Social workers’ perceptions of intimate relationships of people with intellectual disabilities in residential settings

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Social Work Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1177/14680173231165929
R. Holler, Chen Bondorevsky-Heyman
{"title":"Social workers’ perceptions of intimate relationships of people with intellectual disabilities in residential settings","authors":"R. Holler, Chen Bondorevsky-Heyman","doi":"10.1177/14680173231165929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary People with intellectual disabilities still struggle to enjoy intimate and sexual relationships. Social workers have a potentially key role in realizing the intimate and sexual rights of people with intellectual disabilities, particularly in residential settings. However, we still know relatively little about the meaning social workers attribute to such relationships. The present study addresses this lacuna by examining the perceptions and practices of 15 Israeli social workers in residential settings. Findings Drawing on thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews, two key themes are identified: (1) Intimate relationships as a human need, and (2) Intimacy with a question mark. Combined, these themes depict an ambivalent position toward residents’ intimate and sexual relationships. Applications The study's findings highlight the need to incorporate intimacy and sexuality within social work education, with a particular focus on people with intellectual disabilities and positive aspects of intimacy and sexuality. From a policy perspective, the findings urge state and professional authorities to develop national guidelines on realizing intimate rights.","PeriodicalId":47142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173231165929","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary People with intellectual disabilities still struggle to enjoy intimate and sexual relationships. Social workers have a potentially key role in realizing the intimate and sexual rights of people with intellectual disabilities, particularly in residential settings. However, we still know relatively little about the meaning social workers attribute to such relationships. The present study addresses this lacuna by examining the perceptions and practices of 15 Israeli social workers in residential settings. Findings Drawing on thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews, two key themes are identified: (1) Intimate relationships as a human need, and (2) Intimacy with a question mark. Combined, these themes depict an ambivalent position toward residents’ intimate and sexual relationships. Applications The study's findings highlight the need to incorporate intimacy and sexuality within social work education, with a particular focus on people with intellectual disabilities and positive aspects of intimacy and sexuality. From a policy perspective, the findings urge state and professional authorities to develop national guidelines on realizing intimate rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会工作者对居住环境中智障人士亲密关系的认知
摘要智障人士仍然难以享受亲密关系和性关系。社会工作者在实现智障人士的亲密权利和性权利方面发挥着潜在的关键作用,尤其是在居住环境中。然而,我们对社会工作者赋予这种关系的意义仍然知之甚少。本研究通过调查15名以色列社会工作者在居住环境中的看法和做法来解决这一空白。研究结果根据半结构化访谈的主题分析,确定了两个关键主题:(1)亲密关系是人类的需求,(2)有问号的亲密关系。综合起来,这些主题描绘了居民对亲密关系和性关系的矛盾立场。应用该研究的发现强调了将亲密关系和性行为纳入社会工作教育的必要性,特别关注智障人士以及亲密和性行为的积极方面。从政策角度来看,调查结果敦促国家和专业当局制定关于实现亲密权利的国家指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social Work
Journal of Social Work SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work is a forum for the publication, dissemination and debate of key ideas and research in social work. The journal aims to advance theoretical understanding, shape policy, and inform practice, and welcomes submissions from all areas of social work.
期刊最新文献
Contested places: A typology for responding to place-based harms Book Review: Disability practice: Safeguarding quality service delivery by Christine Bigby and Alan Hough Book Review: Women and the criminal justice system: Gender, race and class by Katherine Stuart van Wormer and Clemens Bartollas Book Review: Social work for poverty alleviation by Deping Xiang Book Review: The curious case of Natalia Grace, documentary series by Christian and Jackson Conway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1