Ukrainian language proficiency test review

IF 2.2 1区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Testing Pub Date : 2023-03-14 DOI:10.1177/02655322231156819
Daniil M. Ozernyi, Ruslan Suvorov
{"title":"Ukrainian language proficiency test review","authors":"Daniil M. Ozernyi, Ruslan Suvorov","doi":"10.1177/02655322231156819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ukrainian Language Proficiency (ULP) test, officially titled Exam of the level of mastery of the official language (Ispyt na riven’ volodinnya derzhavnoyu movoyu) is a new test launched in Summer 2021. The name of the test in Ukrainian, incidentally, does not contain the words “Ukrainian” or “foreign language.” According to the state regulations (Kabinet Ministriv Ukrayiny [KMU], 2021a; Natsional’na Komisiya zi Standartiv Derzhavnoyi Movy [NKSDM], 2021a, 2021b), the levels of mastery of Ukrainian in the test are aligned with the CEFR levels.1 The test was introduced as a product of the law about the official language of Ukraine, which mandated that civil servants and citizens who are being naturalized are fully able to use Ukrainian in performing their duties. The ULP test comprises two versions: (a) ULP for acquisition of Ukrainian citizenship (Ispyt na riven’ volodinnya derzhavnoyu movoyu (dlya nabuttya hromadyanstva)), and (b) ULP 2.0 for holding civil office (Ispyt na riven’ volodinnya derzhavnoyu movoyu 2.0 (dlya vykonannya sluzhbovyh obov’yazkiv)). To differentiate between the two versions of the test in this review, we will refer to the former version as ULP-C and to the latter version as ULP 2.0. The purpose of this review is to apply Kunnan’s (2018) fairness and justice framework to evaluate both ULP-C and ULP 2.0 since they are united by (a) the alignment with the CEFR scale which poses ULP 2.0 as a continuation of ULP-C, (b) the same","PeriodicalId":17928,"journal":{"name":"Language Testing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Testing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322231156819","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ukrainian Language Proficiency (ULP) test, officially titled Exam of the level of mastery of the official language (Ispyt na riven’ volodinnya derzhavnoyu movoyu) is a new test launched in Summer 2021. The name of the test in Ukrainian, incidentally, does not contain the words “Ukrainian” or “foreign language.” According to the state regulations (Kabinet Ministriv Ukrayiny [KMU], 2021a; Natsional’na Komisiya zi Standartiv Derzhavnoyi Movy [NKSDM], 2021a, 2021b), the levels of mastery of Ukrainian in the test are aligned with the CEFR levels.1 The test was introduced as a product of the law about the official language of Ukraine, which mandated that civil servants and citizens who are being naturalized are fully able to use Ukrainian in performing their duties. The ULP test comprises two versions: (a) ULP for acquisition of Ukrainian citizenship (Ispyt na riven’ volodinnya derzhavnoyu movoyu (dlya nabuttya hromadyanstva)), and (b) ULP 2.0 for holding civil office (Ispyt na riven’ volodinnya derzhavnoyu movoyu 2.0 (dlya vykonannya sluzhbovyh obov’yazkiv)). To differentiate between the two versions of the test in this review, we will refer to the former version as ULP-C and to the latter version as ULP 2.0. The purpose of this review is to apply Kunnan’s (2018) fairness and justice framework to evaluate both ULP-C and ULP 2.0 since they are united by (a) the alignment with the CEFR scale which poses ULP 2.0 as a continuation of ULP-C, (b) the same
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰语能力测试审查
乌克兰语言能力(ULP)测试,正式名称为官方语言掌握水平考试(Ispyt na riven ' volodinnya derzhavnoyu movoyu),是2021年夏季推出的一项新测试。顺便说一句,乌克兰语的考试名称中没有“乌克兰语”或“外语”这两个词。根据国家规定(Kabinet Ministriv ukraine [KMU], 2021a;[NKSDM], 2021a, 2021b]),测试中乌克兰语的掌握水平与CEFR水平一致这项考试是乌克兰官方语言法律的产物,该法律规定,正在入籍的公务员和公民在履行职责时完全能够使用乌克兰语。ULP测试包括两个版本:(a)获得乌克兰公民身份的ULP (Ispyt na riven ' volodinnya derzhavnoyu movoyu (dlya nabuttya hrmadyanstva))和(b)担任公务员的ULP 2.0 (Ispyt na riven ' volodinnya derzhavnoyu movoyu 2.0 (dlya vykonannya sluzhbovyh obov ' yazkiv))。为了区分本综述中测试的两个版本,我们将前一个版本称为ULP- c,后一个版本称为ULP 2.0。本综述的目的是应用昆南(2018)的公平和正义框架来评估ULP- c和ULP 2.0,因为它们是由(a)与CEFR量表的一致性统一的,这使得ULP 2.0作为ULP- c的延续,(b)相同
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language Testing
Language Testing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.80%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Language Testing is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on language testing and assessment. It provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and information between people working in the fields of first and second language testing and assessment. This includes researchers and practitioners in EFL and ESL testing, and assessment in child language acquisition and language pathology. In addition, special attention is focused on issues of testing theory, experimental investigations, and the following up of practical implications.
期刊最新文献
Open access in language testing and assessment: The case of two flagship journals Authenticity of academic lecture passages in high-stakes tests: A temporal fluency perspective A Context-Aligned Two Thousand Test: Toward estimating high-frequency French vocabulary knowledge for beginner-to-low intermediate proficiency adolescent learners in England A scoping review of research on second language test preparation The effect of viewing visual cues in a listening comprehension test on second language learners’ test-taking process and performance: An eye-tracking study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1