Comparing sources of stress for state and private school teachers in England

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Improving Schools Pub Date : 2021-06-23 DOI:10.1177/13654802211024758
J. Brady, Elaine Wilson
{"title":"Comparing sources of stress for state and private school teachers in England","authors":"J. Brady, Elaine Wilson","doi":"10.1177/13654802211024758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching is understood to be a highly stressful profession. In England, workload, high-stakes accountability policies and pupil behaviour are often cited as stressors that contribute to teachers’ decisions to leave posts in the state-funded sector. Many of these teachers leave state teaching to take jobs in private schools, but very little is known about the nature of teachers’ work in the private sector. This research addresses this gap in knowledge and compares the sources of stress experienced by 20 teachers in the state sector to those of 20 teachers in the private sector. The paper is based on qualitative data from a larger study. It analyses data collected in interviews and focus groups with classroom teachers and middle leaders working in mainstream primary and secondary phase education in England. The results emphasise state school teachers’ acute distress in relation to workloads driven by accountability cultures. In comparison, private school teachers report less intense experiences of work-related stress, but some identify demanding parents as a concern. The research’s novelty lies in this comparison between sectors and these sector specific insights may help to focus school leaders’ efforts to improve teaching conditions in both sectors.","PeriodicalId":45995,"journal":{"name":"Improving Schools","volume":"25 1","pages":"205 - 220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/13654802211024758","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving Schools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13654802211024758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Teaching is understood to be a highly stressful profession. In England, workload, high-stakes accountability policies and pupil behaviour are often cited as stressors that contribute to teachers’ decisions to leave posts in the state-funded sector. Many of these teachers leave state teaching to take jobs in private schools, but very little is known about the nature of teachers’ work in the private sector. This research addresses this gap in knowledge and compares the sources of stress experienced by 20 teachers in the state sector to those of 20 teachers in the private sector. The paper is based on qualitative data from a larger study. It analyses data collected in interviews and focus groups with classroom teachers and middle leaders working in mainstream primary and secondary phase education in England. The results emphasise state school teachers’ acute distress in relation to workloads driven by accountability cultures. In comparison, private school teachers report less intense experiences of work-related stress, but some identify demanding parents as a concern. The research’s novelty lies in this comparison between sectors and these sector specific insights may help to focus school leaders’ efforts to improve teaching conditions in both sectors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较英国公立和私立学校教师的压力来源
教学被认为是一项压力很大的职业。在英国,工作量、高风险问责政策和学生行为经常被认为是导致教师决定离开国家资助部门职位的压力因素。这些教师中有许多离开了公立学校,去私立学校工作,但人们对私立学校教师工作的性质知之甚少。本研究解决了这一知识差距,并比较了20名公立部门教师与20名私立部门教师所经历的压力来源。这篇论文基于一项大型研究的定性数据。它分析了在采访中收集的数据,并与在英国主流小学和中学阶段教育工作的课堂教师和中层领导进行了焦点小组讨论。结果强调了公立学校教师在问责制文化驱动下的工作量方面的严重困扰。相比之下,私立学校的教师报告的工作压力较小,但一些人认为要求苛刻的父母是一个问题。这项研究的新颖之处在于对各个部门的比较,这些部门的具体见解可能有助于学校领导集中精力改善两个部门的教学条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Improving Schools
Improving Schools EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Improving Schools is for all those engaged in school development, whether improving schools in difficulty or making successful schools even better. The journal includes contributions from across the world with an increasingly international readership including teachers, heads, academics, education authority staff, inspectors and consultants. Improving Schools has created a forum for the exchange of ideas and experiences. Major national policies and initiatives have been evaluated, to share good practice and to highlight problems. The journal also reports on visits to successful schools in diverse contexts, and includes book reviews on a wide range of developmental issues.
期刊最新文献
Integrating pro-environmental behaviors into school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports for creating green schools Teachers’ digital pedagogies and experiences in virtual classrooms Translating sophisticated data analytic strategies regarding school attendance and absenteeism into targeted educational policy Editorial Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1