When Does Utilizing Valuation Specialists Reduce Auditors' Litigation Risk?

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Current Issues in Auditing Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.2308/ciia-52674
J. O. Brown, Jonathan H. Grenier, Jonathan S. Pyzoha, Andrew Reffett, Natalie Zielinski
{"title":"When Does Utilizing Valuation Specialists Reduce Auditors' Litigation Risk?","authors":"J. O. Brown, Jonathan H. Grenier, Jonathan S. Pyzoha, Andrew Reffett, Natalie Zielinski","doi":"10.2308/ciia-52674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article summarizes “The Effects of Specialist Type and Estimate Aggressiveness on Juror Judgments of Auditor Negligence” (Brown, Grenier, Pyzoha, and Reffett 2019), which examines two critical factors auditors consider when auditing complex estimates: type of specialist to engage and relative estimate aggressiveness. In an experiment involving an alleged audit failure, jurors were less likely to find auditors negligent when the auditors consulted with a valuation specialist, but only when managements' estimate was more aggressive. The study does not find similar litigation benefits of using a specialist for a less aggressive estimate. A second experiment extended these results by demonstrating that jurors were less likely to find auditors negligent when the auditors consulted with an external rather than an internal specialist. Further, the benefits of using an external specialist extended to auditors who initially engaged an internal specialist and brought in an external specialist to review the internal specialist's work.","PeriodicalId":44019,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Auditing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-52674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article summarizes “The Effects of Specialist Type and Estimate Aggressiveness on Juror Judgments of Auditor Negligence” (Brown, Grenier, Pyzoha, and Reffett 2019), which examines two critical factors auditors consider when auditing complex estimates: type of specialist to engage and relative estimate aggressiveness. In an experiment involving an alleged audit failure, jurors were less likely to find auditors negligent when the auditors consulted with a valuation specialist, but only when managements' estimate was more aggressive. The study does not find similar litigation benefits of using a specialist for a less aggressive estimate. A second experiment extended these results by demonstrating that jurors were less likely to find auditors negligent when the auditors consulted with an external rather than an internal specialist. Further, the benefits of using an external specialist extended to auditors who initially engaged an internal specialist and brought in an external specialist to review the internal specialist's work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
何时利用估值专家降低审计师的诉讼风险?
本文总结了“专家类型和估计攻击性对陪审员对审计师疏忽判断的影响”(Brown,Grenier,Pyzoha,and Reffett 2019),其中考察了审计师在审计复杂估计时考虑的两个关键因素:参与的专家类型和相对估计攻击性。在一项涉及所谓审计失败的实验中,当审计师咨询估值专家时,陪审员不太可能发现审计师疏忽,但只有当管理层的估计更激进时。该研究没有发现使用专家进行不那么激进的估计会带来类似的诉讼效益。第二个实验扩展了这些结果,证明当审计师咨询外部专家而不是内部专家时,陪审员不太可能发现审计师疏忽大意。此外,聘请外部专家的好处也适用于最初聘请内部专家并聘请外部专家审查内部专家工作的审计师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Issues in Auditing
Current Issues in Auditing BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Preparing Auditors to Evaluate Blockchains Used to Track Tangible Assets Comments of the Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association on the PCAOB’s Amendments to PCAOB Auditing Standards Related to a Company’s Noncompliance with Laws and Regulations and Other Related Amendments Comments of the Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association on the PCAOB’s Proposed Amendments Related to Aspects of Designing and Performing Audit Procedures That Involve Technology-Assisted Analysis of Information in Electronic Form Implications of Divided Responsibility in Audits Involving Component Auditors Editorial Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1