What did they say? A typology of CEO activism

IF 3.1 Q2 BUSINESS Society and Business Review Pub Date : 2022-10-19 DOI:10.1108/sbr-05-2022-0154
Cynthia S. Cycyota
{"title":"What did they say? A typology of CEO activism","authors":"Cynthia S. Cycyota","doi":"10.1108/sbr-05-2022-0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe practice of corporate chief executive officer (CEOs) engaging in sociopolitical activism on issues both related and unrelated to their companies is gaining attention in the popular press and among management scholars. The purpose of this paper is to explore the antecedents and motivations of CEO sociopolitical activism in a typology of influences internal and external to the CEO and to the organization. This study’s typology highlights the need for greater understanding of CEOs’ sociopolitical activism for the CEO as an individual actor and for the company they represent.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study’s approach is to conceptually review the literature on CEO activism and to create a theoretic framework for future analysis of the antecedents and motivations and ramifications of CEOs’ sociopolitical activism for the CEO as an individual actor and for the company they represent. The author highlights four theories and seeks future application of these theories to the phenomena in a typology.\n\n\nFindings\nThe typology highlights the application of management theories to various ramifications of CEO activism to four influences on CEO activities. Upper echelons theory helps explain the motivation of a CEO internally, whereas agency theory applies to CEO activism internal to the CEO and external to the organizational operations. External to the CEO, organizational culture theory supports responses internal to the organization, and stakeholder theory provides insight into responses external to the CEO and the organization.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study provides conceptual support for the study of CEO activism and encourages future research on the topic.\n","PeriodicalId":44608,"journal":{"name":"Society and Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-05-2022-0154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The practice of corporate chief executive officer (CEOs) engaging in sociopolitical activism on issues both related and unrelated to their companies is gaining attention in the popular press and among management scholars. The purpose of this paper is to explore the antecedents and motivations of CEO sociopolitical activism in a typology of influences internal and external to the CEO and to the organization. This study’s typology highlights the need for greater understanding of CEOs’ sociopolitical activism for the CEO as an individual actor and for the company they represent. Design/methodology/approach This study’s approach is to conceptually review the literature on CEO activism and to create a theoretic framework for future analysis of the antecedents and motivations and ramifications of CEOs’ sociopolitical activism for the CEO as an individual actor and for the company they represent. The author highlights four theories and seeks future application of these theories to the phenomena in a typology. Findings The typology highlights the application of management theories to various ramifications of CEO activism to four influences on CEO activities. Upper echelons theory helps explain the motivation of a CEO internally, whereas agency theory applies to CEO activism internal to the CEO and external to the organizational operations. External to the CEO, organizational culture theory supports responses internal to the organization, and stakeholder theory provides insight into responses external to the CEO and the organization. Originality/value This study provides conceptual support for the study of CEO activism and encourages future research on the topic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他们说了什么?CEO行动主义的一种类型
企业首席执行官(ceo)在与公司相关或无关的问题上参与社会政治活动的做法,正受到大众媒体和管理学者的关注。本文的目的是在CEO和组织的内部和外部影响类型中探索CEO社会政治行动主义的前因和动机。这项研究的类型学强调了对CEO作为个体行动者和他们所代表的公司的社会政治行动主义有更多理解的必要性。设计/方法/方法本研究的方法是从概念上回顾CEO行动主义的文献,并为未来分析CEO作为个体行动者及其所代表的公司的社会政治行动主义的前因、动机和后果创建一个理论框架。作者强调了四种理论,并探讨了这些理论在类型学现象中的未来应用。该类型学强调了管理理论在CEO行动主义的各种分支中的应用,以及对CEO活动的四种影响。高层理论有助于解释CEO的内部动机,而代理理论则适用于CEO内部和组织运营外部的CEO行动主义。在CEO外部,组织文化理论支持组织内部的反应,利益相关者理论提供了对CEO和组织外部反应的洞察。原创性/价值本研究为CEO行动主义的研究提供了概念上的支持,并鼓励未来对该主题的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
The influence of workplace Confucian culture on employees’ organizational commitment through the modelling role of moral identities Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance: the moderating role of economic freedom The impact of flexible work arrangements on an older grieving population Mandatory CSR regime strips the competitive advantage: a comparative study of pre-post CSR mandate using the Bandwagon-bias effect theory Back to the basics: is business ethics an oxymoron?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1