Law Enforcement Activities of Philadelphia’s Group Violence Intervention: An Examination of Arrest, Case Processing, and Probation Levers

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Police Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1177/1098611119895069
Caterina G. Roman, Megan Forney, Jordan M. Hyatt, Hannah J. Klein, Nathan W. Link
{"title":"Law Enforcement Activities of Philadelphia’s Group Violence Intervention: An Examination of Arrest, Case Processing, and Probation Levers","authors":"Caterina G. Roman, Megan Forney, Jordan M. Hyatt, Hannah J. Klein, Nathan W. Link","doi":"10.1177/1098611119895069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of jurisdictions implementing focused deterrence strategies targeted at gangs continues unabated. Although recent research suggests positive impacts of the strategy on reductions in gun violence, little is known about the particular mechanisms operating behind the strategy. This article provides a descriptive analysis of the law enforcement activities or levers undertaken after enforcement operations in Philadelphia as a part of the focused deterrence strategy. The article quantifies the execution of levers related to arrest, case processing, and probation sanctioning during enforcement activities after shootings. The results show that Philadelphia achieved success in implementing the enforcement levers as intended, and there was little evidence that arrest practices were overly aggressive. The authors suggest that future evaluations seek to carefully document the wide array of levers used in concert with an assessment of community understanding of and reactions to the strategy as well as an examination of reactions of group members targeted.","PeriodicalId":47610,"journal":{"name":"Police Quarterly","volume":"23 1","pages":"232 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1098611119895069","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Police Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611119895069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The number of jurisdictions implementing focused deterrence strategies targeted at gangs continues unabated. Although recent research suggests positive impacts of the strategy on reductions in gun violence, little is known about the particular mechanisms operating behind the strategy. This article provides a descriptive analysis of the law enforcement activities or levers undertaken after enforcement operations in Philadelphia as a part of the focused deterrence strategy. The article quantifies the execution of levers related to arrest, case processing, and probation sanctioning during enforcement activities after shootings. The results show that Philadelphia achieved success in implementing the enforcement levers as intended, and there was little evidence that arrest practices were overly aggressive. The authors suggest that future evaluations seek to carefully document the wide array of levers used in concert with an assessment of community understanding of and reactions to the strategy as well as an examination of reactions of group members targeted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
费城群体暴力干预的执法活动:对逮捕、案件处理和缓刑杠杆的审查
针对帮派实施重点威慑战略的司法管辖区数量继续有增无减。尽管最近的研究表明,该战略对减少枪支暴力产生了积极影响,但人们对该战略背后的具体机制知之甚少。本文对费城执法行动后的执法活动或杠杆进行了描述性分析,作为重点威慑战略的一部分。这篇文章量化了枪击案后执法活动中与逮捕、案件处理和缓刑制裁有关的杠杆的执行情况。结果表明,费城在按预期实施执法手段方面取得了成功,几乎没有证据表明逮捕行为过于激进。作者建议,未来的评估应仔细记录所使用的各种杠杆,同时评估社区对该战略的理解和反应,并检查目标群体成员的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Police Quarterly
Police Quarterly CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Police Quarterly is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes theoretical contributions, empirical studies, essays, comparative analyses, critiques, innovative program descriptions, debates, and book reviews on issues related to policing.
期刊最新文献
Factors Promoting and Inhibiting Use of Wellness Resources Among Police: A Mixed Methods Study Law Enforcement-Based Outreach and Treatment Referral as a Response to Opioid Misuse: Assessing Reductions in Overdoses and Costs The 2020 De-Policing: An Empirical Analysis Sergeant Coffee Needs You: Evaluation of a Police Officer Bystander Intervention Program An Examination of Unintentional Use of Force by the Police
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1