Does Households’ Wealth Predict the Efficiency of their Asset Mix? Empirical Evidence

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS Review of Behavioral Economics Pub Date : 2019-07-31 DOI:10.1561/105.00000106
A. Oehler, M. Horn
{"title":"Does Households’ Wealth Predict the\nEfficiency of their Asset Mix?\nEmpirical Evidence","authors":"A. Oehler, M. Horn","doi":"10.1561/105.00000106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze whether the efficiency of households’ asset mixes is driven by households’ wealth as suggested by previous studies. This question is of particular importance when assessing if employing a buy-and-hold strategy with their current asset mix is an appropriate advice for all households. Using the dataset of the Panel on Household Finances by the German central bank and a new approach that extracts household-specific portfolios to measure households’ wealth available for investments, we find that more wealthy households do not have a more efficient asset mix. Instead, the gender of the financial knowledgeable person (FKP) and the household’s risk attitude significantly influence the efficiency of the household’s asset mix. Our results are robust to household members’ estimation regarding future savings and the FKP’s formal level of education and financial literacy. A buy-and-hold strategy in low-fee index products could, therefore, considerably enhance both more and less wealthy households’ investment success.","PeriodicalId":43339,"journal":{"name":"Review of Behavioral Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1561/105.00000106","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Behavioral Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

We analyze whether the efficiency of households’ asset mixes is driven by households’ wealth as suggested by previous studies. This question is of particular importance when assessing if employing a buy-and-hold strategy with their current asset mix is an appropriate advice for all households. Using the dataset of the Panel on Household Finances by the German central bank and a new approach that extracts household-specific portfolios to measure households’ wealth available for investments, we find that more wealthy households do not have a more efficient asset mix. Instead, the gender of the financial knowledgeable person (FKP) and the household’s risk attitude significantly influence the efficiency of the household’s asset mix. Our results are robust to household members’ estimation regarding future savings and the FKP’s formal level of education and financial literacy. A buy-and-hold strategy in low-fee index products could, therefore, considerably enhance both more and less wealthy households’ investment success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭财富能预测其资产组合的效率吗?经验证据
我们分析家庭的效率™ 资产组合由家庭驱动™ 财富,正如先前的研究所表明的那样。当评估在当前资产组合中采用买入并持有策略是否适合所有家庭时,这个问题尤为重要。使用德国央行家庭金融委员会的数据集和一种提取特定家庭投资组合的新方法来衡量家庭™ 可用于投资的财富,我们发现,更富裕的家庭没有更有效的资产组合。相反,金融知识渊博的人(FKP)和家庭的性别™风险态度显著影响家庭的效率™的资产组合。我们的结果对家庭成员来说是稳健的™ 关于未来节约和FKP的估计™她的正规教育水平和金融知识。因此,低费用指数产品的购买和持有策略可以大大提高富裕家庭和不富裕家庭的收入™ 投资成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Rationality and Emotionality Interplay and Economic Contributions: A Neuroeconomics Experiment Opportunity Inequality of Property Income Distribution: Measurement, Decomposition, and Comparison Fairness and Arbitration Mechanisms The Effects of Expected Value and Episodic Memory on Preference Reversals Economic Individualism, Perceived Fairness, and Policy Preference: A Cross-Cultural Comparison
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1