A Comparative Study of Weight Loss and Reduction in BMI after Gastric Imbrication, Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

P. Tejasvi, A. Ghanghoria, Ruchita Banseria
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Weight Loss and Reduction in BMI after Gastric Imbrication, Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass","authors":"P. Tejasvi, A. Ghanghoria, Ruchita Banseria","doi":"10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10033-1443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Obesity is a worldwide epidemic and exercise supplemented with pharmacotherapy has poor long-term results; thus, bariatric surgery is the mainstay therapy for morbid obesity. But reduction in weight and BMI after bariatric surgery is not the same and mainly depends on the type of surgery performed. Aim and objective: To study the comparative efficacy among three bariatric surgeries viz. Laparoscopic gastric imbrication (LGI), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in morbid obese patients in relation to weight loss and reduction in BMI. Study design: Prospective study. Materials and methods: Total of 40 morbid obese patients underwent different types of laparoscopic bariatric surgery and were followed for 1 year. Reduction in weight and BMI after 1 year was correlated with the type of bariatric surgery performed. Statistical analysis: Paired t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Bonferroni. Results: Patients undergone LGI, LSG, and LRYGB had a preoperative mean weight/BMI of 105.33 kg/41.07 kg m −2 , 104.07 kg/42.76 kg m −2 , and 105.8 kg/43.27 kg m −2 , respectively; and postoperative mean weight/BMI after 1 year was 87.4 kg/34.08 kg m −2 , 81.07 kg/33.32 kg m −2 , and 81.2 kg/33.18 kg m −2 , respectively. On applying ANOVA and Bonferroni, LSG and LRYGB group had greater weight loss and reduction in BMI as compared to LGI group. Conclusion: LSG and LRYGB are statistically better in weight and BMI reduction in obese as compared to LGI. Although weight and BMI reduction was more in LRYGB as compared to LSG, it was not statistically significant.","PeriodicalId":38741,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10033-1443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a worldwide epidemic and exercise supplemented with pharmacotherapy has poor long-term results; thus, bariatric surgery is the mainstay therapy for morbid obesity. But reduction in weight and BMI after bariatric surgery is not the same and mainly depends on the type of surgery performed. Aim and objective: To study the comparative efficacy among three bariatric surgeries viz. Laparoscopic gastric imbrication (LGI), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in morbid obese patients in relation to weight loss and reduction in BMI. Study design: Prospective study. Materials and methods: Total of 40 morbid obese patients underwent different types of laparoscopic bariatric surgery and were followed for 1 year. Reduction in weight and BMI after 1 year was correlated with the type of bariatric surgery performed. Statistical analysis: Paired t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Bonferroni. Results: Patients undergone LGI, LSG, and LRYGB had a preoperative mean weight/BMI of 105.33 kg/41.07 kg m −2 , 104.07 kg/42.76 kg m −2 , and 105.8 kg/43.27 kg m −2 , respectively; and postoperative mean weight/BMI after 1 year was 87.4 kg/34.08 kg m −2 , 81.07 kg/33.32 kg m −2 , and 81.2 kg/33.18 kg m −2 , respectively. On applying ANOVA and Bonferroni, LSG and LRYGB group had greater weight loss and reduction in BMI as compared to LGI group. Conclusion: LSG and LRYGB are statistically better in weight and BMI reduction in obese as compared to LGI. Although weight and BMI reduction was more in LRYGB as compared to LSG, it was not statistically significant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃叠瓦术、袖状胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后体重减轻和BMI降低的比较研究
背景:肥胖是一种世界性流行病,运动辅以药物治疗的长期效果不佳;因此,减肥手术是治疗病态肥胖的主要方法。但减肥手术后体重和BMI的下降并不相同,主要取决于手术类型。目的和目的:研究腹腔镜胃叠瓦术(LGI)、腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)和腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)三种减肥手术在病态肥胖患者中与体重减轻和BMI降低的比较疗效。研究设计:前瞻性研究。材料和方法:共40例病态肥胖患者接受了不同类型的腹腔镜减肥手术,并随访1年。1年后体重和BMI的降低与所进行的减肥手术类型相关。统计分析:配对t检验,方差分析(ANOVA),Bonferroni。结果:接受LGI、LSG和LRYGB的患者术前平均体重/BMI分别为105.33公斤/41.07公斤m−2、104.07公斤/42.76公斤m−1和105.8公斤/43.27公斤m–2;术后1年平均体重/BMI分别为87.4kg/34.08kg m−2、81.07kg/33.32kg m−2和81.2kg/33.18kg m−2。在应用ANOVA和Bonferroni时,与LGI组相比,LSG和LRYGB组的体重减轻和BMI降低幅度更大。结论:与LGI相比,LSG和LRYGB在肥胖患者的体重和BMI降低方面具有统计学意义。尽管与LSG相比,LRYGB的体重和BMI减少更多,但在统计学上并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical Aspects of the Possover LION Procedure: An Emerging Procedure for Recovery of Visceral Functions and Locomotion in Paraplegics Avoiding the Falciform Ligament Sign during the Intraoperative Cholangiogram A Study on Effects of Leaking Carbon Dioxide Gas on Surgeons during Laparoscopic Surgeries Comparison between Laparoscopic Ultrasound and Intraoperative Cholangiogram in Detection of Common Bile Duct Stones during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Cholelithiasis: A Prospective Study Short-term Outcome of Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1