{"title":"'Spot the Difference'","authors":"Nienke Woltman","doi":"10.52476/trb.9735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The small, unsigned panel The Lamentation of Christ in the Rijksmuseum’s collection is attributed to Colijn de Coter and dated around 1510-15. There is another, almost identical version in a private collection. Visual analysis and analytical techniques including UV fluorescence, infrared reflectography, X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-radiography, dendrochronology and paint sample analysis, were used to examine and compare the materials and techniques in both paintings in order to investigate the relationship between the two. Because only a small oeuvre is attributed to De Coter and there has as yet been very little scientific analysis of his paintings, this comparative investigation provides more information about the artist’s workshop practices. This research has revealed that the materials and techniques used in the two versions differ hardly at all and, moreover, correspond to standard practice in early sixteenth-century painting in the Low Countries. The thicker outlines in the underdrawings in both cases indicate that the compositions were traced or copied from the same model. The underdrawings of the two Lamentations also correspond to those in other paintings attributed to the artist. This makes it likely that both versions came from De Coter’s workshop.","PeriodicalId":40677,"journal":{"name":"Rijksmuseum Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rijksmuseum Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52476/trb.9735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The small, unsigned panel The Lamentation of Christ in the Rijksmuseum’s collection is attributed to Colijn de Coter and dated around 1510-15. There is another, almost identical version in a private collection. Visual analysis and analytical techniques including UV fluorescence, infrared reflectography, X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-radiography, dendrochronology and paint sample analysis, were used to examine and compare the materials and techniques in both paintings in order to investigate the relationship between the two. Because only a small oeuvre is attributed to De Coter and there has as yet been very little scientific analysis of his paintings, this comparative investigation provides more information about the artist’s workshop practices. This research has revealed that the materials and techniques used in the two versions differ hardly at all and, moreover, correspond to standard practice in early sixteenth-century painting in the Low Countries. The thicker outlines in the underdrawings in both cases indicate that the compositions were traced or copied from the same model. The underdrawings of the two Lamentations also correspond to those in other paintings attributed to the artist. This makes it likely that both versions came from De Coter’s workshop.
国立博物馆收藏的小而未签名的面板《基督的哀歌》(The Lamentation of Christ)被认为是Colijn de Coter的作品,年代约为1510-15年。私人收藏中还有另一个几乎完全相同的版本。使用视觉分析和分析技术,包括紫外线荧光、红外反射成像、X射线荧光(XRF)、X射线照相、树木年表和油漆样品分析,对两幅画中的材料和技术进行了检查和比较,以研究两者之间的关系。由于只有一小部分作品被认为是德·科特的作品,而且对他的画作几乎没有科学分析,因此这项比较调查提供了更多关于这位艺术家工作室实践的信息。这项研究表明,这两个版本中使用的材料和技术几乎没有任何差异,而且符合16世纪早期低地国家绘画的标准做法。在这两种情况下,下图中较粗的轮廓表明这些成分是从同一模型中追踪或复制的。这两幅《哀歌》的不足之处也与艺术家其他画作中的不足之处相对应。这使得这两个版本很可能都来自德科特的工作室。