Measurement invariance across Korean and English versions of the short almost perfect scale

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Counselling Psychology Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-12-04 DOI:10.1080/09515070.2022.2152779
H. Suh, Jeffrey S Ashby, K. Rice, L. Bruner
{"title":"Measurement invariance across Korean and English versions of the short almost perfect scale","authors":"H. Suh, Jeffrey S Ashby, K. Rice, L. Bruner","doi":"10.1080/09515070.2022.2152779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The current study addresses the cultural validity of the 8-item Short Almost Perfect Scale (SAPS) by investigating its measurement invariance across the choice of language (i.e. Korean vs. English) with a group of 206 Korean Americans. Given a wide variation in English proficiency among the Korean community, instruments may need to be administered either in Korean or English based on respondents’ preferences, thus ensuring the invariance of the measurement across two languages is critical for clinical and research purposes. The results supported configural invariance and metric invariance for both Discrepancy and Standards subscales. All four Discrepancy intercepts for the Korean version group were higher than those in the English version group, suggesting a systematic tendency for the Korean version group to rate themselves higher on Discrepancy items. The emphasis on self-cultivation in Korean culture may account for higher endorsement of certain SAPS items among individuals who chose the Korean version of the instrument compared to those who chose the English version. Given the support for configural and metric invariance, the two language versions of the SAPS were presumed to assess the same underlying perfectionism constructs and thus could be used interchangeably among Korean Americans.","PeriodicalId":51653,"journal":{"name":"Counselling Psychology Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling Psychology Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2022.2152779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The current study addresses the cultural validity of the 8-item Short Almost Perfect Scale (SAPS) by investigating its measurement invariance across the choice of language (i.e. Korean vs. English) with a group of 206 Korean Americans. Given a wide variation in English proficiency among the Korean community, instruments may need to be administered either in Korean or English based on respondents’ preferences, thus ensuring the invariance of the measurement across two languages is critical for clinical and research purposes. The results supported configural invariance and metric invariance for both Discrepancy and Standards subscales. All four Discrepancy intercepts for the Korean version group were higher than those in the English version group, suggesting a systematic tendency for the Korean version group to rate themselves higher on Discrepancy items. The emphasis on self-cultivation in Korean culture may account for higher endorsement of certain SAPS items among individuals who chose the Korean version of the instrument compared to those who chose the English version. Given the support for configural and metric invariance, the two language versions of the SAPS were presumed to assess the same underlying perfectionism constructs and thus could be used interchangeably among Korean Americans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩、英两种版本的测量不变性几乎是完美的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling Psychology Quarterly
Counselling Psychology Quarterly PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Counselling Psychology Quarterly is an international interdisciplinary journal, reporting on practice, research and theory. The journal is particularly keen to encourage and publish papers which will be of immediate practical relevance to counselling, clinical, occupational, health and medical psychologists throughout the world. Original, independently refereed contributions will be included on practice, research and theory - and especially articles which integrate these three areas - from whatever methodological or theoretical standpoint. The journal will also include international peer review commentaries on major issues.
期刊最新文献
Meaning-making in psychotherapy after traumatic loss: therapists’ perspectives Finding a voice: A qualitative investigation of the therapeutic relationship with patients suffering from avoidant personality disorder Factors moderating the relationship between peer contact and self-stigma in people with mental illness Across the professional lifespan: comparing the workforce trends of early career and established counselling psychologists in South Africa Exploring influences of supervision on psychotherapists’ professional development: correlates across career-level cohorts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1