In Their Shoes: Health Care in Armed Conflict from the Perspective of a Non-State Armed Actor

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Daedalus Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1162/daed_a_01995
A. Sjöberg, M. Balcı
{"title":"In Their Shoes: Health Care in Armed Conflict from the Perspective of a Non-State Armed Actor","authors":"A. Sjöberg, M. Balcı","doi":"10.1162/daed_a_01995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The protection of health care in armed conflict dates to the 1864 Geneva Convention. Yet violations of international humanitarian law related to the protection of health care occur on a near daily basis, and conflict actors continue to obstruct health care actors from assisting people in need in conflict areas. An estimated one-third of the recorded threats affecting health care are attributed to non-state armed actors (NSAAs). Yet given that many NSAAs themselves do in fact provide and facilitate health care, this essay considers NSAAs not just as threats but, in line with international human rights law, also as potential facilitators, providers, and promoters of health care. We discuss the specific case of Northeast Syria, where one NSAA has de facto control of the territory, and examine the level of involvement of NSAAs in the respect, protection, and provision of health care. We also explore some opportunities and challenges in engagement between humanitarian actors and NSAAs on health care provision, with an emphasis on seeing health care from the perspective of the NSAAs themselves.","PeriodicalId":47980,"journal":{"name":"Daedalus","volume":"152 1","pages":"103-124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Daedalus","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01995","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The protection of health care in armed conflict dates to the 1864 Geneva Convention. Yet violations of international humanitarian law related to the protection of health care occur on a near daily basis, and conflict actors continue to obstruct health care actors from assisting people in need in conflict areas. An estimated one-third of the recorded threats affecting health care are attributed to non-state armed actors (NSAAs). Yet given that many NSAAs themselves do in fact provide and facilitate health care, this essay considers NSAAs not just as threats but, in line with international human rights law, also as potential facilitators, providers, and promoters of health care. We discuss the specific case of Northeast Syria, where one NSAA has de facto control of the territory, and examine the level of involvement of NSAAs in the respect, protection, and provision of health care. We also explore some opportunities and challenges in engagement between humanitarian actors and NSAAs on health care provision, with an emphasis on seeing health care from the perspective of the NSAAs themselves.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
站在他们的立场:从非国家武装行动者的角度看武装冲突中的医疗保健
武装冲突中的医疗保护可追溯到1864年的《日内瓦公约》。然而,与保护医疗保健有关的违反国际人道主义法的行为几乎每天都在发生,冲突行为者继续阻碍医疗保健行为者向冲突地区有需要的人提供援助。据估计,记录在案的影响卫生保健的威胁中有三分之一是由非国家武装行为者造成的。然而,鉴于许多NSAAs本身实际上确实提供和促进医疗保健,本文认为NSAAs不仅是威胁,而且符合国际人权法,也是医疗保健的潜在促进者、提供者和推动者。我们讨论了叙利亚东北部的具体案例,其中一个国家医疗服务机构实际上控制了该地区,并考察了国家医疗服务机构在尊重、保护和提供医疗服务方面的参与程度。我们还探讨了人道主义行为体与国家医疗服务机构就医疗服务提供进行接触时的一些机遇和挑战,重点是从国家医疗服务机构本身的角度看待医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Daedalus
Daedalus Multiple-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Daedalus was founded in 1955 as the Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. It draws on the enormous intellectual capacity of the American Academy, whose members are among the nation"s most prominent thinkers in the arts, sciences, and humanities. Each issue addresses a theme with authoritative essays on topics such as judicial independence, reflecting on the humanities, the global nuclear future, the challenge of mass incarceration, the future of news, the economy, the military, and race.
期刊最新文献
Disorders of Mood: The Experience of Those Who Have Them Rethinking Psychiatry: Solutions for a Sociogenic Crisis Two Sides of Depression: Medical & Social Indigenous Historical Trauma: Alter-Native Explanations for Mental Health Inequities The Biology of Mental Disorders: Progress at Last
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1