Use of Two Complementary Bioinformatic Approaches to Identify Differentially Methylated Regions in Neonatal Sepsis

Q3 Computer Science Open Bioinformatics Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-25 DOI:10.2174/1875036202114010144
P. Navarrete, María José Garzón, Sheila Lorente-Pozo, Salvador Mena-Mollá, M. Vento, F. Pallardó, J. Beltrán-García, R. Osca-Verdegal, E. García-López, J. García-Giménez
{"title":"Use of Two Complementary Bioinformatic Approaches to Identify Differentially Methylated Regions in Neonatal Sepsis","authors":"P. Navarrete, María José Garzón, Sheila Lorente-Pozo, Salvador Mena-Mollá, M. Vento, F. Pallardó, J. Beltrán-García, R. Osca-Verdegal, E. García-López, J. García-Giménez","doi":"10.2174/1875036202114010144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Neonatal sepsis is a heterogeneous condition affecting preterm infants whose underlying mechanisms remain unknown. The analysis of changes in the DNA methylation pattern can contribute to improving the understanding of molecular pathways underlying disease pathophysiology. Methylation EPIC 850K BeadChip technology is an excellent tool for genome-wide methylation analyses and the detection of differentially methylated regions (DMRs).\n \n \n \n The aim is to identify DNA methylation traits in complex diseases, such as neonatal sepsis, using data from Methylation EPIC 850K BeadChip arrays.\n \n \n \n Two different bioinformatic methods, DMRcate (a supervised approach) and mCSEA (an unsupervised approach), were used to identify DMRs using EPIC data from leukocytes of neonatal septic patients. Here, we describe with detail the implementation of both methods as well as their applicability, briefly discussing the results obtained for neonatal sepsis.\n \n \n \n Differences in methylation levels were observed in neonatal sepsis patients. Moreover, differences were identified between the two subsets of the disease: Early-Onset neonatal Sepsis (EOS) and Late-Onset Neonatal Sepsis (LOS).\n \n \n \n This approach by using DMRcate and mCSA helped us to gain insight into the intricate mechanisms that may drive EOS and LOS development and progression in newborns.\n","PeriodicalId":38956,"journal":{"name":"Open Bioinformatics Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Bioinformatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1875036202114010144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neonatal sepsis is a heterogeneous condition affecting preterm infants whose underlying mechanisms remain unknown. The analysis of changes in the DNA methylation pattern can contribute to improving the understanding of molecular pathways underlying disease pathophysiology. Methylation EPIC 850K BeadChip technology is an excellent tool for genome-wide methylation analyses and the detection of differentially methylated regions (DMRs). The aim is to identify DNA methylation traits in complex diseases, such as neonatal sepsis, using data from Methylation EPIC 850K BeadChip arrays. Two different bioinformatic methods, DMRcate (a supervised approach) and mCSEA (an unsupervised approach), were used to identify DMRs using EPIC data from leukocytes of neonatal septic patients. Here, we describe with detail the implementation of both methods as well as their applicability, briefly discussing the results obtained for neonatal sepsis. Differences in methylation levels were observed in neonatal sepsis patients. Moreover, differences were identified between the two subsets of the disease: Early-Onset neonatal Sepsis (EOS) and Late-Onset Neonatal Sepsis (LOS). This approach by using DMRcate and mCSA helped us to gain insight into the intricate mechanisms that may drive EOS and LOS development and progression in newborns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用两种互补的生物信息学方法识别新生儿败血症中不同甲基化区域
新生儿脓毒症是一种影响早产儿的异质性疾病,其潜在机制尚不清楚。分析DNA甲基化模式的变化有助于提高对疾病病理生理学基础的分子途径的理解。EPIC 850K BeadChip技术是全基因组甲基化分析和差异甲基化区域(DMRs)检测的优秀工具。目的是利用methylation EPIC 850K BeadChip阵列的数据,鉴定复杂疾病(如新生儿败血症)中的DNA甲基化特征。两种不同的生物信息学方法,DMRcate(一种监督方法)和mCSEA(一种无监督方法),使用新生儿败血症患者白细胞的EPIC数据来识别DMRs。在这里,我们详细描述了这两种方法的实施及其适用性,并简要讨论了新生儿败血症的结果。新生儿败血症患者的甲基化水平存在差异。此外,该疾病的两个亚群之间也存在差异:早发型新生儿脓毒症(EOS)和晚发型新生儿脓毒症(LOS)。这种方法通过使用DMRcate和mCSA帮助我们深入了解可能驱动新生儿EOS和LOS发展和进展的复杂机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Bioinformatics Journal
Open Bioinformatics Journal Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: The Open Bioinformatics Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters, clinical trial studies and guest edited single topic issues in all areas of bioinformatics and computational biology. The coverage includes biomedicine, focusing on large data acquisition, analysis and curation, computational and statistical methods for the modeling and analysis of biological data, and descriptions of new algorithms and databases. The Open Bioinformatics Journal, a peer reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on the developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Decision-making Support System for Predicting and Eliminating Malnutrition and Anemia Immunoinformatics Approach for the Design of Chimeric Vaccine Against Whitmore Disease A New Deep Learning Model based on Neuroimaging for Predicting Alzheimer's Disease Early Prediction of Covid-19 Samples from Chest X-ray Images using Deep Learning Approach Electronic Health Record (EHR) System Development for Study on EHR Data-based Early Prediction of Diabetes Using Machine Learning Algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1