Finding help for OCD in Australia: development and evaluation of a clinician directory

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Australian Psychologist Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1080/00050067.2023.2189003
David D. J. Cooper, I. Perkes, J. Lam-Po-Tang, Lara J. Farrell, V. Brakoulias, J. Grisham
{"title":"Finding help for OCD in Australia: development and evaluation of a clinician directory","authors":"David D. J. Cooper, I. Perkes, J. Lam-Po-Tang, Lara J. Farrell, V. Brakoulias, J. Grisham","doi":"10.1080/00050067.2023.2189003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective People tend to live with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) for many years before receiving evidence-based treatment. This delay is partly due to a lack of access to information about which healthcare providers offer evidence-based treatment for OCD. This information was not easily accessible online for people in Australia. Methods In this study, we describe how an online directory of clinicians was developed and evaluated. We report on a needs analysis and survey of treatment-seeking histories among consumers and carers impacted by OCD. We describe the key features of the directory developed, and present survey feedback on its usability and utility. Results The results validated the need for a directory specific to clinicians who offer evidence-based treatment for OCD, and that it meets essential usability standards. Areas for improvement and further developments were identified. Conclusion This directory contributes to broader efforts invested to improve the treatment-seeking process for people living with OCD in Australia. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Globally, barriers to access delay appropriate treatment for OCD. One barrier is not knowing who offers evidence-based treatment specific to OCD. In Australia, there is no central source that provides such information. What this topic adds: The delays in treatment reported in Australia are comparable to other countries. We developed a directory of clinicians with a special interest in treating OCD. Consumer feedback suggests the directory will assist the treatment-seeking process.","PeriodicalId":47679,"journal":{"name":"Australian Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2023.2189003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective People tend to live with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) for many years before receiving evidence-based treatment. This delay is partly due to a lack of access to information about which healthcare providers offer evidence-based treatment for OCD. This information was not easily accessible online for people in Australia. Methods In this study, we describe how an online directory of clinicians was developed and evaluated. We report on a needs analysis and survey of treatment-seeking histories among consumers and carers impacted by OCD. We describe the key features of the directory developed, and present survey feedback on its usability and utility. Results The results validated the need for a directory specific to clinicians who offer evidence-based treatment for OCD, and that it meets essential usability standards. Areas for improvement and further developments were identified. Conclusion This directory contributes to broader efforts invested to improve the treatment-seeking process for people living with OCD in Australia. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: Globally, barriers to access delay appropriate treatment for OCD. One barrier is not knowing who offers evidence-based treatment specific to OCD. In Australia, there is no central source that provides such information. What this topic adds: The delays in treatment reported in Australia are comparable to other countries. We developed a directory of clinicians with a special interest in treating OCD. Consumer feedback suggests the directory will assist the treatment-seeking process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在澳大利亚寻找强迫症的帮助:临床医生目录的发展和评估
摘要目的强迫症(OCD)患者在接受循证治疗前往往会伴随多年。造成这种延误的部分原因是无法获得有关哪些医疗保健提供者为强迫症提供循证治疗的信息。在澳大利亚,人们不容易在网上获得这些信息。方法在本研究中,我们描述了如何开发和评估临床医生的在线目录。我们报告了强迫症患者和护理者寻求治疗历史的需求分析和调查。我们描述了开发的目录的关键特征,并在其可用性和实用性上提供调查反馈。结果验证了为临床医生提供循证治疗强迫症的目录的必要性,并且该目录符合基本的可用性标准。确定了需要改进和进一步发展的领域。结论:该指南有助于改善澳大利亚强迫症患者寻求治疗的过程。关于该主题的已知情况:在全球范围内,获取障碍延迟了强迫症的适当治疗。一个障碍是不知道谁提供针对强迫症的循证治疗。在澳大利亚,没有提供此类信息的中央来源。本主题补充内容:澳大利亚报告的治疗延误情况与其他国家相当。我们编制了一个对治疗强迫症有特殊兴趣的临床医生目录。消费者反馈表明,该目录将有助于寻求治疗的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Psychologist
Australian Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Australian Psychologist is the official applied practice and public policy journal of the Australian Psychological Society. As such, the journal solicits articles covering current issues in psychology, the science and practice of psychology, and psychology"s contribution to public policy, with particular emphasis on the Australian context. Periodically, Australian Psychological Society documents, including but not limited to, position papers, reports of the Society, ethics information, surveys of the membership, announcements, and selected award addresses may appear in the journal.
期刊最新文献
What counts? A Delphi consensus-based approach to interpreting accreditation standards for Direct Client Activities in clinical psychology and clinical neuropsychology programs Enabling psychologists to address the psychological consequences of cancer Necessary but not sufficient: examination of older adults’ connectedness with their online social contact during COVID-19 Using the temporal motivation theory to explain the relation between ADHD and procrastination Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the Self-Compassion Scale for Youth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1