“Only the Rivers Do Not Come Back”: Conservation Displacement and Rural Responses in Costa Rica

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Latin American Research Review Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI:10.1017/lar.2023.2
Joseph U. Lenti
{"title":"“Only the Rivers Do Not Come Back”: Conservation Displacement and Rural Responses in Costa Rica","authors":"Joseph U. Lenti","doi":"10.1017/lar.2023.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Costa Rica’s environmental regime is world renowned, and since the mid-twentieth century, the country has protected its inestimable natural resources via land conservation expropriation. Through conservation Costa Rica ended the historical plague of deforestation, and its national parks and nature reserves buttress an ecotourism industry that is an important source of foreign revenue. But with every act of conservation, a human toll was also paid. As rural lands became protected areas, rural people lost access to places they depended on for survival. They hence became “victims” or, to some, “enemies” of conservation, and in nearly every setting, they resisted by carrying out land invasions; squatting; unauthorized ranching, farming, and mining; and even environmental banditry (as with the burning of La Casona in Santa Rosa National Park in 2001). Focusing on a handful of celebrated cases of land conservation, this analysis demonstrates how the creation of natural havens such as Corcovado National Park in 1975 displaced rural people and the various ways those people responded.","PeriodicalId":47316,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/lar.2023.2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Costa Rica’s environmental regime is world renowned, and since the mid-twentieth century, the country has protected its inestimable natural resources via land conservation expropriation. Through conservation Costa Rica ended the historical plague of deforestation, and its national parks and nature reserves buttress an ecotourism industry that is an important source of foreign revenue. But with every act of conservation, a human toll was also paid. As rural lands became protected areas, rural people lost access to places they depended on for survival. They hence became “victims” or, to some, “enemies” of conservation, and in nearly every setting, they resisted by carrying out land invasions; squatting; unauthorized ranching, farming, and mining; and even environmental banditry (as with the burning of La Casona in Santa Rosa National Park in 2001). Focusing on a handful of celebrated cases of land conservation, this analysis demonstrates how the creation of natural havens such as Corcovado National Park in 1975 displaced rural people and the various ways those people responded.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“只有河流不会回来”:哥斯达黎加的保护性流离失所和农村应对措施
摘要哥斯达黎加的环境制度享誉世界,自20世纪中期以来,该国通过土地保护征用保护了其不可估量的自然资源。通过保护,哥斯达黎加结束了森林砍伐的历史瘟疫,其国家公园和自然保护区支持了生态旅游业,这是外国收入的重要来源。但每一次保护行动都会造成人员伤亡。随着农村土地成为保护区,农村人民失去了赖以生存的地方。因此,他们成为了保护的“受害者”,或者对一些人来说是“敌人”,几乎在任何情况下,他们都通过土地入侵进行抵抗;深蹲;未经授权的牧场、农业和采矿;甚至是环境土匪(如2001年圣罗莎国家公园的拉卡索纳被烧毁)。这项分析聚焦于少数著名的土地保护案例,展示了1975年科尔科瓦多国家公园等自然避难所的创建如何使农村人口流离失所,以及这些人的各种应对方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Latin American Research Review is the premier interdisciplinary journal that publishes original research and surveys of current research on Latin America and the Caribbean. Interdisciplinary offerings reflect ahead-of-the-curve research, as well as new directions of knowledge creation in areas such as cultural studies, Latino issues and transnationalism, all of which increasingly intersect with Latin America in ways that are intellectually challenging and illuminating.
期刊最新文献
Partisanship, Cross-Party Coalitions, and Social Policymaking in Brazil Maize Landscapes in Indigenous Literatures: Toward Alternative Cartographic Imaginaries La consolidación discursiva de la cisheteronormatividad a través de la marginalización del metrosexual, y las mujeres trans: El caso de la revista SoHo (1999–2014), Colombia Precarity and Hope in Contemporary Latin America “We Are Happy Here”: Creating Communist Cuba and the Mariel Crisis of 1980
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1