Mennonite Martyrs and Multimedia: On the Form and Function of Intermediality in Reformation Communication

L. Vermeersch
{"title":"Mennonite Martyrs and Multimedia: On the Form and Function of Intermediality in Reformation Communication","authors":"L. Vermeersch","doi":"10.14315/arg-2020-1110109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In August 1566, chronicle writer Marcus Van Vaernewijck noticed the vigor with which a young man debated a Calvinist preacher during one of the illegal hedge-preachings in Ghent. Van Vaernewijck identified the man as an Anabaptist. Anabaptists, he continued, were known for their clever debating tricks, a skill they had mastered because they were inspired by the arguments in the letters and songs that had been written by imprisoned and eventually executed Anabaptists.1 Most of these texts were compiled in the martyrology entitled Het Offer des Heeren (hereafter abbreviated as ODH).2 The popularity of this compilation suggests that printed communication played an important role in the dissemination of Anabaptist ideas. Yet Van Vaernewijck’s comment illustrates how the content of those printed texts also reached citizens through complex processes of medial interactions. The printed content was not simply read, it was also circulated and mediated through oral and performative communication. Most of the scholarship on these printed martyr texts has focused on the theological message of the text itself, but since the non-textual communication and iteration of the ideas within the text were at least as important as the text itself, this article seeks to analyze the form and functions of those medial interactions in the urban context of Ghent. Its central argument is that the content of early modern print must be analyzed as both the result and the subject of","PeriodicalId":42621,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY","volume":"111 1","pages":"194 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14315/arg-2020-1110109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In August 1566, chronicle writer Marcus Van Vaernewijck noticed the vigor with which a young man debated a Calvinist preacher during one of the illegal hedge-preachings in Ghent. Van Vaernewijck identified the man as an Anabaptist. Anabaptists, he continued, were known for their clever debating tricks, a skill they had mastered because they were inspired by the arguments in the letters and songs that had been written by imprisoned and eventually executed Anabaptists.1 Most of these texts were compiled in the martyrology entitled Het Offer des Heeren (hereafter abbreviated as ODH).2 The popularity of this compilation suggests that printed communication played an important role in the dissemination of Anabaptist ideas. Yet Van Vaernewijck’s comment illustrates how the content of those printed texts also reached citizens through complex processes of medial interactions. The printed content was not simply read, it was also circulated and mediated through oral and performative communication. Most of the scholarship on these printed martyr texts has focused on the theological message of the text itself, but since the non-textual communication and iteration of the ideas within the text were at least as important as the text itself, this article seeks to analyze the form and functions of those medial interactions in the urban context of Ghent. Its central argument is that the content of early modern print must be analyzed as both the result and the subject of
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诺会殉道者与多媒体:论宗教改革传播中介性的形式与功能
1566年8月,编年史作家Marcus Van vaernewijack注意到,在根特的一次非法的场外布道中,一个年轻人与一个加尔文主义传教士辩论时,表现出了极大的活力。Van Vaernewijck确认这名男子是再洗礼派教徒。他继续说,再洗礼派教徒以他们聪明的辩论技巧而闻名,他们之所以掌握了这一技能,是因为他们受到了被监禁和最终被处决的再洗礼派教徒所写的信件和歌曲中的论点的启发。1这些文本大多被汇编在题为《heet Offer des Heeren》(以下简称为ODH)的殉道著作中这本汇编的流行表明,印刷传播在再洗礼派思想的传播中发挥了重要作用。然而,Van Vaernewijck的评论说明了这些印刷文本的内容是如何通过复杂的媒体互动过程到达公民手中的。印刷的内容不仅仅是阅读,它还通过口头和表演交流进行传播和调解。大多数关于这些印刷殉道者文本的学术研究都集中在文本本身的神学信息上,但由于文本中非文本的交流和思想的迭代至少与文本本身一样重要,本文试图分析这些媒介互动在根特城市背景下的形式和功能。它的中心论点是,早期现代印刷的内容必须同时作为结果和主题来分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medicine and Healing in Martin Luther’s Thought Die Vermessung der Arche Noah. Mosaische Physik im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert Historia Persecutionum Ecclesiae Bohemicae between History, Identity, and Martyrology Inhalt The Early Salvation Theology of Juan de Valdés: Luther Once Again
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1