Basileus Meets Imperator: Herod’s Evolving Honors to Augustus

Barbara C. Burrell
{"title":"Basileus Meets Imperator: Herod’s Evolving Honors to Augustus","authors":"Barbara C. Burrell","doi":"10.1086/711078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses recent finds and reinterpretations (archaeological, epigraphic, and historical) to re-examine and place in a wider context Herod the Great’s actions towards honoring Augustus in his realm. As a king formerly allied with Antony, Herod needed to placate Augustus quickly after Actium. At first he showered his new overlord with service, money, and supplies, but it may have been in imitation of cities like Pergamon in Asia that he established a festival in Augustus’s honor in Jerusalem. We hear nothing of actual temples, however, until after Augustus granted Herod new territories; it was there, in non-Jewish areas, that Herod founded cities (which was what kings did), named them in honor of his sole superior, and built in them temples to Augustus and Roma, perhaps again on the model of Hellenic cities of Asia or Bithynia, or of Alexandria in Egypt. Herod did this not for the sake of Hellenization or Romanization, but to reify his relationship with Augustus before his kingdom and the world, enshrining him in the sole place in the hierarchy that a king could tolerate, and also, not incidentally, to show his own magnificence.","PeriodicalId":45895,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research","volume":"384 1","pages":"45 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/711078","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/711078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper uses recent finds and reinterpretations (archaeological, epigraphic, and historical) to re-examine and place in a wider context Herod the Great’s actions towards honoring Augustus in his realm. As a king formerly allied with Antony, Herod needed to placate Augustus quickly after Actium. At first he showered his new overlord with service, money, and supplies, but it may have been in imitation of cities like Pergamon in Asia that he established a festival in Augustus’s honor in Jerusalem. We hear nothing of actual temples, however, until after Augustus granted Herod new territories; it was there, in non-Jewish areas, that Herod founded cities (which was what kings did), named them in honor of his sole superior, and built in them temples to Augustus and Roma, perhaps again on the model of Hellenic cities of Asia or Bithynia, or of Alexandria in Egypt. Herod did this not for the sake of Hellenization or Romanization, but to reify his relationship with Augustus before his kingdom and the world, enshrining him in the sole place in the hierarchy that a king could tolerate, and also, not incidentally, to show his own magnificence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴塞勒斯遇见皇帝:希律王对奥古斯都的荣誉
本文使用最近的发现和重新解释(考古,铭文和历史)来重新审视和在更广泛的背景下,希律大帝对奥古斯都的尊敬。希律曾与安东尼结盟,他需要在亚克兴之后迅速安抚奥古斯都。起初,他给他的新霸主提供了大量的服务、金钱和物资,但可能是模仿亚洲的帕加马等城市,他在耶路撒冷设立了一个节日来纪念奥古斯都。然而,在奥古斯都赐给希律新领土之前,我们没有听到任何实际的神庙;希律就是在那里,在非犹太人的地区建立了城市(这是国王们所做的),以他唯一的上司的名字命名,并在其中建造了奥古斯都和罗马的神庙,也许又是以亚洲、比提尼亚或埃及亚历山大的希腊城市为模型的。希律这样做不是为了希腊化或罗马化,而是为了在他的王国和世界面前,将他与奥古斯都的关系具体化,将他置于国王所能容忍的等级制度中唯一的位置,同时,也不是偶然的,显示他自己的辉煌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optic Nerve Biopsies in Unexplained Progressive Optic Neuropathy in Two Adults Reveal Optic Nerve Gliomas. Congenital adult tracheoesophageal fistula repair with transthoracic ventilation: a case report. From the Editors, Fall 2021 Back Matter Framing Archaeology in the Near East: The Application of Social Theory to Fieldwork, ed. by Ianir Milevski and Thomas E. Levy. New Directions in Anthropological Archaeology. Bristol, CT: Equinox Publishing, 2016. 156 pp., 13 figures. Hardcover $100.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1