Supply chain green strategy considering manufacturers’ financial constraints: how to manage the risk of green supply chain financing

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Annals of Operations Research Pub Date : 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1007/s10479-023-05239-z
Zhixuan Lai, Gaoxiang Lou, Linsen Yin, Haicheng Ma, Xuechen Tu
{"title":"Supply chain green strategy considering manufacturers’ financial constraints: how to manage the risk of green supply chain financing","authors":"Zhixuan Lai,&nbsp;Gaoxiang Lou,&nbsp;Linsen Yin,&nbsp;Haicheng Ma,&nbsp;Xuechen Tu","doi":"10.1007/s10479-023-05239-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Supply chain members have a variety of green strategic choices in the context of manufacturer’ capital-constrained green supply chains. This paper investigates two types of single-dimensional suppliers’ green strategies (Combination of green practices and financing schemes): the green supply (GS) and green manufacturing (GM) strategies. The GS strategy implies that suppliers implement the GS practice independently; the GM strategy indicates that suppliers provide a green credit guarantee (GCG) to manufacturers to help them implement GM practices. In both green strategies, manufacturers need to solve their production capitals through bank credit financing (BCF). Comparing the GS and GM strategies, this paper aims to identify suppliers preferred green strategy. The results show that, compared to the benchmark case without any green strategy, the GS strategy can effectively improve suppliers’ profits, but the GM strategy cannot. Even if the unit investment cost of the GS practice is higher, suppliers will still implement this strategy when the GCG coefficient is high and manufacturer’s initial capital is low. Furthermore, this paper incorporates green marketing (GA) into GS and GM strategies, investigates two types of dual-dimensional supply chain green strategies (GS-with-GA and GM-with-GA), to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the dual-dimensional green strategy and single-dimensional green strategy. The conclusions show that compared to the single-dimensional green strategy, the dual-dimensional green strategy can improve product greenness and supply chain efficiency, but it does not necessarily improve manufacturer’s profit, especially when both the demand uncertainty level and manufacturer’s initial capital are high. This paper contributes to the literature on operational risk management by guiding enterprises to develop operational and financing strategies to reduce potential operational and financing risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8215,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Operations Research","volume":"348 2","pages":"1037 - 1068"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-023-05239-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supply chain members have a variety of green strategic choices in the context of manufacturer’ capital-constrained green supply chains. This paper investigates two types of single-dimensional suppliers’ green strategies (Combination of green practices and financing schemes): the green supply (GS) and green manufacturing (GM) strategies. The GS strategy implies that suppliers implement the GS practice independently; the GM strategy indicates that suppliers provide a green credit guarantee (GCG) to manufacturers to help them implement GM practices. In both green strategies, manufacturers need to solve their production capitals through bank credit financing (BCF). Comparing the GS and GM strategies, this paper aims to identify suppliers preferred green strategy. The results show that, compared to the benchmark case without any green strategy, the GS strategy can effectively improve suppliers’ profits, but the GM strategy cannot. Even if the unit investment cost of the GS practice is higher, suppliers will still implement this strategy when the GCG coefficient is high and manufacturer’s initial capital is low. Furthermore, this paper incorporates green marketing (GA) into GS and GM strategies, investigates two types of dual-dimensional supply chain green strategies (GS-with-GA and GM-with-GA), to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the dual-dimensional green strategy and single-dimensional green strategy. The conclusions show that compared to the single-dimensional green strategy, the dual-dimensional green strategy can improve product greenness and supply chain efficiency, but it does not necessarily improve manufacturer’s profit, especially when both the demand uncertainty level and manufacturer’s initial capital are high. This paper contributes to the literature on operational risk management by guiding enterprises to develop operational and financing strategies to reduce potential operational and financing risks.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑制造商财务约束的供应链绿色战略:绿色供应链融资的风险管理
在制造商资本约束的绿色供应链背景下,供应链成员有多种绿色战略选择。本文研究了两种单一维度供应商的绿色战略(绿色实践与融资方案相结合):绿色供应(GS)和绿色制造(GM)战略。GS战略意味着供应商独立实施GS实践;通用战略表明,供应商向制造商提供绿色信用担保(GCG),以帮助他们实施通用实践。在这两种绿色战略中,制造商都需要通过银行信贷融资(BCF)来解决生产资金问题。通过对绿色战略和通用战略的比较,找出供应商的绿色战略偏好。结果表明,与没有绿色战略的基准案例相比,GS战略能够有效地提高供应商的利润,而GM战略则不能。即使GS实践的单位投资成本较高,当GCG系数较高而制造商初始资本较低时,供应商仍会实施该策略。在此基础上,本文将绿色营销(GA)引入到供应链绿色战略和通用战略中,研究了两种二维供应链绿色战略(GS-with-GA和GM-with-GA),分析了二维绿色战略和一维绿色战略的优缺点。研究结果表明,与单维绿色战略相比,二维绿色战略可以提高产品的绿色度和供应链的效率,但并不一定能提高制造商的利润,尤其是在需求不确定性水平和制造商初始资本都很高的情况下。本文通过指导企业制定经营和融资策略,降低潜在的经营和融资风险,为经营风险管理的文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Operations Research
Annals of Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
596
审稿时长
8.4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Operations Research publishes peer-reviewed original articles dealing with key aspects of operations research, including theory, practice, and computation. The journal publishes full-length research articles, short notes, expositions and surveys, reports on computational studies, and case studies that present new and innovative practical applications. In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes periodic special volumes that focus on defined fields of operations research, ranging from the highly theoretical to the algorithmic and the applied. These volumes have one or more Guest Editors who are responsible for collecting the papers and overseeing the refereeing process.
期刊最新文献
Operations research in the 21st century: XXI Latin-Iberoamerican Conference on Operations Research, CLAIO 2022 Correction: Distributionally robust chance-constrained game model for portfolio selection in financial market Modelling and optimising switching on a physical binary sorter Data-driven approach under varying operating conditions for bearing fault diagnosis Well-Posedness of vector optimistic and robust optimization problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1