Physiological and psychological responses to different yoga styles

YogaMimamsa Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI:10.4103/YM.YM_15_18
Jonathan Y. Cagas
{"title":"Physiological and psychological responses to different yoga styles","authors":"Jonathan Y. Cagas","doi":"10.4103/YM.YM_15_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Yoga is a popular mind-body program designed to improve muscular endurance, core stability, flexibility, and balance. Some styles of yoga appear to provide mild cardiovascular stimulus which may enhance cardiovascular endurance when performed regularly. Few studies have compared training intensity of different yoga styles. Aims: The aim of this study is to examine training intensity, caloric expenditure, and acute psychological response to three different styles of yoga (i.e., Dynamic, Hatha, and Gentle Yoga). Settings and Design: This was a quasi-experimental, within-group repeated measures design. Subjects and Methods: Eight young females (M = 19.24, standard deviation = 1.82) performed three yoga styles on separate occasions. Each participant wore chest-mounted heart rate (HR) monitor to record physiological data (i.e., average HR, maximum HR, calorie expenditure, training duration, and percentage of time within the 5 Polar-defined training zones). Participants filled out the Exercise-induced Feeling Inventory before and after each session. Statistical Analysis Used: Analysis was done using nonparametric statistical tests. Results: Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed significant differences in the average HR, calorie expenditure per minute, and time spent in Zone 2 (moderate intensity) between yoga styles. Follow-up analyses indicated that these physiological variables were higher in Dynamic Yoga compared to Hatha and Gentle. For psychological response, higher change in tranquility score was observed in Gentle Yoga compared to Hatha and Dynamic. Conclusions: This study concludes that different yoga styles elicit different training intensities and psychological response and extends current knowledge suggesting that health and fitness benefits of yoga may differ by style.","PeriodicalId":55843,"journal":{"name":"YogaMimamsa","volume":"50 1","pages":"53 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"YogaMimamsa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/YM.YM_15_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context: Yoga is a popular mind-body program designed to improve muscular endurance, core stability, flexibility, and balance. Some styles of yoga appear to provide mild cardiovascular stimulus which may enhance cardiovascular endurance when performed regularly. Few studies have compared training intensity of different yoga styles. Aims: The aim of this study is to examine training intensity, caloric expenditure, and acute psychological response to three different styles of yoga (i.e., Dynamic, Hatha, and Gentle Yoga). Settings and Design: This was a quasi-experimental, within-group repeated measures design. Subjects and Methods: Eight young females (M = 19.24, standard deviation = 1.82) performed three yoga styles on separate occasions. Each participant wore chest-mounted heart rate (HR) monitor to record physiological data (i.e., average HR, maximum HR, calorie expenditure, training duration, and percentage of time within the 5 Polar-defined training zones). Participants filled out the Exercise-induced Feeling Inventory before and after each session. Statistical Analysis Used: Analysis was done using nonparametric statistical tests. Results: Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed significant differences in the average HR, calorie expenditure per minute, and time spent in Zone 2 (moderate intensity) between yoga styles. Follow-up analyses indicated that these physiological variables were higher in Dynamic Yoga compared to Hatha and Gentle. For psychological response, higher change in tranquility score was observed in Gentle Yoga compared to Hatha and Dynamic. Conclusions: This study concludes that different yoga styles elicit different training intensities and psychological response and extends current knowledge suggesting that health and fitness benefits of yoga may differ by style.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对不同瑜伽风格的生理和心理反应
背景:瑜伽是一种流行的身心运动,旨在提高肌肉耐力、核心稳定性、灵活性和平衡性。有些瑜伽似乎提供轻微的心血管刺激,如果经常练习,可能会提高心血管耐力。很少有研究比较不同瑜伽风格的训练强度。目的:本研究的目的是研究三种不同风格的瑜伽(即动态瑜伽、哈达瑜伽和温和瑜伽)的训练强度、热量消耗和急性心理反应。设置和设计:这是一个准实验,组内重复测量设计。研究对象与方法:8名年轻女性(M = 19.24,标准差= 1.82)在不同场合进行三种瑜伽练习。每个参与者都佩戴胸装心率(HR)监测器来记录生理数据(即平均心率、最大心率、卡路里消耗、训练持续时间和在5个极地定义的训练区域内的时间百分比)。参与者在每次训练前后都填写了一份“运动诱发感觉量表”。采用统计分析:采用非参数统计检验进行分析。结果:Wilcoxon sign -rank检验显示,两种瑜伽风格在平均HR、每分钟卡路里消耗和2区(中等强度)时间上存在显著差异。后续分析表明,与哈达瑜伽和温和瑜伽相比,动态瑜伽的这些生理变量更高。在心理反应方面,与哈达瑜伽和动态瑜伽相比,温和瑜伽在平静得分上的变化更高。结论:本研究表明,不同的瑜伽风格会引起不同的训练强度和心理反应,并扩展了现有的知识,表明瑜伽的健康和健身益处可能因风格而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Global research trend on yoga and Yagya intervention on mental illness: A Bibliometric attributes of five decades (1972–2021) Developing a new improved yoga therapy treatment for asthma Age-related variation in lifestyle and its relationship to chronic disease as shown by a survey using a self-evaluation questionnaire Procedural mechanism of Dhyana in Goraksha Shataka: Constructivist reflections Effects of Bhastrika Pranayama (yoga bellows-type breathing) on pulmonary, cardiovascular, and psychological variables: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1