What do popular YouTube videos say about genetically modified foods? A content analysis

Sawyer I. Basch , Lalitha Samuel , Joseph Fera
{"title":"What do popular YouTube videos say about genetically modified foods? A content analysis","authors":"Sawyer I. Basch ,&nbsp;Lalitha Samuel ,&nbsp;Joseph Fera","doi":"10.1016/j.dialog.2023.100131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>YouTube is one of the most popular media sharing platforms that facilitates both professionals and lay people to participate in dissemination of knowledge and opinions. Its wide-reaching impact allows both top-down and bottom-up flow of information between experts and lay audience. With a vast proportion of Americans obtaining health-related information digitally, the purpose of this study was to describe the content of 100 most viewed YouTube videos in the English language, specific to genetically modified foods (GMFs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the search terms “genetically modified foods” the URLs and metadata for 100 English YouTube videos with the highest viewership were curated. Each video was viewed, and dichotomously coded for the absence or presence of ten content categories. Descriptive statistics, percentages of categorical variables and independent one-tailed t-tests (α=.05) were conducted to assess the statistical effect of the absence or presence of these categories on the number of views and likes garnered by the videos.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cumulatively, the 100 videos observed received 65,536,885 views and 1,328,605 likes. Only 7% of the videos were created by professionally credentialed individuals or organizations. More than 90% of the sampled videos described GMFs with an example, 50% mentioned their role in alleviating hunger, and 65% mentioned ecological concerns attributed to GMFs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our results underscore the need for health professionals to increase their digital presence on online media sharing platforms such as YouTube, and capitalize on its pervasiveness as potential conduits of accurate scientific information to equip consumers make evidence-based, informed decision regarding GMFs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72803,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in health","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653323000357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

YouTube is one of the most popular media sharing platforms that facilitates both professionals and lay people to participate in dissemination of knowledge and opinions. Its wide-reaching impact allows both top-down and bottom-up flow of information between experts and lay audience. With a vast proportion of Americans obtaining health-related information digitally, the purpose of this study was to describe the content of 100 most viewed YouTube videos in the English language, specific to genetically modified foods (GMFs).

Methods

Using the search terms “genetically modified foods” the URLs and metadata for 100 English YouTube videos with the highest viewership were curated. Each video was viewed, and dichotomously coded for the absence or presence of ten content categories. Descriptive statistics, percentages of categorical variables and independent one-tailed t-tests (α=.05) were conducted to assess the statistical effect of the absence or presence of these categories on the number of views and likes garnered by the videos.

Results

Cumulatively, the 100 videos observed received 65,536,885 views and 1,328,605 likes. Only 7% of the videos were created by professionally credentialed individuals or organizations. More than 90% of the sampled videos described GMFs with an example, 50% mentioned their role in alleviating hunger, and 65% mentioned ecological concerns attributed to GMFs.

Conclusions

Our results underscore the need for health professionals to increase their digital presence on online media sharing platforms such as YouTube, and capitalize on its pervasiveness as potential conduits of accurate scientific information to equip consumers make evidence-based, informed decision regarding GMFs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流行的YouTube视频对转基因食品有何评价?内容分析
youtube是最受欢迎的媒体分享平台之一,方便专业人士和非专业人士参与知识和观点的传播。其广泛的影响使得专家和外行之间的信息可以自上而下和自下而上地流动。由于很大一部分美国人通过数字方式获取与健康相关的信息,本研究的目的是描述100个观看次数最多的YouTube英语视频的内容,特别是转基因食品(GMFs)。方法以“转基因食品”为搜索词,对100个点击率最高的YouTube英文视频的url和元数据进行整理。每个视频都被观看,并对10个内容类别的缺失或存在进行二分编码。采用描述性统计、分类变量百分比和独立单侧t检验(α= 0.05)来评估这些类别是否存在对视频获得的观看数和点赞数的统计影响。结果观察到的100个视频累计获得65,536,885次观看和1,328,605次点赞。只有7%的视频是由有专业资质的个人或组织制作的。超过90%的抽样视频用实例描述了转基因食品,50%的视频提到了转基因食品在缓解饥饿方面的作用,65%的视频提到了转基因食品带来的生态问题。我们的研究结果强调了卫生专业人员需要增加他们在在线媒体分享平台(如YouTube)上的数字存在,并利用其普遍性作为准确科学信息的潜在渠道,帮助消费者做出基于证据的、知情的转基因食品决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogues in health
Dialogues in health Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Correlation between fall experience and life functions among community-dwelling older adults in Japan Breaking barriers: A gender-based quota system in nursing school admission in Bangladesh Success rates and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among treatment-naïve patients in Davao City, Philippines: A ten-year retrospective cohort study An overlooked risk for skin health: Less availability and higher cost of sunscreen for people with melanated skin Genomic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 variants circulated in the Philippines, 2020–2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1