CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSES IN INVESTOR-STATE CONTRACTS FOR THE PROTECTION OF TRADE SECRETS AFTER PROMULGATION OF THE INDONESIAN ACT ON PUBLIC INFORMATION DISCLOSURE

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW IIUM Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-03 DOI:10.31436/iiumlj.v29i(s2).682
Sanusi Bintang, Mujibussalim Mujibussalim, M. Mahfud, Fikri Fikri
{"title":"CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSES IN INVESTOR-STATE CONTRACTS FOR THE PROTECTION OF TRADE SECRETS AFTER PROMULGATION OF THE INDONESIAN ACT ON PUBLIC INFORMATION DISCLOSURE","authors":"Sanusi Bintang, Mujibussalim Mujibussalim, M. Mahfud, Fikri Fikri","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v29i(s2).682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A confidentiality clause is a clause in investor-state contracts which is in the operative part of the contract to guarantee adequate protection of the trade secrets of the contracting parties. This article argues that there is a need to change the current practice where investor-state contracts in Indonesia utilizes broadly defined confidentiality clauses as a means to protect trade secrets in international business transactions. This is because a broadly defined confidentiality clause is contradictory to the provisions of the Act on Public Information Disclosure (APID). APID is aimed mainly at providing public information disclosure. The public information includes public contracts, such as investor-state contracts. Therefore, a new model of the confidentiality clause is needed for the protection of trade secrets as intended by the Act on Trade Secrets (ATS) and contract law as well as public information disclosure as intended by APID. This article employs doctrinal legal research. The research utilized, primary, secondary, and tertiary legal authorities. The primary legal material intensively used in this article consists of mandatory-primary legal authorities, in the form of statutes and contracts. The contracts used are the investor-state contracts of Aceh Province, Indonesia. The finding shows that a new model of the confidentiality clause can be created by accommodating both the interest of the state for providing public information disclosure based on APID and the interest of investors for the protection of trade secrets based on ATS and contract law. Investor-state contracts are a specific type of contract which has specific characteristics that apply to both private law and public law. They are different from purely international commercial contracts which only apply private law. Investor-state contract drafters need to be aware of this difference and provide a more balanced confidentiality clause in the contracts.","PeriodicalId":40704,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v29i(s2).682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A confidentiality clause is a clause in investor-state contracts which is in the operative part of the contract to guarantee adequate protection of the trade secrets of the contracting parties. This article argues that there is a need to change the current practice where investor-state contracts in Indonesia utilizes broadly defined confidentiality clauses as a means to protect trade secrets in international business transactions. This is because a broadly defined confidentiality clause is contradictory to the provisions of the Act on Public Information Disclosure (APID). APID is aimed mainly at providing public information disclosure. The public information includes public contracts, such as investor-state contracts. Therefore, a new model of the confidentiality clause is needed for the protection of trade secrets as intended by the Act on Trade Secrets (ATS) and contract law as well as public information disclosure as intended by APID. This article employs doctrinal legal research. The research utilized, primary, secondary, and tertiary legal authorities. The primary legal material intensively used in this article consists of mandatory-primary legal authorities, in the form of statutes and contracts. The contracts used are the investor-state contracts of Aceh Province, Indonesia. The finding shows that a new model of the confidentiality clause can be created by accommodating both the interest of the state for providing public information disclosure based on APID and the interest of investors for the protection of trade secrets based on ATS and contract law. Investor-state contracts are a specific type of contract which has specific characteristics that apply to both private law and public law. They are different from purely international commercial contracts which only apply private law. Investor-state contract drafters need to be aware of this difference and provide a more balanced confidentiality clause in the contracts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼《公开信息披露法》颁布后投资者与国家合同中保护商业秘密的保密条款
保密条款是投资者与国家合同中的一项条款,是合同的执行部分,旨在保证充分保护缔约方的商业秘密。这篇文章认为,有必要改变目前的做法,即印度尼西亚的投资者-国家合同利用定义广泛的保密条款来保护国际商业交易中的商业秘密。这是因为广义的保密条款与《公共信息披露法》的规定相矛盾。APID的主要目的是提供公开信息披露。公共信息包括公共合同,如投资者-国家合同。因此,需要一种新的保密条款模式来保护《商业秘密法》和合同法所规定的商业秘密,以及APID所规定的公共信息披露。本文运用了理论法学研究方法。该研究利用了一级、二级和三级法律权威。本条集中使用的主要法律材料包括强制性的主要法律权威,形式为法规和合同。使用的合同是印度尼西亚亚齐省的投资者-国家合同。研究结果表明,通过兼顾国家根据APID提供公共信息披露的利益和投资者根据ATS和合同法保护商业秘密的利益,可以创建一种新的保密条款模式。投资者-国家合同是一种特定类型的合同,具有适用于私法和公法的特定特征。它们不同于只适用私法的纯粹国际商业合同。投资者-国家合同起草者需要意识到这一差异,并在合同中提供更平衡的保密条款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
GUESS EDITORS OPTIMISING WAQF LAW FOR EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1949 AND STATE WAQF ENACTMENTS BALANCING THE RIGHT OF GIG ECONOMY WORKERS IN THE CONTEXT OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING THE ISLAMIC LEGAL SYSTEM IN MALAYSIA: CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES A REVIEW OF THE MALAYSIAN JURISPRUDENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1