Health Professional’s Experience Of Telehealth Usability In The Care Of Patients With Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDS), From The COVID-19 Pandemic Onwards: A Cross-Sectional Study Protocol

R. L. Gonçalves, A. Pagano, K. Brackstone, S. Afagbedzi, Michael Head, T. Lopes, S. A. Cordeiro, J. M. Nunes, Wagner Meira Junior, L. Zambrano, James Batchelor, A. L. P. Ribeiro
{"title":"Health Professional’s Experience Of Telehealth Usability In The Care Of Patients With Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDS), From The COVID-19 Pandemic Onwards: A Cross-Sectional Study Protocol","authors":"R. L. Gonçalves, A. Pagano, K. Brackstone, S. Afagbedzi, Michael Head, T. Lopes, S. A. Cordeiro, J. M. Nunes, Wagner Meira Junior, L. Zambrano, James Batchelor, A. L. P. Ribeiro","doi":"10.21801/ppcrj.2023.91.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Even with the increased use of telehealth from the COVID-19 pandemic onward, there needs to be more knowledge about its usability for patients with non-communicable diseases from the point of view of the health professional, which is the main objective of this study. The secondary objectives will be to describe the user’s profile, discuss the usability of telehealth in different contexts and correlate it with the characteristics of the user’s profile. Methods: Protocol of the cross-sectional, prospective, multicenter, international study involving Brazil, Ghana, Honduras, and the United Kingdom. We will evaluate the usability of telehealth systems with an electronic form with the usability questionnaire of the Usability Scale System (SUS). The study has obtained ethical approval in each country and will be carried out independently. This analysis will consider the use context, such as country and geosocial conditions, age, gender, profession, and user experience. We will analyze usability (continuous dependent variable) with simple statistics with measures of central tendency. We will use ANOVA/Kruskal Wallis to analyze the usability difference between countries. If there are differences, we will use Bonferroni post hoc tests (p<0.05). We will use the Pearson/Spearman correlation coefficient to correlate the characteristics of the user’s profile with usability. If the dependent variable data are normally distributed, we will use linear regression to correct for known confounders. Discussion: Studying the usability of a system allows for understanding the subjective factors that determine its practical use, improving the experience of human-computer interaction.","PeriodicalId":74496,"journal":{"name":"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Principles and practice of clinical research (2015)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21801/ppcrj.2023.91.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Even with the increased use of telehealth from the COVID-19 pandemic onward, there needs to be more knowledge about its usability for patients with non-communicable diseases from the point of view of the health professional, which is the main objective of this study. The secondary objectives will be to describe the user’s profile, discuss the usability of telehealth in different contexts and correlate it with the characteristics of the user’s profile. Methods: Protocol of the cross-sectional, prospective, multicenter, international study involving Brazil, Ghana, Honduras, and the United Kingdom. We will evaluate the usability of telehealth systems with an electronic form with the usability questionnaire of the Usability Scale System (SUS). The study has obtained ethical approval in each country and will be carried out independently. This analysis will consider the use context, such as country and geosocial conditions, age, gender, profession, and user experience. We will analyze usability (continuous dependent variable) with simple statistics with measures of central tendency. We will use ANOVA/Kruskal Wallis to analyze the usability difference between countries. If there are differences, we will use Bonferroni post hoc tests (p<0.05). We will use the Pearson/Spearman correlation coefficient to correlate the characteristics of the user’s profile with usability. If the dependent variable data are normally distributed, we will use linear regression to correct for known confounders. Discussion: Studying the usability of a system allows for understanding the subjective factors that determine its practical use, improving the experience of human-computer interaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从新冠肺炎大流行开始,卫生专业人员在非传染性疾病(NCDS)患者护理中远程医疗可用性的经验:跨部门研究方案
导语:即使从COVID-19大流行开始,远程医疗的使用有所增加,但从卫生专业人员的角度来看,需要更多地了解其对非传染性疾病患者的可用性,这是本研究的主要目的。次要目标将是描述用户概况,讨论远程保健在不同情况下的可用性,并将其与用户概况的特征联系起来。方法:横断面、前瞻性、多中心、国际研究方案,涉及巴西、加纳、洪都拉斯和英国。我们将用可用性量表系统(SUS)的可用性问卷的电子表格来评估远程医疗系统的可用性。该研究已在每个国家获得伦理批准,并将独立进行。该分析将考虑使用环境,例如国家和地理社会条件、年龄、性别、职业和用户体验。我们将分析可用性(连续因变量)与简单的统计与集中趋势的措施。我们将使用方差分析/Kruskal Wallis来分析国家之间的可用性差异。如果有差异,我们将使用Bonferroni事后检验(p<0.05)。我们将使用Pearson/Spearman相关系数将用户个人资料的特征与可用性联系起来。如果因变量数据是正态分布的,我们将使用线性回归来校正已知的混杂因素。讨论:研究系统的可用性可以理解决定其实际用途的主观因素,从而改善人机交互的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for phantom limb pain: from pilot mechanistic studies to large clinical studies. Enhancing Dissemination and Understanding in Clinical Research Protocols: Optimizing Visual Communication in a Phantom Limb Pain Clinical Trial. Physical Conditioning, Obesity and Fibromyalgia: Causal Relationship or Confounding? Editorial - Seeking Brain Homeostatic Compensatory Mechanisms for Pain Control. XIV International Symposium of Neuromodulation: Conference Abstracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1