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social media have offered politicians a way to reach a broader audience and citizens a dynamic way to respond and interact with politicians’ communication. In this study we focus on how two important dimensions of the social media messages of politicians impact different types of user engagement: the distinction between political and private posts and the degree of emotionality of the post. Additionally, we compare the amount and types of interaction between routine periods and election periods. Supported by automatic data gathering and coding we analyze all Facebook posts of 124 Belgian politicians for a period of more than two years (N = 34,408). Our results indicate that different types of Facebook posts lead to different types of user engagement. Private posts generate more reactions, while political posts are more often shared and commented on. Additionally, Facebook posts with positive, and, negative emotional language garner more interaction than those with less emotionality. Finally, during election campaigns both politicians and citizens are more active. There is a proliferation of the amount of Facebook messages that politicians post, and these messages also score higher on engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解政治家和公民之间的网络关系。选举期和日常期政治家Facebook帖子的用户参与度研究
摘要社交媒体为政治家提供了一种接触更广泛受众的方式,为公民提供了一个动态的方式来回应和互动政治家的沟通。在这项研究中,我们重点关注政治家社交媒体信息的两个重要维度如何影响不同类型的用户参与:政治帖子和私人帖子之间的区别以及帖子的情绪化程度。此外,我们还比较了常规时段和选举时段之间的互动数量和类型。在自动数据收集和编码的支持下,我们分析了124名比利时政客在两年多的时间里在Facebook上发布的所有帖子(N=34408)。我们的研究结果表明,不同类型的Facebook帖子会导致不同类型的用户参与。私人帖子会引起更多的反应,而政治帖子则更经常被分享和评论。此外,脸书上使用积极和消极情绪语言的帖子比那些情绪化程度较低的帖子获得了更多的互动。最后,在竞选期间,政治家和公民都更加积极。政客们在脸书上发布的信息数量激增,这些信息的参与度也更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Partisan news recommendations. Studying the effect of politicians’ online news sharing on news credibility From tweets to tensions: exploring the roots of political polarization in Turkish constitutional referendum Self-interest and preferences for the regulation of artificial intelligence Critical social media and political engagement in authoritarian regimes: the role of state media fairness perceptions Social media and political contention - challenges and opportunities for comparative research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1